{"title":"Legal Relations: Оccurrence and Regulation","authors":"V. Ershov","doi":"10.37399/2686-9241.2022.1.8-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. This article continues the discussion regarding “actual” legal relations and the regulators of “actual” legal relations. Theoretical Basis. Methods. Scientific knowledge for this article has been established using wellknown researches of the subject made by Russian and foreign authors, and criticisms of outdated provisions based on positivism. The author’s argument is supported by references to the works of not only legal scholars, but also representatives of other sciences (N. Wiener, N. I. Zhukov, L. A. Petrushenko, etc.) The study was conducted from the perspective of an integrative legal understanding. The methodology of general scientific character (formal logic, theory of systems, philosophy) was used, which allowed strengthened conclusions about the nature of “actual” legal relations, both their origin and their development. The use of private scientific methods (formal legal, comparative legal, analysis of national legal acts) allowed determination of the essence of “actual” legal relations, to differentiate legal relations and social. social relations, etc. Results. Two conclusions were reached. Firstly: “actual” legal relations are the objective legal reality, namely existing legal relations, settled first of all by the principles and norms of law contained in a single, developing and multilevel system of forms of national and (or) international law, realised in the state. Secondly: “actual” legal relations – namely the essence of objective legal reality; The regulators of “actual” legal relations are the forms of their expression. Discussion and Conclusion. The regulators of “actual legal relations” are developed as a result of the development of “actual” legal relations, called by Roman lawyers juris vinculum (legal relations related to objective law).","PeriodicalId":184770,"journal":{"name":"Pravosudie / Justice","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravosudie / Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37399/2686-9241.2022.1.8-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Introduction. This article continues the discussion regarding “actual” legal relations and the regulators of “actual” legal relations. Theoretical Basis. Methods. Scientific knowledge for this article has been established using wellknown researches of the subject made by Russian and foreign authors, and criticisms of outdated provisions based on positivism. The author’s argument is supported by references to the works of not only legal scholars, but also representatives of other sciences (N. Wiener, N. I. Zhukov, L. A. Petrushenko, etc.) The study was conducted from the perspective of an integrative legal understanding. The methodology of general scientific character (formal logic, theory of systems, philosophy) was used, which allowed strengthened conclusions about the nature of “actual” legal relations, both their origin and their development. The use of private scientific methods (formal legal, comparative legal, analysis of national legal acts) allowed determination of the essence of “actual” legal relations, to differentiate legal relations and social. social relations, etc. Results. Two conclusions were reached. Firstly: “actual” legal relations are the objective legal reality, namely existing legal relations, settled first of all by the principles and norms of law contained in a single, developing and multilevel system of forms of national and (or) international law, realised in the state. Secondly: “actual” legal relations – namely the essence of objective legal reality; The regulators of “actual” legal relations are the forms of their expression. Discussion and Conclusion. The regulators of “actual legal relations” are developed as a result of the development of “actual” legal relations, called by Roman lawyers juris vinculum (legal relations related to objective law).
介绍。本文继续讨论“实际”法律关系和“实际”法律关系的调节者。理论基础。方法。本文的科学知识是根据俄罗斯和外国作者对该主题的知名研究以及基于实证主义对过时条款的批评而建立的。作者的论点不仅参考了法律学者的著作,而且参考了其他科学的代表(N. Wiener、N. I. Zhukov、L. A. Petrushenko等)的著作。这项研究是从综合法律理解的角度进行的。采用了一般科学性质的方法论(形式逻辑、系统理论、哲学),从而可以对“实际”法律关系的性质,包括它们的起源和发展作出更有力的结论。运用私人科学方法(正式法、比较法、国家法律行为分析),可以确定“实际”法律关系的本质,区分法律关系和社会关系。社会关系等等。结果。得出了两个结论。首先,“实际”法律关系是客观的法律现实,即存在的法律关系,首先由在国家实现的单一、发展和多层次的国内法和(或)国际法形式体系中所包含的法律原则和规范来解决。第二:“实际”法律关系——即客观法律现实的本质;“实际”法律关系的调节者是法律关系的表现形式。讨论与结论。“实际法律关系”的调节器是“实际”法律关系发展的结果,被罗马法学家称为juris vinculum(与客观法有关的法律关系)。