Validation of James Whetstone's Measure of Amaxophobia

James Paul Whetstone, Z. Cernovsky, S. Tenenbaum, Gabriela Poggi, Andrew Sidhu, M. Istasy, Manfred Dreer
{"title":"Validation of James Whetstone's Measure of Amaxophobia","authors":"James Paul Whetstone, Z. Cernovsky, S. Tenenbaum, Gabriela Poggi, Andrew Sidhu, M. Istasy, Manfred Dreer","doi":"10.22259/2638-5201.0301003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Whetstone’s Vehicle Anxiety Questionnaire is a 31 item measure of driving anxiety (amaxophobia) as common in survivors of motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). Method: Scores on Whetstone’s questionnaire were available for 53 survivors of car accidents (mean age 40.2 years, SD=13.6, 15 men, 38 women). Their scores on the Driving Anxiety Questionnaire and on Steiner’s Automobile Anxiety Inventory were also available, as well as scores on measures of PTSD (PCL-5), and on scales of post-concussive and whiplash symptoms, pain, insomnia, depression, and anxiety. Whetstone’s scores were also available for 24 normal persons (mean age 51.7 years, SD=17.5, 14 men, 10 women) who were never injured in a serious car accident. Results and Discussion: With respect to criterion validity, Whetstone’s scores were significantly higher (r=.88) in the patients than in the controls. The highest Whetstone score of the controls was 19 and the lowest of the patients was 23: there was no overlap between the two groups. With respect to convergent validity, high correlations were found of Whetstone questionnaire to the Driving Anxiety Questionnaire (r=.80) and to the PCL-5 measure of PTSD symptoms (r=.78). Whetstone scores were found to be also highly correlated with the post-concussion syndrome (r=.63) and moderately with whiplash symptoms (r=.46), post-MVA insomnia (r=.56), ratings of post-MVA pain (rs ranging from .43 to .51), and ratings of depression (r=.40) and of generalized anxiety (r=.43). Significant correlation was also found of Whetstone to Steiner’s Automobile Anxiety Inventory (r=.45). Conclusion: The results indicate an excellent criterion validity and convergent validity of Whetstone’s Vehicle Anxiety Questionnaire as a clinical assessment tool for amaxophobia.","PeriodicalId":270484,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22259/2638-5201.0301003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Whetstone’s Vehicle Anxiety Questionnaire is a 31 item measure of driving anxiety (amaxophobia) as common in survivors of motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). Method: Scores on Whetstone’s questionnaire were available for 53 survivors of car accidents (mean age 40.2 years, SD=13.6, 15 men, 38 women). Their scores on the Driving Anxiety Questionnaire and on Steiner’s Automobile Anxiety Inventory were also available, as well as scores on measures of PTSD (PCL-5), and on scales of post-concussive and whiplash symptoms, pain, insomnia, depression, and anxiety. Whetstone’s scores were also available for 24 normal persons (mean age 51.7 years, SD=17.5, 14 men, 10 women) who were never injured in a serious car accident. Results and Discussion: With respect to criterion validity, Whetstone’s scores were significantly higher (r=.88) in the patients than in the controls. The highest Whetstone score of the controls was 19 and the lowest of the patients was 23: there was no overlap between the two groups. With respect to convergent validity, high correlations were found of Whetstone questionnaire to the Driving Anxiety Questionnaire (r=.80) and to the PCL-5 measure of PTSD symptoms (r=.78). Whetstone scores were found to be also highly correlated with the post-concussion syndrome (r=.63) and moderately with whiplash symptoms (r=.46), post-MVA insomnia (r=.56), ratings of post-MVA pain (rs ranging from .43 to .51), and ratings of depression (r=.40) and of generalized anxiety (r=.43). Significant correlation was also found of Whetstone to Steiner’s Automobile Anxiety Inventory (r=.45). Conclusion: The results indicate an excellent criterion validity and convergent validity of Whetstone’s Vehicle Anxiety Questionnaire as a clinical assessment tool for amaxophobia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
詹姆斯·惠特斯通的网络恐惧症测量方法的验证
背景:威特斯通车辆焦虑问卷是一份包含31个项目的机动车事故(MVAs)幸存者常见的驾驶焦虑(恐车症)量表。方法:对53例车祸幸存者(平均年龄40.2岁,SD=13.6,男性15例,女性38例)进行问卷调查。他们在驾驶焦虑问卷和斯坦纳汽车焦虑量表上的得分,以及PTSD (PCL-5)的测量得分,以及脑震荡后和鞭打症状、疼痛、失眠、抑郁和焦虑的量表得分。wheetstone评分也适用于24名从未在严重车祸中受伤的正常人(平均年龄51.7岁,SD=17.5, 14名男性,10名女性)。结果与讨论:在标准效度方面,患者的wheetstone评分显著高于对照组(r= 0.88)。对照组Whetstone评分最高为19分,患者最低为23分,两组无重叠。在收敛效度方面,wheetstone问卷与驾驶焦虑问卷(r= 0.80)和PTSD症状PCL-5量表(r= 0.78)存在高度相关。wheetstone评分还与脑震荡后综合征(r= 0.63)高度相关,中度与鞭打症状(r= 0.46)、mva后失眠(r= 0.56)、mva后疼痛评分(r= 0.43至0.51)、抑郁评分(r= 0.40)和广泛性焦虑评分(r= 0.43)密切相关。wheetstone与Steiner的汽车焦虑量表也存在显著相关(r= 0.45)。结论:wheetstone车辆焦虑问卷具有良好的标准效度和收敛效度,可作为amax恐惧症的临床评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Olanzapine-Induced Tardive Oculogyric Crisis Associated With Paroxysmal Psychiatric Symptoms: A Diagnostic Dilemma Paucity of Derealization and Depersonalization Signs in Chronic Schizophrenia Pseudodiagnoses of Malingering of Neuropsychological Symptoms in Survivors of Car Accidents by the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology Substance Abuse and Stress Levels in Canadian University Students Irremediably Flawed Nature of Analog Validation Methodology of Malingering Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1