{"title":"Black Skin, White Music: Afroporteño Musicians and Composers in Europe in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century","authors":"Norberto Pablo Círio","doi":"10.5406/BLACMUSIRESEJ.35.1.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As nineteenth-century Argentine local elites struggled to transform the country into a \"white republic,\" Afro-descendant populations in Buenos Aires embraced peculiar strategies of social mobility. This entailed grappling with the hegemonic values of society while dismissing, at least publicly, their ancestral cultural practices. In this context, there emerged a particular distinction between two types of Afro-descendants: negro che and negro usted. This division can be understood as a straightforward but radical reshuffling of values and as an instance of adaptation to modern society. However, from the perspective of postcolonial theory, this process also appears as a possible strategy of camouflage and self-representation based on external references. The symbolic appropriation of discourses and practices of progress and power may have indeed allowed the introduction of an element of \"instability in imitation.\" This paper analyzes this strategy in the lives of two afro-portenos (2) artists, Zenon Rolon (1856-1902) and Manuel Posadas (1860-1916), who travelled to Europe (Florence and Brussels, respectively) to improve their musical knowledge. Given the absence of scholarly studies on the lives of these artists and the difficulties of conducting research in multiple archives, sources are basically limited to existing contemporary afroporteno periodicals. For afroportenos, their printed press constituted an invaluable vehicle for the dissemination of news and ideas at a time when the promise of modernity was to place Argentina at the vanguard of all nations. Both Rolon and Posadas appeared often in these publications to account for their experiences in Europe, while their peers critically assessed their work, in both favorable and unfavorable ways. This article is divided into four parts. First, I will describe the sociopolitical context of mid-nineteenth-century Buenos Aires. Next, I will situate afroportenos in such a context, drawing on their hierarchical social stratification. Third, I will place the artists' own narratives in counterpoint to those published by their critics in the same afroporteno periodicals. Last, I will make use of postcolonial theory to analyze afroporteno social stratification as a mimetic strategy that destabilized dominant discourses by introducing a simulacrum of identity aspiring to fulfill an authorized version of Otherness. The underlying hypothesis is that Rolon and Posadas's self-praised success granted both the status of \"artist\" in Eurocentric terms, while their black lineage placed a wedge of instability within the dominant local narrative. If, on the one hand, this narrative advocated the univocal consolidation of whiteness as the essence and marker of Argentine identity, on the other hand, it also bolstered and prided on the great success of the two artists. Buenos Aires in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century In order to understand the social and political context inhabited by Rolon and Posadas, it is important to offer an overview of the country's situation, especially regarding Buenos Aires during the second half of the nineteenth century. This is due to a variety of factors, as the mid-nineteenth century marked a before and after in the development and consolidation of the nation state. The Battle of Caseros (February 3, 1852) ended the rule of Juan Manuel de Rosas and placed its victor, Justo Jose de Urquiza, in charge of leading the Argentine Confederation until 1860. In addition, since the eighteenth century, British economic influence had increased as a result of illegal smuggling in Colonia del Sacramento and, after the May Revolution of 1810, through the lawful commerce of goods manufactured by the expanding Industrial Revolution. The arrival of the railroad favored the export of raw materials (beef, leather, wool, and grains) through the port of Buenos Aires. This process translated into a weakening of Argentina's smaller regional economies (Garavaglia 2007). …","PeriodicalId":354930,"journal":{"name":"Black Music Research Journal","volume":"710 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Music Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/BLACMUSIRESEJ.35.1.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
