The Cambridge School’s “Guicciardinian Moments” Revisited

John P. McCormick
{"title":"The Cambridge School’s “Guicciardinian Moments” Revisited","authors":"John P. McCormick","doi":"10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691183503.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on the most influential contemporary approach to the study of classical and early-modern republicanism and Niccolò Machiavelli's supposed place within that tradition—the Cambridge School of intellectual history, most prominently represented by J.G.A. Pocock and Quentin Skinner. It argues that these world-renowned intellectual historians obscure important aspects of both republican and Machiavellian political thought; specifically, they largely ignore the fact that ancient and modern republicanisms secure the privileged position of elites more than they facilitate political participation by citizens. They also underplay the fact that Machiavelli's political prescriptions more substantively empower common people and more actively facilitate popular contestation of elites than did most authors and regimes that typify republicanism.","PeriodicalId":117625,"journal":{"name":"Reading Machiavelli","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Machiavelli","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691183503.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the most influential contemporary approach to the study of classical and early-modern republicanism and Niccolò Machiavelli's supposed place within that tradition—the Cambridge School of intellectual history, most prominently represented by J.G.A. Pocock and Quentin Skinner. It argues that these world-renowned intellectual historians obscure important aspects of both republican and Machiavellian political thought; specifically, they largely ignore the fact that ancient and modern republicanisms secure the privileged position of elites more than they facilitate political participation by citizens. They also underplay the fact that Machiavelli's political prescriptions more substantively empower common people and more actively facilitate popular contestation of elites than did most authors and regimes that typify republicanism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剑桥学派的“吉卡迪亚时刻”重访
这一章的重点是研究古典和早期现代共和主义最具影响力的当代方法,以及Niccolò马基雅维利在这一传统中的假定地位——剑桥学派的思想史,最突出的代表是J.G.A.波科克和昆汀·斯金纳。它认为,这些世界知名的知识历史学家掩盖了共和主义和马基雅维利主义政治思想的重要方面;具体来说,他们在很大程度上忽略了一个事实,即古代和现代的共和主义更多地确保了精英的特权地位,而不是促进公民的政治参与。他们也低估了这样一个事实,即马基雅维利的政治处方比大多数代表共和主义的作家和政权更能在实质上赋予普通人权力,更积极地促进精英阶层的流行争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index 3. On the Myth of a Conservative Turn in the Florentine Histories Acknowledgments Introduction. Vulgarity and Virtuosity Summation. Scandalous Writings, Dubious Readings, and the Virtues of Popular Empowerment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1