Paleoecological Implications of Trematode-Induced Pit Size in Chamelea Gallina from the Adriatic Sea, Italy

E. Fitzgerald, D. Scarponi, J. Huntley
{"title":"Paleoecological Implications of Trematode-Induced Pit Size in Chamelea Gallina from the Adriatic Sea, Italy","authors":"E. Fitzgerald, D. Scarponi, J. Huntley","doi":"10.58782/flmnh.gvjd1610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gymnophallid trematodes are complex life cycle parasites that induce characteristic pits in their bivalve intermediate hosts, which serve as their sole fossil record. Previous work demonstrated that trematode prevalence increases with rising sea levels, but little has been done to investigate patterns of trematode pit size in relation to Holocene sea-level and environmental changes. Here we focus on trematode pits preserved in the bivalve Chamelea gallina from five late Holocene core samples (2510-3140 y BP) and eight modern death assemblages from the Po-Adriatic system (northern Italy). Using ImageJ, we measured 838 total pits, with 715 from the core samples and 123 from the death assemblages. The geometric mean of the primary and secondary axis was used as a proxy for trace size, which ranges from 0.117 mm to 1.708 mm. The median size of Holocene pits (0.497 mm) is significantly larger (pWilcoxon = 1.73e-05) than the median size of modern pits (0.396 mm), indicating a decrease in trematode metacercariae body size over this time. There was no significant relationship between trematode pit size and host bivalve body size and only whole, well-preserved Holocene valves were analyzed to minimize the influence of taphonomy. We interpret a change in C. gallina-trematode parasite-host interactions over the last 3 ky, which could be the result of several scenarios. Modern pits could be created by different taxa, which have smaller body sizes, or the pits could be formed by the same parasitic taxa which now may have a decreased body size, perhaps due to stress. These results, coupled with a survey of modern metacercariae sizes, suggest that the trematode pit size record can provide relevant information on parasite paleoecology and, perhaps, identity. Such information will enable more nuanced analyses of parasite-host response to environmental change in the past with an eye to the future.","PeriodicalId":106523,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58782/flmnh.gvjd1610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gymnophallid trematodes are complex life cycle parasites that induce characteristic pits in their bivalve intermediate hosts, which serve as their sole fossil record. Previous work demonstrated that trematode prevalence increases with rising sea levels, but little has been done to investigate patterns of trematode pit size in relation to Holocene sea-level and environmental changes. Here we focus on trematode pits preserved in the bivalve Chamelea gallina from five late Holocene core samples (2510-3140 y BP) and eight modern death assemblages from the Po-Adriatic system (northern Italy). Using ImageJ, we measured 838 total pits, with 715 from the core samples and 123 from the death assemblages. The geometric mean of the primary and secondary axis was used as a proxy for trace size, which ranges from 0.117 mm to 1.708 mm. The median size of Holocene pits (0.497 mm) is significantly larger (pWilcoxon = 1.73e-05) than the median size of modern pits (0.396 mm), indicating a decrease in trematode metacercariae body size over this time. There was no significant relationship between trematode pit size and host bivalve body size and only whole, well-preserved Holocene valves were analyzed to minimize the influence of taphonomy. We interpret a change in C. gallina-trematode parasite-host interactions over the last 3 ky, which could be the result of several scenarios. Modern pits could be created by different taxa, which have smaller body sizes, or the pits could be formed by the same parasitic taxa which now may have a decreased body size, perhaps due to stress. These results, coupled with a survey of modern metacercariae sizes, suggest that the trematode pit size record can provide relevant information on parasite paleoecology and, perhaps, identity. Such information will enable more nuanced analyses of parasite-host response to environmental change in the past with an eye to the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利亚得里亚海变色龙吸虫坑大小的古生态学意义
裸子吸虫是一种复杂的生命周期寄生虫,它们在双壳类中间寄主体内诱导出特有的凹坑,这是它们唯一的化石记录。先前的研究表明,吸虫的流行率随着海平面的上升而增加,但很少有人研究吸虫坑大小与全新世海平面和环境变化的关系。本文重点研究了5个全新世晚期(2510-3140 y BP)双壳变色龙(Chamelea gallina)岩心样本中保存的吸虫坑和8个来自意大利北部亚得里亚海盆地的现代死亡组合。使用ImageJ,我们总共测量了838个坑,其中715个来自岩心样本,123个来自死亡组合。用主、次轴的几何平均值作为迹线尺寸的代表,其范围为0.117 mm ~ 1.708 mm。全新世坑的中位数尺寸(0.497 mm)显著大于现代坑的中位数尺寸(0.396 mm) (pWilcoxon = 1.73e-05),表明吸虫囊蚴体尺寸在此期间减小。吸虫穴大小与寄主双壳体大小之间没有显著的关系,为了尽量减少埋藏的影响,只分析了完整的、保存完好的全新世双壳体。在过去的3天里,我们解释了鸡螺旋体-吸虫寄生虫-宿主相互作用的变化,这可能是几种情况的结果。现代的坑可能是由体型较小的不同分类群形成的,也可能是由同样的寄生分类群形成的,这些分类群现在可能由于压力而体型变小了。这些结果,加上对现代囊蚴大小的调查,表明吸虫坑大小记录可以提供寄生虫古生态学的相关信息,甚至可能提供身份信息。这些信息将使我们能够更细致地分析寄生物-宿主对过去环境变化的反应,并着眼于未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Body Size Estimation in Toads (Anura: Bufonidae): Applicability to the Fossil Record Human-Driven Diversity Changes in Caribbean Parrots Across the Holocene Coyotes Reveal Baseline Nitrogen Decline Across End-Pleistocene Ecosystem Collapse Integrating Paleo, Historical, Archeological, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Data into Caribbean Coral Reef Management Monitors with Memories: Death Assemblages Record a Century of Wastewater Pollution and Remediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1