Formation Evaluation Using NMR, Mud Gas, and Triple-Combo Data – A Norwegian Logging-While-Drilling Case History

H. Thern, A. Kotwicki, N. Ritzmann, J. Petersen, O. Mohnke
{"title":"Formation Evaluation Using NMR, Mud Gas, and Triple-Combo Data – A Norwegian Logging-While-Drilling Case History","authors":"H. Thern, A. Kotwicki, N. Ritzmann, J. Petersen, O. Mohnke","doi":"10.30632/pjv63n3-2022a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of gas in hydrocarbon reservoirs has a distinct effect on commonly used porosity logging measurements such as density, neutron, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Although the effect of gas on NMR measurements is well understood, it remains difficult to estimate true formation porosity and hydrocarbon (HC) saturation exclusively from NMR data in gas-bearing formations. The hydrogen index (HI) of gas is much smaller than one and causes an underestimation of the measured NMR porosity. Unless temperature, pressure, HC composition, and saturation in the volume sensed by NMR are known accurately, compensating for the effect of gas is not easily accomplished. This paper compares different approaches for NMR gas zone analysis, and it introduces a new method integrating NMR logging data with a HI curve derived from mud gas surface logging. The results are connected to a full and consistent petrophysical reservoir description. Data and results from two wells drilled in a North Sea clastic reservoir are presented. The reservoir is dominated by thick units of sandstone, deposited in a submarine turbidite fan, with high porosity and high permeability. The wells were logged with triple-combo (i.e., gamma ray, density, neutron, and resistivity), NMR, and formation tester (FT) tools while drilling across gas, oil, and water intervals. Basic mud gas data are available from surface logging. Uncorrected NMR porosity shows an average porosity underestimation of 6 p.u. in the gas zone compared to triple-combo computer-processed interpretation (CPI) processing. The standalone evaluation of NMR data by a T2 cutoff approach and dual wait-time (DTW) data processing reduces the average porosity mismatch but results in zones of under- and overcorrection of the gas effect. Combining NMR DTW data with density improves the results and reduces the average porosity mismatch to less than 2 p.u. Compositional information from the mud gas data validates an inferred trend of fluid property variation in gas and oil zones across the reservoir and is used to derive a continuous HI log for further improving porosity and gas saturation estimation. Complementary to the results of the integrated data evaluation, we show independent results from mud gas data evaluation using a recently implemented method that provides independent porosity, permeability, and saturation indexes. Adverse conditions for the different approaches, including invasion, variations in mineralogy, and the limited vertical resolution of mud gas data, are discussed. Finally, the benefits and potential of combining NMR, mud gas, and triple-combo data are summarized.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv63n3-2022a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of gas in hydrocarbon reservoirs has a distinct effect on commonly used porosity logging measurements such as density, neutron, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Although the effect of gas on NMR measurements is well understood, it remains difficult to estimate true formation porosity and hydrocarbon (HC) saturation exclusively from NMR data in gas-bearing formations. The hydrogen index (HI) of gas is much smaller than one and causes an underestimation of the measured NMR porosity. Unless temperature, pressure, HC composition, and saturation in the volume sensed by NMR are known accurately, compensating for the effect of gas is not easily accomplished. This paper compares different approaches for NMR gas zone analysis, and it introduces a new method integrating NMR logging data with a HI curve derived from mud gas surface logging. The results are connected to a full and consistent petrophysical reservoir description. Data and results from two wells drilled in a North Sea clastic reservoir are presented. The reservoir is dominated by thick units of sandstone, deposited in a submarine turbidite fan, with high porosity and high permeability. The wells were logged with triple-combo (i.e., gamma ray, density, neutron, and resistivity), NMR, and formation tester (FT) tools while drilling across gas, oil, and water intervals. Basic mud gas data are available from surface logging. Uncorrected NMR porosity shows an average porosity underestimation of 6 p.u. in the gas zone compared to triple-combo computer-processed interpretation (CPI) processing. The standalone evaluation of NMR data by a T2 cutoff approach and dual wait-time (DTW) data processing reduces the average porosity mismatch but results in zones of under- and overcorrection of the gas effect. Combining NMR DTW data with density improves the results and reduces the average porosity mismatch to less than 2 p.u. Compositional information from the mud gas data validates an inferred trend of fluid property variation in gas and oil zones across the reservoir and is used to derive a continuous HI log for further improving porosity and gas saturation estimation. Complementary to the results of the integrated data evaluation, we show independent results from mud gas data evaluation using a recently implemented method that provides independent porosity, permeability, and saturation indexes. Adverse conditions for the different approaches, including invasion, variations in mineralogy, and the limited vertical resolution of mud gas data, are discussed. Finally, the benefits and potential of combining NMR, mud gas, and triple-combo data are summarized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用核磁共振、泥浆气和三重组合数据进行地层评价——挪威随钻测井历史案例
油气储层中天然气的存在对常用的孔隙度测井测量(如密度、中子和核磁共振)有明显的影响。虽然气体对核磁共振测量的影响已经被很好地理解,但仅从含气地层的核磁共振数据来估计真实的地层孔隙度和碳氢化合物饱和度仍然很困难。气体的氢指数(HI)远小于1,导致测量的核磁共振孔隙度低估。除非温度、压力、HC组成和核磁共振测得的体积饱和度是准确的,否则补偿气体的影响是不容易完成的。本文比较了几种核磁共振气层分析方法,介绍了一种将核磁共振测井资料与泥气地面测井所得HI曲线相结合的新方法。这些结果与完整一致的岩石物性油藏描述相关联。本文介绍了在北海碎屑储层中钻探的两口井的数据和结果。储层以厚层砂岩为主,沉积于海底浊积扇内,具有高孔隙度、高渗透率的特点。这些井在钻过气、油和水层时,使用了三重组合(即伽马射线、密度、中子和电阻率)、核磁共振和地层测试(FT)工具进行测井。地面测井可获得基本的泥浆气数据。未经校正的核磁共振孔隙度显示,与三重组合计算机处理解释(CPI)处理相比,含气区的平均孔隙度低估了6 p.u.。通过T2截止方法和双重等待时间(DTW)数据处理对核磁共振数据进行独立评估,减少了平均孔隙度失配,但导致了气体效应校正不足和过度的区域。将核磁共振DTW数据与密度相结合可以改善结果,并将平均孔隙度错配降低到小于2 p.u。来自泥气数据的成分信息验证了整个储层中气层和油层流体性质变化的推断趋势,并用于导出连续的HI测井,以进一步改善孔隙度和含气饱和度的估计。作为综合数据评估结果的补充,我们使用最近实施的方法展示了独立的泥浆气数据评估结果,该方法提供了独立的孔隙度、渗透率和饱和度指标。讨论了不同方法的不利条件,包括侵入、矿物学变化和泥浆气数据的有限垂直分辨率。最后,总结了结合核磁共振、泥气和三重组合数据的优势和潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Geological Facies Analysis in Crust-Mantle Transition Zone Petrophysical Analyses for Supporting the Search for a Claystone-Hosted Nuclear Repository A New R35 and Fractal Joint Rock Typing Method Using MICP Analysis: A Case Study in Middle East Iraq Nuclear Logging in Geological Probing for a Low-Carbon Energy Future – A New Frontier? Underground Hydrogen Storage in Porous Media: The Potential Role of Petrophysics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1