Greece ∙ Revisiting the Public Procurement Directives After the Pandemic

S. Tsevas, K. Hornbanger
{"title":"Greece ∙ Revisiting the Public Procurement Directives After the Pandemic","authors":"S. Tsevas, K. Hornbanger","doi":"10.21552/epppl/2022/4/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which requires a litigant lodging an application for an interlocutory injunction or an action for review to pay flat-rate court fees of an amount impossible to foresee, where the contracting authority has opted for a procedure for the award of a public contract without prior publication of a contract notice or, as the case may be, without subsequent publication of a contract award notice, with the result that it can be impossible for the litigant to ascertain the estimated value of the contract and the number of separately contestable decisions adopted by the contracting authority on the basis of which those fees were calculated. [...]that litigant can be unable to foresee the amount of the flat-rate fees which he or she must pay. 102. […] [...]national legislation which requires a litigant to pay flat-rate court fees of an amount that is impossible to foresee before that person lodges his or her application for an interlocutory injunction or action for review makes it practically impossible or excessively difficult for him or her to exercise his or her right to an effective remedy, and therefore infringes Article 47 of the Charter, including where that amount represents only a tiny fraction of the value of the contract(s) concerned. [...]facing a situation of apparent opacity and no prior publication, the Court decided to directly apply Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, even though the Public Procurement Directives alone regulate review procedures in a more restrictive way. The document draws the attention of awarding authorities to the following points: (a.) the rules allowing for negotiated procedure without prior publication are to be interpreted restrictively, (b.) the burden of proof that extraordinary circumstances occur is borne by the contracting authority, (c.) Member States are prohibited from passing national laws that make more flexible the Directives' requirements for public procurement through negotiated procedures without prior publication, (d.) negotiated procedures without prior publication are permitted only under the conditions prescribed by the Directives, and strictly after providing full and special reasoning for the use of such an awarding procedure, (e.) according to Greek law 4412/2016, the conditions prescribed by the Directives for the use of negotiated procedure without prior publication do apply regardless of contract's value, (f.) European Commission has already launched EU PILOT proceedings against Member States for illegally awarding contracts by use of negotiated procedure without prior publication, (g.) obligations arising from Directive 2014/24 article 50, regarding the notification of contract's conclusion, are still valid, (h.) before using negotiated procedure without prior publication, greek public bodies are obliged to ask for Hellenic Single Public Procurement Authority's agreement.","PeriodicalId":176734,"journal":{"name":"European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2022/4/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which requires a litigant lodging an application for an interlocutory injunction or an action for review to pay flat-rate court fees of an amount impossible to foresee, where the contracting authority has opted for a procedure for the award of a public contract without prior publication of a contract notice or, as the case may be, without subsequent publication of a contract award notice, with the result that it can be impossible for the litigant to ascertain the estimated value of the contract and the number of separately contestable decisions adopted by the contracting authority on the basis of which those fees were calculated. [...]that litigant can be unable to foresee the amount of the flat-rate fees which he or she must pay. 102. […] [...]national legislation which requires a litigant to pay flat-rate court fees of an amount that is impossible to foresee before that person lodges his or her application for an interlocutory injunction or action for review makes it practically impossible or excessively difficult for him or her to exercise his or her right to an effective remedy, and therefore infringes Article 47 of the Charter, including where that amount represents only a tiny fraction of the value of the contract(s) concerned. [...]facing a situation of apparent opacity and no prior publication, the Court decided to directly apply Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, even though the Public Procurement Directives alone regulate review procedures in a more restrictive way. The document draws the attention of awarding authorities to the following points: (a.) the rules allowing for negotiated procedure without prior publication are to be interpreted restrictively, (b.) the burden of proof that extraordinary circumstances occur is borne by the contracting authority, (c.) Member States are prohibited from passing national laws that make more flexible the Directives' requirements for public procurement through negotiated procedures without prior publication, (d.) negotiated procedures without prior publication are permitted only under the conditions prescribed by the Directives, and strictly after providing full and special reasoning for the use of such an awarding procedure, (e.) according to Greek law 4412/2016, the conditions prescribed by the Directives for the use of negotiated procedure without prior publication do apply regardless of contract's value, (f.) European Commission has already launched EU PILOT proceedings against Member States for illegally awarding contracts by use of negotiated procedure without prior publication, (g.) obligations arising from Directive 2014/24 article 50, regarding the notification of contract's conclusion, are still valid, (h.) before using negotiated procedure without prior publication, greek public bodies are obliged to ask for Hellenic Single Public Procurement Authority's agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行病后重新审视公共采购指令
《基本权利宪章》第47条必须被解释为排除国内立法,即在订约当局选择了不事先公布合同通知或不随后公布合同授予通知的程序的情况下,要求诉讼当事人提出中间禁令或复审诉讼以支付无法预见数额的固定费率法庭费用。其结果是,诉讼当事人不可能确定合同的估计价值和订约当局所通过的可单独抗辩的决定的数目,而这些费用是根据这些决定计算的。[…诉讼当事人可能无法预见他或她必须支付的固定费率费用的数额。102. [...] [...[2]要求诉讼当事人支付固定费率的法庭费用的国家立法,其数额在当事人提出临时禁令或复审诉讼申请之前是无法预见的,这使他或她实际上不可能或极其困难地行使他或她获得有效补救的权利,因此违反了《宪章》第四十七条,包括在该数额仅占有关合同价值的一小部分的情况下。[…面对明显不透明和没有事先公布的情况,法院决定直接适用《基本权利宪章》第47条,尽管仅《公共采购指令》就以更严格的方式规范审查程序。该文件提请授奖当局注意以下几点:(a)对允许无须事先公布的谈判程序的规则应作限制性解释;(b)发生特殊情况的举证责任由订约当局承担;(c)(d)只有在指令规定的条件下,并且严格在为使用这种授予程序提供充分和特殊的理由之后,才允许在没有事先公布的情况下通过谈判程序,使指令对公共采购的要求更加灵活的国家法律,(e)根据希腊法律4412/2016。无论合同价值如何,《指令》规定的使用协商程序而不事先公布的条件均适用;欧盟委员会已经启动了欧盟试点程序,针对成员国使用未经事先公布的谈判程序非法授予合同,(例如)指令2014/24第50条关于合同签订通知的义务仍然有效,(h)在使用未经事先公布的谈判程序之前,希腊公共机构有义务要求希腊单一公共采购局同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ukraine ∙ Challenges in Attracting the Private Sector to Infrastructure Recovery in Ukraine The Possibility of Imposing a Fine on Both Parties Due to Unlawful Contract Amendment (Case C-263/19 T-Systems Magyarország) Switzerland ∙ The Revised Swiss Public Procurement Law: More Quality and Sustainability The Opportunity of the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the Adaptation of the Spanish Public Procurement Framework Proving Compliance with the Condition of Economic Dependence in In-House Contracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1