The gender gap in mathematics achievement: Evidence from Italian data

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Education Review Pub Date : 2017-06-01 Epub Date: 2017-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.03.001
Dalit Contini , Maria Laura Di Tommaso , Silvia Mendolia
{"title":"The gender gap in mathematics achievement: Evidence from Italian data","authors":"Dalit Contini ,&nbsp;Maria Laura Di Tommaso ,&nbsp;Silvia Mendolia","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gender differences in the STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) disciplines are widespread in most OECD countries and mathematics is the only subject where girls tend to underperform with respect to boys. This paper analyses the gender gap in math test scores in Italy, which is one of the countries displaying the largest differential between boys and girls, according to the latest Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). We use data from an Italian national level learning assessment, involving children in selected grades from second to tenth, and analyse the gender gap in mathematics test scores using OLS, school fixed effects, quantile regression, metric free and dynamic pseudo-panel models. Our results show that girls systematically underperform boys, even after controlling for an array of individual and family background characteristics. The average gender gap increases with children's age, is larger among top performing children, and girls keep losing ground relative to boys when progressing in the education system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 32-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.03.001","citationCount":"99","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775716303466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

Abstract

Gender differences in the STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) disciplines are widespread in most OECD countries and mathematics is the only subject where girls tend to underperform with respect to boys. This paper analyses the gender gap in math test scores in Italy, which is one of the countries displaying the largest differential between boys and girls, according to the latest Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). We use data from an Italian national level learning assessment, involving children in selected grades from second to tenth, and analyse the gender gap in mathematics test scores using OLS, school fixed effects, quantile regression, metric free and dynamic pseudo-panel models. Our results show that girls systematically underperform boys, even after controlling for an array of individual and family background characteristics. The average gender gap increases with children's age, is larger among top performing children, and girls keep losing ground relative to boys when progressing in the education system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数学成绩的性别差异:来自意大利数据的证据
STEM(科学技术工程和数学)学科的性别差异在大多数经合组织国家普遍存在,数学是女孩相对于男孩表现不佳的唯一学科。根据最新的国际学生评估项目(PISA),意大利是男女数学考试成绩差距最大的国家之一,本文分析了意大利数学考试成绩的性别差距。我们使用意大利国家水平学习评估的数据,涉及从二年级到十年级的儿童,并使用OLS,学校固定效应,分位数回归,度量自由和动态伪面板模型分析数学考试成绩的性别差距。我们的研究结果表明,即使在控制了一系列个人和家庭背景特征之后,女孩的表现也系统性地落后于男孩。平均性别差距随着儿童年龄的增长而扩大,在表现最好的儿童中差距更大,在教育系统的进步中,女孩相对于男孩一直处于劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the gap: The effect of National Operational Program (PON) on primary school performance Editorial Board Closing early math gaps by parental education with technology at home From teacher quality to teaching quality: Instructional productivity and teaching practices Wage returns to human capital resulting from an extra year of primary school: Evidence from Egypt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1