Writing as a Process in Teacher Education: Analysis of a Didactic Sequence

Maria Izabel Rodrigues Tognato, J. Dolz
{"title":"Writing as a Process in Teacher Education: Analysis of a Didactic Sequence","authors":"Maria Izabel Rodrigues Tognato, J. Dolz","doi":"10.37514/int-b.2019.0421.2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents the results of an implementation and the analysis of a didactic sequence in the language teacher education aiming to discuss the possible reconfigurations in the formative practices focused on writing as a process and the knowledge necessary to teacher education. For this, we grounded our studies on the theoretical assumptions of Sociodiscursive Interactionism (sdi) (Bronckart, 1997/2009), the genre-based approach to language teaching (Bakhtin, 2003; Schneuwly & Dolz, 2004), language capacities (Schneuwly & Dolz, 2004; Cristovão, 2009, 2013; Cristovão & Stutz, 2011; Stutz & Cristovão, 2011), the procedure of Didactic Sequence (Dolz, Noverraz &, Schneuwly, 2004), conceptions of writing and rewriting (Menegassi, 2005; 2010; Dolz, Gagnon & Decândio, 2010; Beato-Canato, 2008; Beato-Canato & * This work is a result of post-doctoral research developed at unige-University of Geneva-fapseFaculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Education, supervised by the professor Dr. Joaquim Dolz, to whom I am very grateful for the partnership and collaboration, subsidized by the scholarship system capes, process number bex 0767-15-8. ** University of Geneva, Switzerland. I am very grateful to Professor Joaquim Dolz for this special partnership. E-mail: belinhatog@yahoo.com.br *** Universidade Estadual do Paraná, Campo Mourão, Brazil. We are grateful to Professor Charles Bazerman for his intellectual guidance, insightful and valuable criticism. We also thank Professor Marileuza Ascencio Miquelante for her valuable reading of this work and her contributions. E-mail: joaquim.dolz-mestre@unige.ch 256 | Maria Izabel Rodrigues Tognato & Joaquim Dolz Cristovão, 2014) and the knowledge to be taught and the knowledge for teaching (Hofstetter & Schneuwly, 2009). A didactic sequence focused on writing was implemented and analyzed in the English language initial teacher education context at unespar-Universidade Estadual do Paraná-Campus de Campo Mourão-pr, in Brazil, in 2015. Some future teachers’ initial and final papers were analyzed in order to identify some aspects of their learning and education processes. The critical analysis of the didactic sequence implemented and the future teachers’ written productions allowed us to reflect on the future teachers’ learning and development needs and the necessary knowledge to the formative practices, revealing that the work with writing as a process, the articulation among different textual genres, and the necessary adjustments to the didactic sequence can be significant tools to the development of teacher’s argumentative and professional capacities.","PeriodicalId":106018,"journal":{"name":"Conocer la Escritura: Investigaci�n M�s All� de las Frontera | Knowing Writing: Writing Research Across Borders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conocer la Escritura: Investigaci�n M�s All� de las Frontera | Knowing Writing: Writing Research Across Borders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/int-b.2019.0421.2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents the results of an implementation and the analysis of a didactic sequence in the language teacher education aiming to discuss the possible reconfigurations in the formative practices focused on writing as a process and the knowledge necessary to teacher education. For this, we grounded our studies on the theoretical assumptions of Sociodiscursive Interactionism (sdi) (Bronckart, 1997/2009), the genre-based approach to language