Effect of soil type on tungsten leachability.

G. O’Connor, S. Larson, C. Griggs, M. Thompson, C. Nestler
{"title":"Effect of soil type on tungsten leachability.","authors":"G. O’Connor, S. Larson, C. Griggs, M. Thompson, C. Nestler","doi":"10.2462/09670513.924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to evaluate the potential loss of tungsten associated with small-arms ammunition from range soils into leachate and runoff water, preand post-firing soils were subjected to three leaching/ extraction techniques: the distilled, deionized water suspend and settle (DDI SS the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP); and the sequential extraction (SE) procedure. The SE, and, to a lesser extent, the TCLP extraction, were not effective for evaluating tungsten mobility, because of the inverse relationship between acidity and the solubility of tungsten species. However, results from DDI S&S tests and the exchangeable SE fraction do provide some information about the potential for migration of tungsten from soil. The concentration of tungsten obtained using the DDI S&S procedure was highest in leachates from Sand and Glacial Till and lowest in leachate from Muck. The two soil types (Sand and Glacial Till) that exhibited high leachability in the DDI S&S leaching procedure also produced SE-exchangeable extraction solutions that contained the highest tungsten concentrations. Because of the unique properties of elemental tungsten with regard to oxidation and dissolution in aqueous solutions, TCLP and the acid-derived SE procedure are less useful for predicting the long-term leachability of tungsten than the DDI S&S procedure.","PeriodicalId":336428,"journal":{"name":"Land Contamination & Reclamation","volume":"4 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Contamination & Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2462/09670513.924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In order to evaluate the potential loss of tungsten associated with small-arms ammunition from range soils into leachate and runoff water, preand post-firing soils were subjected to three leaching/ extraction techniques: the distilled, deionized water suspend and settle (DDI SS the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP); and the sequential extraction (SE) procedure. The SE, and, to a lesser extent, the TCLP extraction, were not effective for evaluating tungsten mobility, because of the inverse relationship between acidity and the solubility of tungsten species. However, results from DDI S&S tests and the exchangeable SE fraction do provide some information about the potential for migration of tungsten from soil. The concentration of tungsten obtained using the DDI S&S procedure was highest in leachates from Sand and Glacial Till and lowest in leachate from Muck. The two soil types (Sand and Glacial Till) that exhibited high leachability in the DDI S&S leaching procedure also produced SE-exchangeable extraction solutions that contained the highest tungsten concentrations. Because of the unique properties of elemental tungsten with regard to oxidation and dissolution in aqueous solutions, TCLP and the acid-derived SE procedure are less useful for predicting the long-term leachability of tungsten than the DDI S&S procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤类型对钨浸出性的影响。
为了评估与轻武器弹药有关的钨从靶场土壤进入渗滤液和径流水中的潜在损失,对射击前和射击后的土壤进行了三种浸出/提取技术:蒸馏水、去离子水悬浮和沉淀(DDI SS)毒性特征浸出程序(TCLP);和顺序提取(SE)程序。由于酸度与钨的溶解度成反比关系,SE和TCLP萃取(在较小程度上)都不能有效评价钨的迁移率。然而,DDI S&S测试结果和可交换SE分数确实提供了一些关于钨从土壤迁移潜力的信息。采用DDI S&S法获得的钨浓度在砂和冰碛物的渗滤液中最高,在淤泥的渗滤液中最低。在DDI和s浸出过程中表现出高浸出性的两种土壤类型(砂和冰耕)也产生了含有最高钨浓度的硒交换萃取溶液。由于单质钨在水溶液中氧化和溶解方面的独特性质,TCLP和酸衍生SE方法在预测钨的长期浸出能力方面不如DDI S&S方法有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surfactant-enhanced soil washing for the remediation of sites contaminated with pesticides. Cheby or not Cheby? Is that the question? Alternative integration procedures in combining multiple exposure routes for the derivation of generic assessment criteria with the CLEA model. Contaminated land risk assessment: variability in site assessment and decision making in the UK. New technologies for long-term protection of drinking-water resources from landfill emissions - investigation, containment and targeted material conversion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1