As nineteenth-century Argentine local elites struggled to transform the country into a "white republic," Afro-descendant populations in Buenos Aires embraced peculiar strategies of social mobility. This entailed grappling with the hegemonic values of society while dismissing, at least publicly, their ancestral cultural practices. In this context, there emerged a particular distinction between two types of Afro-descendants: negro che and negro usted. This division can be understood as a straightforward but radical reshuffling of values and as an instance of adaptation to modern society. However, from the perspective of postcolonial theory, this process also appears as a possible strategy of camouflage and self-representation based on external references. The symbolic appropriation of discourses and practices of progress and power may have indeed allowed the introduction of an element of "instability in imitation." This paper analyzes this strategy in the lives of two afro-portenos (2) artists, Zenon Rolon (1856-1902) and Manuel Posadas (1860-1916), who travelled to Europe (Florence and Brussels, respectively) to improve their musical knowledge. Given the absence of scholarly studies on the lives of these artists and the difficulties of conducting research in multiple archives, sources are basically limited to existing contemporary afroporteno periodicals. For afroportenos, their printed press constituted an invaluable vehicle for the dissemination of news and ideas at a time when the promise of modernity was to place Argentina at the vanguard of all nations. Both Rolon and Posadas appeared often in these publications to account for their experiences in Europe, while their peers critically assessed their work, in both favorable and unfavorable ways. This article is divided into four parts. First, I will describe the sociopolitical context of mid-nineteenth-century Buenos Aires. Next, I will situate afroportenos in such a context, drawing on their hierarchical social stratification. Third, I will place the artists' own narratives in counterpoint to those published by their critics in the same afroporteno periodicals. Last, I will make use of postcolonial theory to analyze afroporteno social stratification as a mimetic strategy that destabilized dominant discourses by introducing a simulacrum of identity aspiring to fulfill an authorized version of Otherness. The underlying hypothesis is that Rolon and Posadas's self-praised success granted both the status of "artist" in Eurocentric terms, while their black lineage placed a wedge of instability within the dominant local narrative. If, on the one hand, this narrative advocated the univocal consolidation of whiteness as the essence and marker of Argentine identity, on the other hand, it also bolstered and prided on the great success of the two artists. Buenos Aires in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century In order to understand the social and political context inhabited by Rolon and Posadas, it is important to offer an overview of the country's situation, especially regarding Buenos Aires during the second half of the nineteenth century. This is due to a variety of factors, as the mid-nineteenth century marked a before and after in the development and consolidation of the nation state. The Battle of Caseros (February 3, 1852) ended the rule of Juan Manuel de Rosas and placed its victor, Justo Jose de Urquiza, in charge of leading the Argentine Confederation until 1860. In addition, since the eighteenth century, British economic influence had increased as a result of illegal smuggling in Colonia del Sacramento and, after the May Revolution of 1810, through the lawful commerce of goods manufactured by the expanding Industrial Revolution. The arrival of the railroad favored the export of raw materials (beef, leather, wool, and grains) through the port of Buenos Aires. This process translated into a weakening of Argentina's smaller regional economies (Garavaglia 2007). …
当19世纪的阿根廷当地精英努力将国家转变为“白人共和国”时,布宜诺斯艾利斯的非洲裔人口采用了独特的社会流动策略。这需要与社会的霸权价值观作斗争,同时至少公开地摒弃他们祖先的文化习俗。在这方面,出现了两种非洲后裔的特别区别:黑人和黑人。这种划分可以理解为价值观的直接而彻底的重新洗牌,也是适应现代社会的一个例子。然而,从后殖民理论的角度来看,这一过程也表现为一种基于外部参考的伪装和自我再现的可能策略。对进步和权力的话语和实践的象征性占有可能确实允许引入“模仿中的不稳定性”元素。本文分析了这一策略在两位非裔艺术家的生活中,泽农·罗伦(1856-1902)和曼努埃尔·波萨达斯(1860-1916),他们前往欧洲(分别是佛罗伦萨和布鲁塞尔)提高他们的音乐知识。鉴于缺乏对这些艺术家生活的学术研究,以及在多个档案中进行研究的困难,来源基本上仅限于现有的当代非洲艺术期刊。对于非洲人来说,他们的印刷品是传播新闻和思想的宝贵工具,当时现代化的承诺使阿根廷成为所有国家的先锋。洛伦和波萨达斯都经常出现在这些出版物中,讲述他们在欧洲的经历,而他们的同行则以有利和不利的方式对他们的工作进行了批判性评价。本文共分为四个部分。首先,我将描述19世纪中期布宜诺斯艾利斯的社会政治背景。接下来,我将把非洲裔美国人置于这样的背景下,利用他们的等级社会分层。第三,我将把艺术家自己的叙述与他们的评论家在同一份非洲艺术期刊上发表的叙述相对立。最后,我将利用后殖民理论来分析非洲社会分层作为一种模仿策略,通过引入一种渴望实现授权版本的他者的身份拟像来破坏主导话语的稳定。潜在的假设是,洛伦和波萨达斯自诩的成功赋予了他们以欧洲为中心的“艺术家”地位,而他们的黑人血统在占主导地位的地方叙事中造成了不稳定。如果说,这种叙事一方面主张将白人作为阿根廷身份的本质和标志加以明确的巩固,另一方面,它也为这两位艺术家的巨大成功提供了支持和自豪。19世纪下半叶的布宜诺斯艾利斯为了理解罗伦和波萨达斯居住的社会和政治背景,重要的是要对该国的情况进行概述,特别是关于19世纪下半叶的布宜诺斯艾利斯。这是由多种因素造成的,正如19世纪中期标志着一个前后在民族国家的发展和巩固。卡塞罗战役(1852年2月3日)结束了胡安·曼努埃尔·德·罗萨斯的统治,并将胜利者乌尔奎萨(Justo Jose de Urquiza)置于领导阿根廷联邦的位置,直到1860年。此外,自18世纪以来,由于萨克拉门托殖民地的非法走私,以及1810年五月革命后,通过不断扩大的工业革命制造的商品的合法贸易,英国的经济影响力有所增加。铁路的到来有利于通过布宜诺斯艾利斯港口出口原材料(牛肉、皮革、羊毛和谷物)。这一过程导致阿根廷较小的区域经济的削弱(Garavaglia 2007)。…