teaching (Bakhtin, 2003; Schneuwly & Dolz, 2004), language capacities (Schneuwly & Dolz, 2004; Cristovão, 2009, 2013; Cristovão & Stutz, 2011; Stutz & Cristovão, 2011), the procedure of Didactic Sequence (Dolz, Noverraz &, Schneuwly, 2004), conceptions of writing and rewriting (Menegassi, 2005; 2010; Dolz, Gagnon & Decândio, 2010; Beato-Canato, 2008; Beato-Canato & * This work is a result of post-doctoral research developed at unige-University of Geneva-fapseFaculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Education, supervised by the professor Dr. Joaquim Dolz, to whom I am very grateful for the partnership and collaboration, subsidized by the scholarship system capes, process number bex 0767-15-8. ** University of Geneva, Switzerland. I am very grateful to Professor Joaquim Dolz for this special partnership. E-mail: belinhatog@yahoo.com.br *** Universidade Estadual do Paraná, Campo Mourão, Brazil. We are grateful to Professor Charles Bazerman for his intellectual guidance, insightful and valuable criticism. We also thank Professor Marileuza Ascencio Miquelante for her valuable reading of this work and her contributions. E-mail: joaquim.dolz-mestre@unige.ch 256 | Maria Izabel Rodrigues Tognato & Joaquim Dolz Cristovão, 2014) and the knowledge to be taught and the knowledge for teaching (Hofstetter & Schneuwly, 2009). A didactic sequence focused on writing was implemented and analyzed in the English language initial teacher education context at unespar-Universidade Estadual do Paraná-Campus de Campo Mourão-pr, in Brazil, in 2015. Some future teachers’ initial and final papers were analyzed in order to identify some aspects of their learning and education processes. The critical analysis of the didactic sequence implemented and the future teachers’ written productions allowed us to reflect on the future teachers’ learning and development needs and the necessary knowledge to the formative practices, revealing that the work with writing as a process, the articulation among different textual genres, and the necessary adjustments to the didactic sequence can be significant tools to the development of teacher’s argumentative and professional capacities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为教师教育过程的写作:一个教学序列的分析
本研究提出了在语言教师教育中实施和分析教学序列的结果,旨在讨论以写作为过程和教师教育所必需的知识为重点的形成实践中的可能重构。为此,我们的研究基于社会话语互动主义(sdi)的理论假设(Bronckart, 1997/2009),基于体裁的语言教学方法(Bakhtin, 2003;Schneuwly & Dolz, 2004),语言能力(Schneuwly & Dolz, 2004;cristov, 2009, 2013;cristov & Stutz, 2011;Stutz & cristov, 2011),教学顺序的程序(Dolz, Noverraz &, Schneuwly, 2004),写作和重写的概念(Menegassi, 2005;2010;Dolz, Gagnon & decndio, 2010;Beato-Canato, 2008;这项工作是日内瓦大学心理学和教育科学学院博士后研究的成果,由Joaquim Dolz教授指导,我非常感谢他的合作和合作,由奖学金系统capes资助,流程号为0767-15-8。**瑞士日内瓦大学。我非常感谢Joaquim Dolz教授的这种特殊合作关系。E-mail: belinhatog@yahoo.com.br ***巴西Campo mour, universsidade Estadual do paran。我们感谢查尔斯·巴泽曼教授的知识指导、富有洞察力和宝贵的批评。我们还要感谢玛丽列扎·阿森西奥·米奎兰特教授对这项工作的宝贵阅读和她的贡献。E-mail: joaquim.dolz-mestre@unige.ch 256 | Maria Izabel Rodrigues Tognato & Joaquim Dolz cristov, 2014)以及要教授的知识和用于教学的知识(Hofstetter & Schneuwly, 2009)。2015年,在巴西unespar- universsidade Estadual Paraná-Campus de Campo mouro -pr的英语初级教师教育背景下,实施并分析了以写作为重点的教学序列。我们分析了一些未来教师的初始和期末论文,以确定他们的学习和教育过程的某些方面。通过对实施的教学顺序和未来教师的书面作品的批判性分析,我们可以反思未来教师的学习和发展需求以及形成实践所需的知识,揭示以写作为过程的工作,不同文本类型之间的衔接以及对教学顺序的必要调整可以成为教师论证能力和专业能力发展的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recorrido en busca de la funci�n epist�mica de la lectura y la escritura en Ingenier�a Estructural Perception and Recognition of Textual Genres: A Phenomenological Approach Escribir para aprender en ingenier�a. Una lente que hace visible el pensamiento matem�tico A Classroom Languaculture Offers Perspectives for Learning a New Genre Inscribing the World into Knowledge: Data and Evidence in Disciplinary Academic Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1