Mediaregulation in the System of Information Law: a Legal Context of Creating Media Regulation Mechanisms

T. Prystupenko
{"title":"Mediaregulation in the System of Information Law: a Legal Context of Creating Media Regulation Mechanisms","authors":"T. Prystupenko","doi":"10.17721/2522-1272.2022.81.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three components of the media regulation mechanism, namely state regulation, joint regulation and self-regulation are identified. The international and domestic normative legal framework for implementation of state regulation of means of mass communication is considered. The problem of the lack of clear structuring and the outdated nature of legislation in the sphere of regulation of means of mass communication is highlighted. The characteristics of changes in the Ukrainian legislation regarding the activities of mass media and journalists after the start of Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine are presented. The peculiarities of regulation of media activities by the draft Law “On Media” during the armed aggression are highlighted. The advantages and disadvantages of the draft law “On Media” in the edition of July 27, 2022 are summarized. The importance of legislative consolidation of the mechanism of online media regulation, including Telegram news channels, is substantiated. The key requirements for adaptation of the Ukrainian media legislation to the requirements of the EU legislation are highlighted. The peculiarities of legal support of the institute of joint regulation in the draft law “On Media” have been studied. The content of self-regulation as a tool of the media regulation mechanism is revealed, the characteristics of the components of self-regulation tool, in particular ethical codes of journalists, professional standards, recommendations for covering certain categories of events, rules of conduct during the armed conflicts are presented. The importance of legislative consolidation of self-regulation in the work of means of mass communication is substantiated.","PeriodicalId":328436,"journal":{"name":"Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2522-1272.2022.81.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three components of the media regulation mechanism, namely state regulation, joint regulation and self-regulation are identified. The international and domestic normative legal framework for implementation of state regulation of means of mass communication is considered. The problem of the lack of clear structuring and the outdated nature of legislation in the sphere of regulation of means of mass communication is highlighted. The characteristics of changes in the Ukrainian legislation regarding the activities of mass media and journalists after the start of Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine are presented. The peculiarities of regulation of media activities by the draft Law “On Media” during the armed aggression are highlighted. The advantages and disadvantages of the draft law “On Media” in the edition of July 27, 2022 are summarized. The importance of legislative consolidation of the mechanism of online media regulation, including Telegram news channels, is substantiated. The key requirements for adaptation of the Ukrainian media legislation to the requirements of the EU legislation are highlighted. The peculiarities of legal support of the institute of joint regulation in the draft law “On Media” have been studied. The content of self-regulation as a tool of the media regulation mechanism is revealed, the characteristics of the components of self-regulation tool, in particular ethical codes of journalists, professional standards, recommendations for covering certain categories of events, rules of conduct during the armed conflicts are presented. The importance of legislative consolidation of self-regulation in the work of means of mass communication is substantiated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息法律体系下的媒体规制:媒介规制机制创设的法律语境
确定了媒介监管机制的三个组成部分,即国家监管、联合监管和自我监管。考虑了实施国家对大众传播手段监管的国际和国内规范性法律框架。在管制大众传播手段方面缺乏明确的结构和立法过时的问题得到突出。介绍了俄罗斯开始对乌克兰进行军事侵略后,乌克兰关于大众传播媒介和记者活动的立法变化的特点。强调了“媒体法”草案在武装侵略期间对媒体活动进行规制的特殊性。总结2022年7月27日版《媒体法》草案的利弊。立法巩固包括Telegram新闻频道在内的网络媒体监管机制的重要性得到了证实。强调了使乌克兰媒体立法适应欧盟立法要求的关键要求。对《媒体法》草案中共同规制制度的法律支持特点进行了研究。本文揭示了作为媒体监管机制工具的自我监管的内容,介绍了自我监管工具组成部分的特点,特别是记者的道德准则、专业标准、报道某些类别事件的建议、武装冲突期间的行为规则。通过立法巩固大众传播媒介工作自律的重要性得到了印证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orthographic and Semantic Anormative Lexis in Publicistic Texts of Cultural-Linguistic Area Art Book in the Theoretical Dimension and Practice System of the Editor Analysis of Approaches to the Impact of Internet Com-munication on the Individual: Trends and Factors Anthropocentrism in Ukrainian Social Journalism Government Communications in Terms of Coronavirus Pandemic on the Example of Novi Sanzhary Events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1