Verification and validation of underwater models

D. W. Gledhill, J. Illgen
{"title":"Verification and validation of underwater models","authors":"D. W. Gledhill, J. Illgen","doi":"10.1109/OCEANS.1997.634413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As computational power increases and the price of software and hardware decrease, the ability to simulate the effects of oceanic currents on the performance of electronic and electroacoustic systems becomes more achievable. While the modeling of underwater effects will always be orders of magnitude more complex than atmospheric modeling, the increase in technology is causing more underwater models and simulations (M&S) to appear in the literature and on the shelf. As a result, the issue of the \"credibility\" of these models is taking on new meaning. As these models gain more use, they must undergo the verification and validation (V&V) process(es) specified by DoD. This paper presents a standard methodology for V&Ving undersea models that will document their credibility and provide the data needed for accreditation. The methodology is divided into different phases: each with a prescribed input and output, and each with documented results. ISTI has developed a methodology that has been adopted and successfully implemented by a number of different V&V programs. This methodology employs a unique use of Computer Assisted Software Engineering (CASE) tools to reverse engineer source code and produce analytical outputs (flow charts and tables) that aid the engineer/analyst in the V&V process. We have found that the use of CASE tools saves time, which equates to improvements in schedule, cost, and provides the subject matter expert far superior information to evaluate the model and/or simulation. This paper will describe the ISTI-developed methodology and how CASE tools are used in its support. Case studies will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":259593,"journal":{"name":"Oceans '97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oceans '97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1997.634413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As computational power increases and the price of software and hardware decrease, the ability to simulate the effects of oceanic currents on the performance of electronic and electroacoustic systems becomes more achievable. While the modeling of underwater effects will always be orders of magnitude more complex than atmospheric modeling, the increase in technology is causing more underwater models and simulations (M&S) to appear in the literature and on the shelf. As a result, the issue of the "credibility" of these models is taking on new meaning. As these models gain more use, they must undergo the verification and validation (V&V) process(es) specified by DoD. This paper presents a standard methodology for V&Ving undersea models that will document their credibility and provide the data needed for accreditation. The methodology is divided into different phases: each with a prescribed input and output, and each with documented results. ISTI has developed a methodology that has been adopted and successfully implemented by a number of different V&V programs. This methodology employs a unique use of Computer Assisted Software Engineering (CASE) tools to reverse engineer source code and produce analytical outputs (flow charts and tables) that aid the engineer/analyst in the V&V process. We have found that the use of CASE tools saves time, which equates to improvements in schedule, cost, and provides the subject matter expert far superior information to evaluate the model and/or simulation. This paper will describe the ISTI-developed methodology and how CASE tools are used in its support. Case studies will be discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水下模型的验证与验证
随着计算能力的提高和软件和硬件价格的下降,模拟洋流对电子和电声系统性能影响的能力变得更容易实现。虽然水下效应的建模总是比大气建模复杂几个数量级,但技术的进步正在导致更多的水下模型和模拟(M&S)出现在文献中和架子上。因此,这些模型的“可信度”问题被赋予了新的含义。随着这些模型获得更多的使用,它们必须经过DoD指定的验证和确认(V&V)过程。本文提出了V&Ving海底模型的标准方法,该方法将记录其可信度并提供认证所需的数据。该方法分为不同的阶段:每个阶段都有规定的输入和输出,每个阶段都有记录的结果。ISTI开发了一种方法,已被许多不同的V&V项目采用并成功实施。这种方法采用了计算机辅助软件工程(CASE)工具的独特用途,对源代码进行逆向工程,并产生分析输出(流程图和表格),从而在V&V过程中帮助工程师/分析师。我们已经发现使用CASE工具节省了时间,这等同于在进度、成本方面的改进,并且为主题专家提供了评估模型和/或模拟的远为优越的信息。本文将描述sti开发的方法,以及如何使用CASE工具来支持它。将讨论案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nondestructive testing of wooden vessels Volume reverberation and target echo calculations using normal modes REMUS: a small, low cost AUV; system description, field trials and performance results Development of the autonomous surface craft "ACES" The use of ROVS for subsea cable maintenance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1