Securing Agricultural Land Investment Contract: Resolving Salient Agricultural Land Dispute in Indonesia

Antarin Prasanthi Sigit, D. Daryono
{"title":"Securing Agricultural Land Investment Contract: Resolving Salient Agricultural Land Dispute in Indonesia","authors":"Antarin Prasanthi Sigit, D. Daryono","doi":"10.19166/glr.v1i1.2939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2014, Indonesia introduced a more progressive law to ease foreign investment in plantations. This policy seems to resuscitate the legacy of the plantation during colonial times as a source of state revenue. This law however has not signified the increases in plantation companies. One of the major causes has been an inadequate quality of contracts such as lack of transparency, participation, and coherence. In practice, the plantation contract still utilizes the outdated uniform contract based on the 18th century Civil Code adopted from the Dutch Civil Code. These have challenged certainty and enforceability. In line with the liberation of plantations in developing nations, the International Institute for Unification of Private law (UNIDORIT) is drafting the universal guideline for a responsible agricultural land investment contract. The guideline aims at providing the model of a responsible agricultural land investment contract. The model contract considers a broad range of social, political, economic, and cultural aspects to ensure that stakeholders' interests are respected while it also needs to adhere to global issues, such as food security, poverty elevation, and environmental preservation. The article is part of a study attempting to explore the deficiencies of the existing plantation contract and to seek the potential adoption of the UNIDROIT guideline in Indonesia. There are multi-facet challenges to adopt the UNIDROIT guideline as the stakeholders and legal counsel capacity are still limited. Those result in complexity during the agricultural land dispute settlement process in which non-legal factors contribute to its success. This article explores to map the potential issues and to propose a model of more effective agricultural land dispute settlement.","PeriodicalId":344294,"journal":{"name":"Global Legal Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Legal Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v1i1.2939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2014, Indonesia introduced a more progressive law to ease foreign investment in plantations. This policy seems to resuscitate the legacy of the plantation during colonial times as a source of state revenue. This law however has not signified the increases in plantation companies. One of the major causes has been an inadequate quality of contracts such as lack of transparency, participation, and coherence. In practice, the plantation contract still utilizes the outdated uniform contract based on the 18th century Civil Code adopted from the Dutch Civil Code. These have challenged certainty and enforceability. In line with the liberation of plantations in developing nations, the International Institute for Unification of Private law (UNIDORIT) is drafting the universal guideline for a responsible agricultural land investment contract. The guideline aims at providing the model of a responsible agricultural land investment contract. The model contract considers a broad range of social, political, economic, and cultural aspects to ensure that stakeholders' interests are respected while it also needs to adhere to global issues, such as food security, poverty elevation, and environmental preservation. The article is part of a study attempting to explore the deficiencies of the existing plantation contract and to seek the potential adoption of the UNIDROIT guideline in Indonesia. There are multi-facet challenges to adopt the UNIDROIT guideline as the stakeholders and legal counsel capacity are still limited. Those result in complexity during the agricultural land dispute settlement process in which non-legal factors contribute to its success. This article explores to map the potential issues and to propose a model of more effective agricultural land dispute settlement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农地投资契约之保障:印尼农地争议之解决
2014年,印尼出台了一项更为进步的法律,以放宽外国对种植园的投资。这一政策似乎恢复了殖民时期种植园作为国家收入来源的遗产。然而,这项法律并没有表明种植园公司的增加。其中一个主要原因是合同质量不足,如缺乏透明度、参与和一致性。在实践中,种植园合同仍然采用了过时的统一合同,以18世纪民法典为基础,借鉴了荷兰民法典。这些挑战了确定性和可执行性。随着发展中国家种植园的解放,国际私法统一研究所(UNIDORIT)正在起草负责任的农业土地投资合同的普遍准则。该指导意见旨在提供负责任的农地投资合同模式。该示范合同考虑了广泛的社会、政治、经济和文化方面,以确保利益相关者的利益得到尊重,同时也需要坚持全球问题,如粮食安全、消除贫困和环境保护。这篇文章是一项研究的一部分,该研究试图探索现有种植园合同的缺陷,并寻求在印度尼西亚采用统法协准则的可能性。由于利益相关者和法律顾问的能力仍然有限,采用统法协准则面临多方面的挑战。这导致了农地纠纷解决过程的复杂性,其中非法律因素促成了其成功。本文旨在探讨潜在问题,并提出一种更有效的农地纠纷解决模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Analysis of Corporate Crime in Indonesia’s Intellectual Property Laws Borrowing Company Names in the Practice of Procurement of Goods and Services in Indonesia Legal Protection for Consumers of Life Insurance Products During COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia The Impact of the Trade War Between the United States and China on ASEAN and Huawei Technologies as Reviewed by Trade, Investment, and Competition Law Legal Policy of Implementation of Organizing Umrah Worship in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1