The Clinical Results of Pressurized Cement-Augmented Richard Compression Hip Screw with Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate for Intertrochanteric Fracture Compared with Pressurized Cement-Augmented Richard Compression Hip Screw Only

K. J. Rhee, Eun Sang Lee, T. Kim, Y. Woo, S. Kwon
{"title":"The Clinical Results of Pressurized Cement-Augmented Richard Compression Hip Screw with Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate for Intertrochanteric Fracture Compared with Pressurized Cement-Augmented Richard Compression Hip Screw Only","authors":"K. J. Rhee, Eun Sang Lee, T. Kim, Y. Woo, S. Kwon","doi":"10.5371/JKHS.2011.23.4.290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We analyzed the radiologic and clinical outcomes of osteosynthesis using a Richard compression hip screw (RCHS) alone or RCHS with a trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) in patients with an intertrochanteric fracture. Materials and Methods: From January 2006 to December 2008, 23 patients (23 cases) underwent osteosynthesis using only RCHS and 24 patients (25 cases) underwent osteosynthesis using RCHS and TSP. We evaluated the classification of fractures, the amount of collapse and shortening, and the duration of fracture union. We used a Koval classification for the evaluation of clinical outcomes. Results: The amount of collapse and shortening in the RCHS-only group was statistically greater than the amount in the RCHS-with-TSP group. The union duration of fracture was 5.3 months in the RCHS-only group and 6.6 months in the RCHS-with-TSP group. The clinical outcomes in the RCHS-with TSP-group were better than the RCHS-only group. We had one case of fixation failure in the RCHS-only group and none in the RCHS-with-TSP group. There were no perioperative systemic complications or death. Conclusion: In patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, we can prevent the cut out of the lag screw or screw loosening with the use of pressurized PMMA-augmented RCHS. However, we cannot prevent excessive collapse and shortening, especially in patients with severe osteoporosis, a small diameter of the femur neck, or concealed fractures. In the case of these patients, we recommend you to use RCHS with TSP for the prevention of excessive collapse and shortening.","PeriodicalId":410202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2011.23.4.290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We analyzed the radiologic and clinical outcomes of osteosynthesis using a Richard compression hip screw (RCHS) alone or RCHS with a trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) in patients with an intertrochanteric fracture. Materials and Methods: From January 2006 to December 2008, 23 patients (23 cases) underwent osteosynthesis using only RCHS and 24 patients (25 cases) underwent osteosynthesis using RCHS and TSP. We evaluated the classification of fractures, the amount of collapse and shortening, and the duration of fracture union. We used a Koval classification for the evaluation of clinical outcomes. Results: The amount of collapse and shortening in the RCHS-only group was statistically greater than the amount in the RCHS-with-TSP group. The union duration of fracture was 5.3 months in the RCHS-only group and 6.6 months in the RCHS-with-TSP group. The clinical outcomes in the RCHS-with TSP-group were better than the RCHS-only group. We had one case of fixation failure in the RCHS-only group and none in the RCHS-with-TSP group. There were no perioperative systemic complications or death. Conclusion: In patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, we can prevent the cut out of the lag screw or screw loosening with the use of pressurized PMMA-augmented RCHS. However, we cannot prevent excessive collapse and shortening, especially in patients with severe osteoporosis, a small diameter of the femur neck, or concealed fractures. In the case of these patients, we recommend you to use RCHS with TSP for the prevention of excessive collapse and shortening.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加压水泥增强Richard加压髋螺钉加粗隆稳定钢板治疗粗隆间骨折与单纯加压水泥增强Richard加压髋螺钉比较的临床效果
目的:我们分析使用Richard加压髋螺钉(RCHS)或RCHS联合转子稳定钢板(TSP)治疗转子间骨折患者的放射学和临床结果。材料与方法:2006年1月至2008年12月,23例(23例)患者仅行RCHS骨固定,24例(25例)患者行RCHS联合TSP骨固定。我们评估了骨折的分类、塌陷和缩短的数量以及骨折愈合的时间。我们使用Koval分类来评估临床结果。结果:单用rchs组的塌陷和缩短量明显大于rchs - tsp组。仅rchs组骨折愈合时间为5.3个月,rchs联合tsp组骨折愈合时间为6.6个月。rchs -合并tsp组临床结果优于rchs -单独组。仅rchs组有1例固定失败,而rchs联合tsp组无一例。无围手术期全身性并发症及死亡。结论:在不稳定的转子间骨折患者中,应用加压pmma增强RCHS可防止拉力螺钉切出或螺钉松动。然而,我们不能防止过度塌陷和缩短,特别是在严重骨质疏松症,股骨颈直径小,或隐蔽性骨折的患者。在这些患者的情况下,我们建议您使用RCHS与TSP,以防止过度塌陷和缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Aim of Medicine Comparative Analysis of Two Cementless Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasties in Patients with Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head - Summit® Stem and Bencox® Stem - Repeated Ceramic Head Fracture after Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Dysplastic Hips Hip Arthroplasty Using Collarless Polished Tapered Stem -Minimum 2 Years Follow-up Results-
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1