ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL (Studi Perkara Nomor : 11/Pdt.Sus-PJI/2016/PN.Tjk)

Raja Agung Kusuma Arcaropeboka, K. Kurnia, Wiwin Hefrianto
{"title":"ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL (Studi Perkara Nomor : 11/Pdt.Sus-PJI/2016/PN.Tjk)","authors":"Raja Agung Kusuma Arcaropeboka, K. Kurnia, Wiwin Hefrianto","doi":"10.24967/jaeap.v1i02.1693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"135-142 Abstract: Practices that occur in the field are often workers do not get a decent wage, even termination of employment (PHK) resulting in conflicts/disputes. This conflict/dispute is better known as the Industrial Relations Dispute. One of these cases occurred at the Industrial Relations Court at the Class 1A Tanjung Karang District Court between workers and PT. X. This study aims to 1) find out and analyze the basic considerations of the judges of the Industrial Law Court in examining and deciding the case Number: 11/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016/PN.Tjk; and 2) knowing and analyzing the fulfillment of the rights of workers/laborers based on the decision of the judge of the Industrial Relations Court Number: 11/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016/PN.Tjk. The problem approach used in this study is a normative approach and is supported by an empirical approach. The data was obtained using the interview method to 3 sources. The data obtained were then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. that the basis for the consideration of the judges of the industrial relations court in making decisions is based on article 100 of Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning the settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes (PPHI), however, in examining and deciding cases, workers/laborers cannot obtain their rights. In addition, the decision of the Industrial Relations Court in examining and deciding cases does not take into account past legal events in determining the status of workers.","PeriodicalId":126209,"journal":{"name":"Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24967/jaeap.v1i02.1693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

135-142 Abstract: Practices that occur in the field are often workers do not get a decent wage, even termination of employment (PHK) resulting in conflicts/disputes. This conflict/dispute is better known as the Industrial Relations Dispute. One of these cases occurred at the Industrial Relations Court at the Class 1A Tanjung Karang District Court between workers and PT. X. This study aims to 1) find out and analyze the basic considerations of the judges of the Industrial Law Court in examining and deciding the case Number: 11/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016/PN.Tjk; and 2) knowing and analyzing the fulfillment of the rights of workers/laborers based on the decision of the judge of the Industrial Relations Court Number: 11/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016/PN.Tjk. The problem approach used in this study is a normative approach and is supported by an empirical approach. The data was obtained using the interview method to 3 sources. The data obtained were then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. that the basis for the consideration of the judges of the industrial relations court in making decisions is based on article 100 of Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning the settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes (PPHI), however, in examining and deciding cases, workers/laborers cannot obtain their rights. In addition, the decision of the Industrial Relations Court in examining and deciding cases does not take into account past legal events in determining the status of workers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要:在现场发生的做法往往是工人没有得到体面的工资,甚至终止雇佣关系(PHK)导致冲突/纠纷。这种冲突/纠纷更广为人知的名称是劳资关系纠纷。其中一个案例发生在丹戎卡朗地方法院1A类劳资关系法庭,工人与PT. x之间。本研究旨在1)找出并分析劳资关系法庭法官在审查和判决案件编号:11/ pdt . su - phi /2016/PN.Tjk时的基本考虑;2)基于劳资关系法院法官的判决,了解和分析工人/劳动者权利的实现情况(编号:11/ pdt . su - phi /2016/PN.Tjk)。本研究中使用的问题方法是一种规范方法,并得到实证方法的支持。数据采用访谈法获得,共3个来源。然后对获得的数据进行描述性定性分析。劳资关系法院法官在作出决定时考虑的依据是关于解决劳资关系纠纷的2004年第2号法律第100条,然而,在审查和裁决案件时,工人/劳动者无法获得他们的权利。此外,劳资关系法庭在审查和裁决案件时的决定没有考虑到过去在确定工人地位方面的法律事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASPEK YURIDIS PENERAPAN TINDAK PIDANA PENADAHAN PASAL 480 KE-2 KUHP DI ERA MODERN ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG SAMPAH PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN PROSES PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH MELALUI JUAL BELI TANAH YANG TELAH BERSERTIFIKAT OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH ASPEK YURIDIS PENERAPAN TINDAK PIDANA PENADAHAN PASAL 480 KE-2 KUHP DI ERA MODERN ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN DAERAH TENTANG SAMPAH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1