Propuesta metodológica mediante diseños Box-Behnken para mejorar el rendimiento del análisis conjunto en estudios experimentales de mercado

Rubén Huertas-García , Juan Carlos Gázquez-Abad , Francisco J. Martínez-López , Irene Esteban-Millat
{"title":"Propuesta metodológica mediante diseños Box-Behnken para mejorar el rendimiento del análisis conjunto en estudios experimentales de mercado","authors":"Rubén Huertas-García ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Gázquez-Abad ,&nbsp;Francisco J. Martínez-López ,&nbsp;Irene Esteban-Millat","doi":"10.1016/S1138-1442(14)60006-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conjoint analysis is a technique used to study consumer preferences in market research. One of the most important issues is to determine the choice set which respondents must assess; usually factorial designs to estimate part-worth factors have been used. But, if the researcher is also interested in estimating two or more factor interactions, factorial designs require such a large number of alternatives that makes their evaluation very difficult, leading respondents to not use compensatory criteria. Using Box-Behnken designs in blocks reduce the cognitive effort made by respondents and, at the same time, it allows fitting a quadratic model. This paper illustrates, through an experiment, the properties and how to use Box-Behnken designs in market research. Results showed a better performance of these models when compared with standard factorial designs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101110,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espa?ola de Investigación de Marketing ESIC","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 57-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1138-1442(14)60006-1","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espa?ola de Investigación de Marketing ESIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138144214600061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Conjoint analysis is a technique used to study consumer preferences in market research. One of the most important issues is to determine the choice set which respondents must assess; usually factorial designs to estimate part-worth factors have been used. But, if the researcher is also interested in estimating two or more factor interactions, factorial designs require such a large number of alternatives that makes their evaluation very difficult, leading respondents to not use compensatory criteria. Using Box-Behnken designs in blocks reduce the cognitive effort made by respondents and, at the same time, it allows fitting a quadratic model. This paper illustrates, through an experiment, the properties and how to use Box-Behnken designs in market research. Results showed a better performance of these models when compared with standard factorial designs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过Box-Behnken设计提出的方法,以提高联合分析在实验市场研究中的性能
联合分析是一种在市场调查中用来研究消费者偏好的技术。最重要的问题之一是确定受访者必须评估的选择集;通常使用因子设计来估计部分价值因子。但是,如果研究人员也对估计两个或多个因素的相互作用感兴趣,则析因设计需要如此大量的替代方案,这使得其评估非常困难,导致受访者不使用补偿标准。在块中使用Box-Behnken设计减少了受访者的认知努力,同时,它允许拟合二次模型。本文通过实验说明Box-Behnken设计的特性以及如何在市场调研中使用Box-Behnken设计。结果表明,与标准析因设计相比,这些模型的性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
El impacto en los costos de producción de los granos básicos en pequeños y medianos productores en el contexto de la soberanía y seguridad alimentaria de la región oriental de El Salvador Método de las diferencias finitas para la torsión de Saint Venant Determinación de incidencia de ascaris suum en cerdos de traspatio del municipio de Pasaquina departamento de La Unión Propuesta de modelo de gestión por competencias para instituciones de educación superior Discriminación de salarios en el mercado laboral el en El Salvador durante el periodo 2018-2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1