A 12 month smoking cessation outcome-Allen Carr’s Easyway to Stop Smoking-a randomised clinical trial

S. Keogan, Shasha Li, L. Clancy
{"title":"A 12 month smoking cessation outcome-Allen Carr’s Easyway to Stop Smoking-a randomised clinical trial","authors":"S. Keogan, Shasha Li, L. Clancy","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.OA5227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims: Allen Carr’s Easyway to Stop Smoking (AC) is widely used. There are no published randomised clinical trials (RCT) to support its use. Pharmacotherapy and counselling are effective smoking cessation treatments but pharmacotherapy is not used in AC. AC is a behavioural intervention which seems unique. Primary aim: to determine if AC had higher quit rates than Quit.ie service (Quit.ie is an online portal for smoking cessation) at 3months(mos), secondary aims: quit rates at 1,6, and 12mos. and determining associated factors including weight change. Methods: Open, single centre, RCT, 300 smokers recruited, 18yrs plus, a minimum 5 cigarettes daily, matched for age, sex and education, were randomly assigned to AC and Quit.ie. Participants with acute cardiac, respiratory, serious psychiatric illnesses, on-going treatment for alcohol/ illicit drugs were excluded. AC consisted of a 5 hour seminar, in a group setting. Self-reported and CO validated quit rates were analysed at 1,3,6, and 12mos. Results: AC, 151 and Quit.ie, 149 mean age 44 years, outcomes for all 300 were analysed on an Intention to Treat basis.(West et al., 2005) AC had higher quit rates at 1,3,6, and 12mos, AC: 38%(n=57), 27%(n=40), 23%(n=35), 22 %(n=33) vs Quit.ie: 20%(n=30), 15%(n=22), 15%(n=23), 11%(n=17), respectively (all pvalues Conclusions: Allen Carr quit rates were superior to Quit.ie, comparable to established interventions, and deserves further evaluation.","PeriodicalId":212819,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco, smoking control and health education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco, smoking control and health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.OA5227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background/Aims: Allen Carr’s Easyway to Stop Smoking (AC) is widely used. There are no published randomised clinical trials (RCT) to support its use. Pharmacotherapy and counselling are effective smoking cessation treatments but pharmacotherapy is not used in AC. AC is a behavioural intervention which seems unique. Primary aim: to determine if AC had higher quit rates than Quit.ie service (Quit.ie is an online portal for smoking cessation) at 3months(mos), secondary aims: quit rates at 1,6, and 12mos. and determining associated factors including weight change. Methods: Open, single centre, RCT, 300 smokers recruited, 18yrs plus, a minimum 5 cigarettes daily, matched for age, sex and education, were randomly assigned to AC and Quit.ie. Participants with acute cardiac, respiratory, serious psychiatric illnesses, on-going treatment for alcohol/ illicit drugs were excluded. AC consisted of a 5 hour seminar, in a group setting. Self-reported and CO validated quit rates were analysed at 1,3,6, and 12mos. Results: AC, 151 and Quit.ie, 149 mean age 44 years, outcomes for all 300 were analysed on an Intention to Treat basis.(West et al., 2005) AC had higher quit rates at 1,3,6, and 12mos, AC: 38%(n=57), 27%(n=40), 23%(n=35), 22 %(n=33) vs Quit.ie: 20%(n=30), 15%(n=22), 15%(n=23), 11%(n=17), respectively (all pvalues Conclusions: Allen Carr quit rates were superior to Quit.ie, comparable to established interventions, and deserves further evaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项为期12个月的戒烟结果——艾伦·卡尔的简易戒烟方法——一项随机临床试验
背景/目的:Allen Carr的Easyway to Stop Smoking (AC)被广泛使用。没有发表的随机临床试验(RCT)来支持它的使用。药物治疗和咨询是有效的戒烟治疗方法,但药物治疗不用于AC。AC是一种独特的行为干预。主要目的:确定是否有更高的戒烟率比戒烟。退出。这是一个戒烟的在线门户网站)在3个月(大多数),次要目标:戒烟率为1个月,6个月和12个月。确定包括体重变化在内的相关因素。方法:开放、单中心、随机对照试验,招募300名吸烟者,年龄18岁以上,每天至少吸烟5支,年龄、性别和教育程度相匹配,随机分为AC组和Quit.ie组。患有急性心脏病、呼吸系统疾病、严重精神疾病、正在接受酒精/非法药物治疗的参与者被排除在外。AC包括一个5小时的小组研讨会。在1、3、6和12个月时分析自我报告和CO验证的戒烟率。结果:AC、151和Quit。即,平均年龄为44岁的149人,所有300人的结果都以治疗意向为基础进行分析。(West et al., 2005)在1、3、6和12个月时,AC的戒烟率比戒烟者高:38%(n=57), 27%(n=40), 23%(n=35), 22% (n=33)。即:20%(n=30), 15%(n=22), 15%(n=23), 11%(n=17)。(所有p值)结论:Allen Carr戒烟率优于quit。也就是说,与现有的干预措施相当,值得进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 and smoking: Worse outcome from a surveillance analysis 5 years’ experience of the Quitline in Hungary-where do we go next? Most users quit e-cigarettes without succeeding to quit smoking Smoking cessation activity in respiratory outpatient clinics Impact of Cardiovascular Disease on dyspnea and lung function in a population of Tunisian smokers without airflow limitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1