Disharmonization beetwen Constitutional Court and Supreme Court Regarding Illicit Material on the Corruption Reviewed Concept of Pancasila Justice

Abstract

The writing of this article is to discuss and analyze the disharmony problem between the decision of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the scope of applying illicit material of corruption in Indonesia. Writing methodology use the doctrinal juridical approach. The constitutional court of the Republic of Indonesia stated that the explanation of Article 2 paragraph 1 illicit material in a positive function does not apply, but by the Supreme Court was re-applied based on the doctrine of La doctrine du Sen-Clair on the basis of the Indonesian judicial power law. of course in the disharmony, a regulation of judicial power and its limitations is needed in order to achieve the Pancasila justice which is the Ideology of the Unitary State of Indonesia. KeywordsDisharmonization, Illicit Material, Pancasila