Issues and Challenges in Teaching SE, IT, IS and EC

K. Chin
{"title":"Issues and Challenges in Teaching SE, IT, IS and EC","authors":"K. Chin","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2008.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching and learning for the degrees of Software Engineering(SE), Computer Science(CS), Information Technology (IT), Information Systems (IS) and Electronic Commerce (EC), with recent trends in Business IT, Management of Information Systems (MIS) or Information Communication Technology (ICT) and so forth are often confused by staff and students. These new disciplines, which have emerged over the last 30 years, strongly overlap each other. New disciplines like IS and EC are not clearly defined and are often confused with other related fields such as CS, CE and SE. The lack of standard curriculum amongst Australian IT, IS and EC programmes adds further confusion to the CS and SE programmes. Professional bodies such as IEEE, ACM, AIS and the like have been developing model curricula as a guide for universities that wish to obtain accreditation for their CS, SE and IT/IS courses. They normally make up core topics and a list of electives that are guided by intended SE, CS, IT, IS and EC career tracks. The purpose of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of USA, UK and Australian academic programmes against the proposed curriculum structure. It is envisage that the result of this study will provide a baseline in guiding curriculum evaluation and revision for Australian and international universities' computing and IT related courses. Education in the computing/IT related areas are currently facing the global challenges of declining interest, low student enrolment and the increasing demand of computing/IT skilled workers in industry and commerce. The disappearance of CS, SE, IS into Science, IT or Electrical Engineering add confusion for prospective students and industry employers. The disciplines of SE, CS, IT, IS and EC, are now facing the increasing challenges in survival, and they need to be clearly re-defining themselves in order to survive into the 2020s. This paper describes the issues and challenges in teaching and learning these disciplines and identifies the possible causes and possible sustainable solution for ICT educators.","PeriodicalId":231903,"journal":{"name":"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2008.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Teaching and learning for the degrees of Software Engineering(SE), Computer Science(CS), Information Technology (IT), Information Systems (IS) and Electronic Commerce (EC), with recent trends in Business IT, Management of Information Systems (MIS) or Information Communication Technology (ICT) and so forth are often confused by staff and students. These new disciplines, which have emerged over the last 30 years, strongly overlap each other. New disciplines like IS and EC are not clearly defined and are often confused with other related fields such as CS, CE and SE. The lack of standard curriculum amongst Australian IT, IS and EC programmes adds further confusion to the CS and SE programmes. Professional bodies such as IEEE, ACM, AIS and the like have been developing model curricula as a guide for universities that wish to obtain accreditation for their CS, SE and IT/IS courses. They normally make up core topics and a list of electives that are guided by intended SE, CS, IT, IS and EC career tracks. The purpose of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of USA, UK and Australian academic programmes against the proposed curriculum structure. It is envisage that the result of this study will provide a baseline in guiding curriculum evaluation and revision for Australian and international universities' computing and IT related courses. Education in the computing/IT related areas are currently facing the global challenges of declining interest, low student enrolment and the increasing demand of computing/IT skilled workers in industry and commerce. The disappearance of CS, SE, IS into Science, IT or Electrical Engineering add confusion for prospective students and industry employers. The disciplines of SE, CS, IT, IS and EC, are now facing the increasing challenges in survival, and they need to be clearly re-defining themselves in order to survive into the 2020s. This paper describes the issues and challenges in teaching and learning these disciplines and identifies the possible causes and possible sustainable solution for ICT educators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SE, IT, IS和EC教学中的问题和挑战
软件工程(SE)、计算机科学(CS)、信息技术(IT)、信息系统(IS)和电子商务(EC)学位的教与学,以及商业信息技术、信息系统管理(MIS)或信息通信技术(ICT)等方面的最新趋势,常常让教职员和学生感到困惑。这些新学科在过去30年里出现,彼此之间有很大的重叠。像IS和EC这样的新学科没有明确的定义,经常与其他相关领域如CS、CE和SE混淆。澳大利亚IT、IS和EC课程缺乏标准课程,这进一步增加了CS和SE课程的混乱。IEEE、ACM、AIS等专业团体一直在开发示范课程,作为希望获得计算机科学、计算机科学和信息技术/信息系统课程认证的大学的指南。它们通常由核心主题和一系列选修课程组成,这些课程以SE、CS、IT、IS和EC的职业轨迹为指导。本研究的目的是针对拟议的课程结构对美国、英国和澳大利亚的学术课程进行比较分析。预期本研究结果将为澳洲及国际大学的电脑及资讯科技相关课程的课程评估及修订提供基准。计算机/信息技术相关领域的教育目前正面临着兴趣下降、学生入学率低以及工业和商业对计算机/信息技术熟练工人需求增加的全球性挑战。计算机科学、计算机科学、计算机科学、计算机科学等学科的消失,给未来的学生和行业雇主增加了困惑。SE、CS、IT、IS和EC等学科现在面临着越来越多的生存挑战,为了在21世纪20年代生存下去,它们需要明确地重新定义自己。本文描述了这些学科教学中的问题和挑战,并确定了可能的原因和ICT教育工作者可能的可持续解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated Derivation of Speech Interfaces: A Model-Based Approach Indexing the Java API Using Source Code A Framework for Requirements Engineering PRocess DEvelopment (FRERE) An Ontology Framework for Managing Security Attacks and Defences in Component Based Software Systems Embedding Architectural Practices into Extreme Programming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1