Militia Violent Extremists in the United States: Understanding the Evolution of the Threat

Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, Colin P. Clarke, Samuel Hogdson
{"title":"Militia Violent Extremists in the United States: Understanding the Evolution of the Threat","authors":"Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, Colin P. Clarke, Samuel Hogdson","doi":"10.19165/2022.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Militia violent extremists (MVEs) pose a growing threat within the United States. MVEs were the most prominent and well-organised participants in the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol and have plotted numerous acts of lethal violence against law enforcement, government officials, and civilians in the past decade. MVEs are motivated by a belief that private citizens must use violence to resist government overreach, combat purported tyranny, or maintain law and order. While participants in the broader militia movement embrace similar beliefs, MVEs are distinguished by their willingness to carry out violence. MVEs typically organise in small local or regional militias, though many movement participants do not affiliate with a specific organisation. The modern militia movement developed at the end of the twentieth century, but social media has transformed the movement's structure and fuelled its growth. Movement members have organised loose umbrella networks at the national level, most notably the Oath Keepers and Three Percenters, while others have coalesced around specific memes or ideas, including the accelerationist Boogaloo movement, border defence, opposition to federal stewardship of public land, and opposition to COVID-19 public health measures. MVE violence has been similarly diverse. In addition to the attack on the US Capitol, MVEs have attempted to kill law enforcement officers, plotted to kidnap government officials, and engaged in multiple standoffs with law enforcement in response to government action. Because the MVE movement is largely domestic, US policymakers have several options for countering this threat. The US government can limit radicalisation through transparency around its domestic activity, thereby countering the anti-authority sentiments and conspiracy theories that fuel the movement. Further, federal legislation targeting militia activity and improved counter-extremism training can provide law enforcement with the tools necessary to address MVE-linked criminal activity.","PeriodicalId":355254,"journal":{"name":"Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Studies","volume":"269 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19165/2022.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Militia violent extremists (MVEs) pose a growing threat within the United States. MVEs were the most prominent and well-organised participants in the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol and have plotted numerous acts of lethal violence against law enforcement, government officials, and civilians in the past decade. MVEs are motivated by a belief that private citizens must use violence to resist government overreach, combat purported tyranny, or maintain law and order. While participants in the broader militia movement embrace similar beliefs, MVEs are distinguished by their willingness to carry out violence. MVEs typically organise in small local or regional militias, though many movement participants do not affiliate with a specific organisation. The modern militia movement developed at the end of the twentieth century, but social media has transformed the movement's structure and fuelled its growth. Movement members have organised loose umbrella networks at the national level, most notably the Oath Keepers and Three Percenters, while others have coalesced around specific memes or ideas, including the accelerationist Boogaloo movement, border defence, opposition to federal stewardship of public land, and opposition to COVID-19 public health measures. MVE violence has been similarly diverse. In addition to the attack on the US Capitol, MVEs have attempted to kill law enforcement officers, plotted to kidnap government officials, and engaged in multiple standoffs with law enforcement in response to government action. Because the MVE movement is largely domestic, US policymakers have several options for countering this threat. The US government can limit radicalisation through transparency around its domestic activity, thereby countering the anti-authority sentiments and conspiracy theories that fuel the movement. Further, federal legislation targeting militia activity and improved counter-extremism training can provide law enforcement with the tools necessary to address MVE-linked criminal activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国民兵暴力极端分子:了解威胁的演变
民兵暴力极端分子(MVEs)在美国国内构成日益严重的威胁。mve是2021年1月6日美国国会大厦袭击事件中最突出、组织最严密的参与者,在过去十年中,他们策划了许多针对执法部门、政府官员和平民的致命暴力行为。mve的动机是一种信念,即普通公民必须使用暴力来抵制政府越权,打击所谓的暴政,或维护法律和秩序。虽然更广泛的民兵运动的参与者也有类似的信念,但mve的特点是他们愿意实施暴力。mve通常以小型的地方或地区民兵组织,尽管许多运动参与者并不隶属于特定的组织。现代民兵运动发展于20世纪末,但社交媒体改变了该运动的结构并推动了其发展。MVE暴力也同样多种多样。除了袭击美国国会大厦外,MVEs还试图杀害执法人员,策划绑架政府官员,并与执法部门发生多次对峙,以回应政府的行动。由于MVE运动主要发生在国内,美国政策制定者有几种选择来应对这一威胁。美国政府可以通过国内活动的透明度来限制激进化,从而对抗助长这一运动的反权威情绪和阴谋论。此外,针对民兵活动的联邦立法和改进的反极端主义培训可以为执法部门提供必要的工具,以解决与mve相关的犯罪活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Re-Offending by Released Terrorist Prisoners: Separating Hype from Reality The Future of the Islamic State's Women: Assessing Their Potential Threat Violence and Terrorism from the Far-Right: Policy Options to Counter an Elusive Threat Suicide Bombings in Mindanao Repatriation of child returnees from Northeast Syria: A child-rights approach to their management, rehabilitation and reintegration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1