Ethical Perceptions of Engineering Faculty Students

Yelubayeva Rakhat, Baikulova Aigerim, Ingaibekova Tolkyn, Makhmetova Aigerim, Bayetov Binazar, B. Matayev, Gulmira Khalikova
{"title":"Ethical Perceptions of Engineering Faculty Students","authors":"Yelubayeva Rakhat, Baikulova Aigerim, Ingaibekova Tolkyn, Makhmetova Aigerim, Bayetov Binazar, B. Matayev, Gulmira Khalikova","doi":"10.3991/ijep.v12i2.29335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to evaluate the professional ethical perception levels of engineering faculty students. The research was carried out with 125 students studying in engineering faculties of various universities in Kazakhstan. In this study, a quantitative research method was adopted, which takes the numerical data as a reference for itself while making associations about the findings and creates the opportunity to evaluate statistical analyses while doing this, while at the same time revealing the similarities and differences in the sample. In the research, a behaviour list consisting of 16 items was used to evaluate the ethical perceptions of engineering faculty students. Frequency (f) and percentage calculations from statistical techniques were used in the analysis of quantitative data. As a result of the research, it has been determined that there is a difference between students’ ethical perceptions about themselves and their colleagues. While the students evaluated the behaviours in the behaviour list from their own perspective, they found it less unethical and also found the behaviours they evaluated in terms of their colleagues more unethical. In this direction, the necessity of reorganising the course curricula with an ethical focus, in-service training of academic staff on ethical leadership, creating a corporate culture for universities to reinforce students’ ethical behaviours and organising seminars to strengthen commitment to ethical values has emerged.","PeriodicalId":170699,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v12i2.29335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the professional ethical perception levels of engineering faculty students. The research was carried out with 125 students studying in engineering faculties of various universities in Kazakhstan. In this study, a quantitative research method was adopted, which takes the numerical data as a reference for itself while making associations about the findings and creates the opportunity to evaluate statistical analyses while doing this, while at the same time revealing the similarities and differences in the sample. In the research, a behaviour list consisting of 16 items was used to evaluate the ethical perceptions of engineering faculty students. Frequency (f) and percentage calculations from statistical techniques were used in the analysis of quantitative data. As a result of the research, it has been determined that there is a difference between students’ ethical perceptions about themselves and their colleagues. While the students evaluated the behaviours in the behaviour list from their own perspective, they found it less unethical and also found the behaviours they evaluated in terms of their colleagues more unethical. In this direction, the necessity of reorganising the course curricula with an ethical focus, in-service training of academic staff on ethical leadership, creating a corporate culture for universities to reinforce students’ ethical behaviours and organising seminars to strengthen commitment to ethical values has emerged.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程学院学生的伦理观念
摘要本研究旨在评估工科学生的职业道德认知水平。这项研究是在哈萨克斯坦各大学工程系学习的125名学生中进行的。在本研究中,采用了定量研究的方法,以数值数据为参考,同时对研究结果进行关联,并在此过程中创造了评估统计分析的机会,同时揭示了样本的异同。本研究采用一份包含16个项目的行为表来评估工程学院学生的道德观念。在定量数据分析中使用了统计技术的频率(f)和百分比计算。研究结果表明,学生对自己和同事的道德观念存在差异。当学生们从自己的角度来评价行为表中的行为时,他们发现它不那么不道德,同时他们也发现他们从同事的角度来评价的行为更不道德。在这个方向上,有必要重组课程,以道德为重点,在职培训学术人员以道德领导,为大学创造企业文化,以加强学生的道德行为,以及举办研讨会,以加强对道德价值观的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mobile Application with Augmented Reality as a Support Tool for Learning Human Anatomy Investigating the Role of Augmented Reality in Supporting Collaborative Learning in Science Education: A Case Study Perception of Engineering Students on Social Constructivist Learning Approach in Classroom Ways of Being Smart in Engineering: Beliefs, Values, and Introductory Engineering Experiences The Impact of Two Proposed Strategies Based on Active Learning on Students' Achievement at the Computer and Their Social Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1