{"title":"Window-Dressing or Window of Opportunity? Assessing the Advancement of Gender Equality in Autocracies","authors":"E. Bjarnegård, D. Donno","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is growing evidence of the international and domestic political benefits for autocrats to advance women’s rights (Bjarnegård and Zetterberg 2016; Bush and Zetterberg 2021; Donno and Kreft 2019; Tripp 2019). Research on the adoption of gender reforms in autocracies—including contributions in this Critical Perspectives section by Audrey L. Comstock and Andrea Vilán (2022) and Aili Mari Tripp (2022)—emphasizes the dual role of international pressure (Donno, Fox, and Kaasik 2021; Edgell 2017; Okundaye and Breuning 2021) and women’s movements (Giersdorf and Croissant 2011; Htun and Weldon 2012; Tripp 2015). Reforms can be “top-down” if the autocrat advances rights even while suppressing the women’s movement, or “bottom-up” if the regime allies with—and seeks to co-opt—civil society groups.","PeriodicalId":203979,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Gender","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x22000496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
There is growing evidence of the international and domestic political benefits for autocrats to advance women’s rights (Bjarnegård and Zetterberg 2016; Bush and Zetterberg 2021; Donno and Kreft 2019; Tripp 2019). Research on the adoption of gender reforms in autocracies—including contributions in this Critical Perspectives section by Audrey L. Comstock and Andrea Vilán (2022) and Aili Mari Tripp (2022)—emphasizes the dual role of international pressure (Donno, Fox, and Kaasik 2021; Edgell 2017; Okundaye and Breuning 2021) and women’s movements (Giersdorf and Croissant 2011; Htun and Weldon 2012; Tripp 2015). Reforms can be “top-down” if the autocrat advances rights even while suppressing the women’s movement, or “bottom-up” if the regime allies with—and seeks to co-opt—civil society groups.
越来越多的证据表明,独裁者推进妇女权利在国际和国内都有政治利益(bjarnegatrd和Zetterberg 2016;布什和泽特伯格2021;Donno and Kreft 2019;特里普2019)。关于专制国家采用性别改革的研究——包括Audrey L. Comstock和Andrea Vilán(2022)以及Aili Mari Tripp(2022)在批判视角部分的贡献——强调了国际压力的双重作用(Donno, Fox, and Kaasik 2021;Edgell 2017;Okundaye and Breuning 2021)和妇女运动(Giersdorf and Croissant 2011;Htun and Weldon 2012;特里普2015)。如果独裁者在压制妇女运动的同时推进权利,那么改革可以是“自上而下”的;如果政权与公民社会团体结盟并寻求拉拢,那么改革可以是“自下而上”的。