Roosevelt and British Appeasement in 1938

W. Wallace
{"title":"Roosevelt and British Appeasement in 1938","authors":"W. Wallace","doi":"10.1017/S0524500100002084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early in 1938, before those steps had been taken that rendered all but inevitable the European war of late 1939, President Roosevelt suggested to Mr. Chamberlain a form of international conference intended to avert the danger. Mr. Chamberlain rejected it. This, wrote that greatest of all Anglo-Americans, Sir Winston Churchill, ten years later, meant “the loss of the last frail chance to save the world from tyranny otherwise than by war”. Indeed, that the “proffered hand” should thus have been waved away left him “breathless with amazement”. Greater statesman than historian though he was, Churchill's judgement must nonetheless be respected. Yet so must that of a much lesser statesman and historian, Sir Samuel Hoare, later Lord Templewood. Writing after Churchill, this Englishman to the core and arch-defender of Chamberlain put the blame on Roosevelt: “It was, in fact, we who finally agreed to support the proposal, and Roosevelt who decided that the moment was no longer suitable for it”. Not content with this, he went on to assert that “in the months that followed, Anglo-American relations became increasingly intimate and culminated in the parallel efforts that Washington and London made throughout the Czechoslovak crisis”. The odd thing is that the judgements of both men are right, or almost right.","PeriodicalId":159179,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the British Association for American Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1962-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the British Association for American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0524500100002084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early in 1938, before those steps had been taken that rendered all but inevitable the European war of late 1939, President Roosevelt suggested to Mr. Chamberlain a form of international conference intended to avert the danger. Mr. Chamberlain rejected it. This, wrote that greatest of all Anglo-Americans, Sir Winston Churchill, ten years later, meant “the loss of the last frail chance to save the world from tyranny otherwise than by war”. Indeed, that the “proffered hand” should thus have been waved away left him “breathless with amazement”. Greater statesman than historian though he was, Churchill's judgement must nonetheless be respected. Yet so must that of a much lesser statesman and historian, Sir Samuel Hoare, later Lord Templewood. Writing after Churchill, this Englishman to the core and arch-defender of Chamberlain put the blame on Roosevelt: “It was, in fact, we who finally agreed to support the proposal, and Roosevelt who decided that the moment was no longer suitable for it”. Not content with this, he went on to assert that “in the months that followed, Anglo-American relations became increasingly intimate and culminated in the parallel efforts that Washington and London made throughout the Czechoslovak crisis”. The odd thing is that the judgements of both men are right, or almost right.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗斯福和英国1938年的绥靖政策
1938年初,在采取那些使1939年底的欧洲战争几乎不可避免的步骤之前,罗斯福总统向张伯伦先生建议召开一种旨在避免危险的国际会议。张伯伦先生拒绝了。十年后,最伟大的英裔美国人温斯顿·丘吉尔爵士写道,这意味着“失去了通过战争以外的方式将世界从暴政中拯救出来的最后一个微弱机会”。事实上,这只“伸出的手”竟然被挥手离开,这让他“惊讶得喘不过气来”。尽管丘吉尔是比历史学家更伟大的政治家,但他的判断必须得到尊重。然而,一位小得多的政治家和历史学家塞缪尔·霍尔爵士(后来的坦普尔伍德勋爵)也必须如此。这位英国人是张伯伦的铁杆捍卫者,他在丘吉尔之后写了一篇文章,把责任归咎于罗斯福:“事实上,是我们最终同意支持这项提议,而罗斯福认为时机已不适合。”他不满足于此,继续断言“在接下来的几个月里,英美关系变得越来越亲密,并在华盛顿和伦敦在捷克斯洛伐克危机期间的平行努力中达到顶峰”。奇怪的是,两人的判断都是正确的,或者几乎是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Joel Barlow's The Hasty Pudding : A Study in American Neoclassicism The Implementation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title VI and the Use of Federal Funds State Rights and the South 1850–1860 The New Economic History W. R. Brock, An American Crisis: Congress ond Reconstruction, 1865–1867 . (London: Macmillan, 1963), pp. xii, 312.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1