Mythological, Historical and Personal: the Story of Creation of Mary Renault’s Dilogy “Theseus”

M. Artamonova, E. V. Tulina
{"title":"Mythological, Historical and Personal: the Story of Creation of Mary Renault’s Dilogy “Theseus”","authors":"M. Artamonova, E. V. Tulina","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2020-2-209-221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the mythological, historical and personal aspects of the creation of the Theseus dilogy (“The King Must Die”, 1958; “The Bull from the Sea”, 1962) by the English author Mary Renault (1905-1983). The relevance of the study is due to the need to comprehend these mythocentric works, which are the result of the synthesis of various types of artistic mythologism. The study is based on the principles of comparative historical, biographical and historical-genetic methods of analysis of a work of art. The traditions of mythologism in the English literature of the twentieth century are analyzed. The following features are distinguished: the mythological tradition of the twentieth century reflects the pressing issues of our time; modern mythologism implies a change or destruction of the canon. It is stated that the principle of historicity of M. Renault novels is implemented on the basis of archaeological and anthropological works of her contemporaries. It is proved that two types of artistic mythologism are simultaneously used in dilogy: demythologization and remythologization. The authors argue that this approach makes mythogenesis possible within the framework of a realistic narrative. In addition, the question about the implementation of the author’s creative intention to attract public attention to the problems of same-sex relationships is raised.","PeriodicalId":190169,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyy dialog","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyy dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-2-209-221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the mythological, historical and personal aspects of the creation of the Theseus dilogy (“The King Must Die”, 1958; “The Bull from the Sea”, 1962) by the English author Mary Renault (1905-1983). The relevance of the study is due to the need to comprehend these mythocentric works, which are the result of the synthesis of various types of artistic mythologism. The study is based on the principles of comparative historical, biographical and historical-genetic methods of analysis of a work of art. The traditions of mythologism in the English literature of the twentieth century are analyzed. The following features are distinguished: the mythological tradition of the twentieth century reflects the pressing issues of our time; modern mythologism implies a change or destruction of the canon. It is stated that the principle of historicity of M. Renault novels is implemented on the basis of archaeological and anthropological works of her contemporaries. It is proved that two types of artistic mythologism are simultaneously used in dilogy: demythologization and remythologization. The authors argue that this approach makes mythogenesis possible within the framework of a realistic narrative. In addition, the question about the implementation of the author’s creative intention to attract public attention to the problems of same-sex relationships is raised.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神话、历史与个人:玛丽·雷诺《忒修斯》的创作故事
本文致力于从神话、历史和个人的角度探讨忒修斯三部曲的创作(《国王必须死》,1958;英国作家玛丽·雷诺(Mary Renault, 1905-1983)的《海上来的公牛》(1962)。研究的相关性是由于需要理解这些以神话为中心的作品,它们是各种艺术神话主义综合的结果。这项研究是基于比较历史、传记和历史遗传学方法的原则来分析一件艺术品。分析了20世纪英国文学中神话主义的传统。其特点是:20世纪的神话传统反映了我们这个时代的紧迫问题;现代神话暗示着正典的改变或毁灭。雷诺小说的历史性原则是在其同时代的考古学和人类学作品的基础上实现的。事实证明,两种类型的艺术神话在文学中同时存在:去神话化和再神话化。作者认为,这种方法使神话产生在现实主义叙事的框架内成为可能。此外,作者的创作意图是为了引起公众对同性关系问题的关注,这一意图的实现也引发了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Linguistic Means of Expressing Objective Epistemic Modality in Scientific Discourse Activities of Provincial Medical Inspectors in Western Siberia in the Late XIX - Early XX Centuries Cross-Cultural Communication: Its Asymmetry and Authenticity Development of Prepositional-Nominal Combination of a Noun in Modern Russian: Analytics in Grammatical System of Russian Language Образование как инструмент российской «мягкой силы» в российско-монгольских отношениях в конце ХХ - начале ХХI веков
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1