The Jazz Bubble: Neoclassical Jazz in Neoliberal Culture, Dale Chapman

Asher Tobin Chodos
{"title":"The Jazz Bubble: Neoclassical Jazz in Neoliberal Culture, Dale Chapman","authors":"Asher Tobin Chodos","doi":"10.21083/CSIECI.V12I2.4845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For jazz musicians who came of age in the 1990s, Jazz at Lincoln Center (JALC) is a cultural touchstone as contested as the D.A.R.E. program or the Parental Advisory stickers that started appearing on album covers in the mid-1980s. As young jazz musicians grappling with the exacting pedagogy of the JALC organization, many of us sensed that there may have been something ideological behind its rigid dogmas, its conspicuous Brooks Brothers endorsement, its fancy dedicated building in midtown Manhattan, and—above all—its categorical rejection of some of the music we loved best. The polish and superhuman virtuosity of the JALC coterie simultaneously awed us, inspired us, and somehow rubbed us the wrong way. Dale Chapman’s book is a serious and probing attempt to subject that intuition to scholarly scrutiny. It asks, in other words, whether the neotraditionalism that took such hold of the jazz world in the 1990s really was “jazz for the Reagan revolution,” as David Hajdu notoriously characterized it in 2003. Readers already suspicious of the politics of neoclassical jazz will find some corroboration here, but Chapman’s more profound contribution is to remind us that the study of aesthetics can be of real value for the humanities more broadly.","PeriodicalId":277401,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21083/CSIECI.V12I2.4845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

For jazz musicians who came of age in the 1990s, Jazz at Lincoln Center (JALC) is a cultural touchstone as contested as the D.A.R.E. program or the Parental Advisory stickers that started appearing on album covers in the mid-1980s. As young jazz musicians grappling with the exacting pedagogy of the JALC organization, many of us sensed that there may have been something ideological behind its rigid dogmas, its conspicuous Brooks Brothers endorsement, its fancy dedicated building in midtown Manhattan, and—above all—its categorical rejection of some of the music we loved best. The polish and superhuman virtuosity of the JALC coterie simultaneously awed us, inspired us, and somehow rubbed us the wrong way. Dale Chapman’s book is a serious and probing attempt to subject that intuition to scholarly scrutiny. It asks, in other words, whether the neotraditionalism that took such hold of the jazz world in the 1990s really was “jazz for the Reagan revolution,” as David Hajdu notoriously characterized it in 2003. Readers already suspicious of the politics of neoclassical jazz will find some corroboration here, but Chapman’s more profound contribution is to remind us that the study of aesthetics can be of real value for the humanities more broadly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《爵士乐泡沫:新自由主义文化中的新古典爵士乐》,戴尔·查普曼著
对于20世纪90年代成年的爵士音乐家来说,林肯中心的爵士乐(jazz at Lincoln Center,简称JALC)是一种文化试金石,就像D.A.R.E.项目或20世纪80年代中期开始出现在专辑封面上的“家长咨询”(Parental Advisory)贴纸一样备受争议。当年轻的爵士音乐家们努力与jjalc组织严格的教学方法作斗争时,我们中的许多人都感觉到,在它严格的教条背后,在它引人注目的布鲁克斯兄弟(Brooks Brothers)的认可背后,在它位于曼哈顿中城的华丽的专门建筑背后,最重要的是,在它对我们最喜欢的一些音乐的断然拒绝背后,可能有某种意识形态的东西。JALC小圈子的精湛技艺和超人般的精湛技艺同时让我们感到敬畏,给我们带来灵感,但不知怎的,也让我们产生了误解。戴尔·查普曼(Dale Chapman)的书是一次严肃而深入的尝试,试图将这种直觉置于学术审查之下。换句话说,书中提出的问题是,20世纪90年代在爵士乐世界占据如此大地位的新传统主义,是否真的像大卫·哈吉杜(David Hajdu)在2003年臭名昭著地描述的那样,是“里根革命的爵士乐”。已经对新古典爵士乐的政治持怀疑态度的读者会在这里找到一些佐证,但查普曼更深刻的贡献是提醒我们,美学研究可以对更广泛的人文学科具有真正的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Splash Page with Music Reassessing the Role of Subjectivity in Improvised Musical Performance Universal Tonality: The Life and Music of William Parker by Cisco Bradley Sudden Music: Improvisation, Sound, Nature by David Rothenberg Clock in the Living Room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1