We see what we want to see: Pitfalls of Perception and Decision-making in Security Management

Helvi Salminen
{"title":"We see what we want to see: Pitfalls of Perception and Decision-making in Security Management","authors":"Helvi Salminen","doi":"10.34190/eccws.22.1.1451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We human beings are often convinced of having a clear picture of reality and believe ourselves to be thoroughly rational in our thinking and decision-making. However, our perception of reality is limited and prone to errors, and our decision-making is often guided by emotions and instincts instead of facts and rational thinking. If we don’t stop to think we often jump to conclusions based on partial or erroneous information, and eloquently justify our decisions with apparently rational arguments. In many areas of human activities, including security management, limits of perception and errors in decision-making can have harmful, even disastrous consequences. Very often in security management the decision-making process is not sufficiently challenged by critical thinking as decisions are often made hidden behind the veil of secrets. Cognitive biases - systematic errors in thinking affecting decisions and judgments - have been identified and analysed in various contexts, and the results have been applied to improve decision-making processes. However, in the heavily regulated and compliance-dominated world of security management sufficient attention hasn’t been paid to cognitive biases and their impacts. As result of insufficient attention an important risk factor is regularly underestimated. This paper includes an introduction to the concept of cognitive biases and the research on the phenomenon. The biases which in the author’s experience have a particularly harmful impact on security management are described in detail. This introduction is followed by description of scenarios and real-life examples where erroneous perception and decision-making of security actors leads to disasters. De-biasing is the strategy which aims at eliminating or at least limiting of the impact of cognitive biases. This strategy has been successfully implemented in various types of environments. This paper presents ideas how de-biasing strategies could be implemented in security management in order to improve the quality of decision-making.","PeriodicalId":258360,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/eccws.22.1.1451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We human beings are often convinced of having a clear picture of reality and believe ourselves to be thoroughly rational in our thinking and decision-making. However, our perception of reality is limited and prone to errors, and our decision-making is often guided by emotions and instincts instead of facts and rational thinking. If we don’t stop to think we often jump to conclusions based on partial or erroneous information, and eloquently justify our decisions with apparently rational arguments. In many areas of human activities, including security management, limits of perception and errors in decision-making can have harmful, even disastrous consequences. Very often in security management the decision-making process is not sufficiently challenged by critical thinking as decisions are often made hidden behind the veil of secrets. Cognitive biases - systematic errors in thinking affecting decisions and judgments - have been identified and analysed in various contexts, and the results have been applied to improve decision-making processes. However, in the heavily regulated and compliance-dominated world of security management sufficient attention hasn’t been paid to cognitive biases and their impacts. As result of insufficient attention an important risk factor is regularly underestimated. This paper includes an introduction to the concept of cognitive biases and the research on the phenomenon. The biases which in the author’s experience have a particularly harmful impact on security management are described in detail. This introduction is followed by description of scenarios and real-life examples where erroneous perception and decision-making of security actors leads to disasters. De-biasing is the strategy which aims at eliminating or at least limiting of the impact of cognitive biases. This strategy has been successfully implemented in various types of environments. This paper presents ideas how de-biasing strategies could be implemented in security management in order to improve the quality of decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们看到了我们想看到的:安全管理中感知和决策的陷阱
我们人类经常相信自己对现实有清晰的认识,并相信自己在思考和决策方面是完全理性的。然而,我们对现实的感知是有限的,容易出错,我们的决策往往是由情绪和本能引导的,而不是事实和理性思考。如果我们不停下来思考,我们往往会根据部分或错误的信息得出结论,并用看似理性的论点雄辩地为我们的决定辩护。在人类活动的许多领域,包括安全管理,感知的限制和决策中的错误可能会产生有害的,甚至是灾难性的后果。在安全管理中,决策过程往往没有受到批判性思维的充分挑战,因为决策往往隐藏在秘密的面纱后面。认知偏差——影响决策和判断的系统性思维错误——已经在各种情况下被识别和分析,其结果已被应用于改进决策过程。然而,在严格监管和遵从性主导的安全管理领域,认知偏差及其影响并没有得到足够的重视。由于注意不足,一个重要的危险因素经常被低估。本文介绍了认知偏差的概念及其研究现状。在作者的经验中,对安全管理有特别有害影响的偏见进行了详细描述。本介绍之后是对场景和现实生活中的示例的描述,其中安全参与者的错误感知和决策导致了灾难。去偏见是一种旨在消除或至少限制认知偏见影响的策略。该策略已在各种类型的环境中成功实现。本文提出了如何在安全管理中实施去偏策略以提高决策质量的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Provoking Emotions to fake Images: The Recurring Signs of fake news and Phishing Scams Spreading on Social Media in Hungary, Romania and Slovakia A Commentary and Exploration of Maritime Applications of Biosecurity and Cybersecurity Intersections Cultural Influences on Information Security Processing Model and Classification of Cybercognitive Attacks: Based on Cognitive Psychology Role of Techno-Economic Coalitions in Future Cyberspace Governance: 'Backcasting' as a Method for Strategic Foresight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1