CNN Comparative Study for Apple Quality Classification

Muhammad Syafiq Ibrahim, Shabinar Abdul Hamid, Z. Muhammad, N. A. M. Leh, S. Abdullah, S. J. A. Bakar, M. K. Osman, Solahuddin Yusuf Fadhlullah
{"title":"CNN Comparative Study for Apple Quality Classification","authors":"Muhammad Syafiq Ibrahim, Shabinar Abdul Hamid, Z. Muhammad, N. A. M. Leh, S. Abdullah, S. J. A. Bakar, M. K. Osman, Solahuddin Yusuf Fadhlullah","doi":"10.1109/ICCSCE54767.2022.9935652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reliable and efficient automated fruit grading process is needed to meet the market's increased demand for good quality fruits. Automated systems based on image processing technology are being developed to reduce reliance on manual expertise, which is often time-consuming, expensive, and biased. The propose of this paper is to construct and evaluate different types of CNN models, including conventional CNN, GoogLeNet and AlexNet, for categorising fresh and rotten appearances using a dataset of apple images. All the datasets had performed the operations of pre-processing steps with scaling, rotating, and cropping. All models were trained and tested using the datasets provided by the KAGGLE network. The accuracy and loss performance of all the models are measured. The result shows that the GoogLeNet achieved 100% accuracy, which has better performance compared to the AlexNet and conventional CNN. Hence, the GoogLeNet model has the potential for integration into an automatic fruit grading system.","PeriodicalId":346014,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSCE54767.2022.9935652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A reliable and efficient automated fruit grading process is needed to meet the market's increased demand for good quality fruits. Automated systems based on image processing technology are being developed to reduce reliance on manual expertise, which is often time-consuming, expensive, and biased. The propose of this paper is to construct and evaluate different types of CNN models, including conventional CNN, GoogLeNet and AlexNet, for categorising fresh and rotten appearances using a dataset of apple images. All the datasets had performed the operations of pre-processing steps with scaling, rotating, and cropping. All models were trained and tested using the datasets provided by the KAGGLE network. The accuracy and loss performance of all the models are measured. The result shows that the GoogLeNet achieved 100% accuracy, which has better performance compared to the AlexNet and conventional CNN. Hence, the GoogLeNet model has the potential for integration into an automatic fruit grading system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CNN苹果质量分类的比较研究
为了满足市场对优质水果日益增长的需求,需要一种可靠、高效的自动化水果分级过程。基于图像处理技术的自动化系统正在开发中,以减少对人工专家的依赖,这通常是耗时、昂贵和有偏见的。本文的建议是构建和评估不同类型的CNN模型,包括传统的CNN, GoogLeNet和AlexNet,用于使用苹果图像数据集对新鲜和腐烂的外观进行分类。所有数据集都完成了缩放、旋转、裁剪等预处理步骤的操作。所有模型都使用KAGGLE网络提供的数据集进行训练和测试。对所有模型的精度和损耗性能进行了测试。结果表明,GoogLeNet达到了100%的准确率,与AlexNet和传统CNN相比,具有更好的性能。因此,GoogLeNet模型具有集成到自动水果分级系统的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and Enforcements of Wireless Based Matrix LED Message Moving Display by HD-W60 Microcontroller Multilayer Perceptron Optimization of ECG Peaks for Cardiac Abnormality Detection Domestic Trash Classification with Transfer Learning Using VGG16 Telemetry System for Highland Tomato Plants Using Ubidots Platform Systematic Literature Review of Security Control Assessment Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1