Valuing Non-Wage Compensation of Private Sector Labor Union Workers in the Construction Trades

Frank D. Tinari, K. Betz
{"title":"Valuing Non-Wage Compensation of Private Sector Labor Union Workers in the Construction Trades","authors":"Frank D. Tinari, K. Betz","doi":"10.5085/JFE.24.2.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents procedures for calculating the value of non-wage compensation for members of private sector labor unions in the construction industry and cites examples using various collective bargaining agreements. Four major fringe benefit categories are analyzed: welfare, annuity, vacation, and pension funds. When calculating the loss to a private sector union worker it is necessary to obtain not only the relevant collective bargaining agreements but also information regarding both actual earnings and the number of hours worked. If both cannot be obtained, problems in valuing retirement and other fringe benefit funds arise. In some cases, the union member may work for several different employers during any given year, thus receiving many W-2s, but all hours worked would be recorded through the union. To value employer contributions to annuity and vacation funds a determination needs to be made if the contributions take into account premium pay union workers may receive. To value lost medical insurance, the replacement cost of a comparable medical insurance policy should be used. For lost pension benefits, it is important to establish the typical number of hours per annum that would most likely have been worked but for the injury. In addition, if the history of that union's pension benefit reveals increases over time, then that pattern may need to be considered as a basis for determining the future value of the pension benefit. Valuation of each private sector union benefit, therefore, is not simply a matter of referring to the value of the hourly contribution by the employer but requires its own method appropriate to the nature of the benefit as specified in the union's collective bargaining agreement.","PeriodicalId":265321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Economics","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5085/JFE.24.2.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article presents procedures for calculating the value of non-wage compensation for members of private sector labor unions in the construction industry and cites examples using various collective bargaining agreements. Four major fringe benefit categories are analyzed: welfare, annuity, vacation, and pension funds. When calculating the loss to a private sector union worker it is necessary to obtain not only the relevant collective bargaining agreements but also information regarding both actual earnings and the number of hours worked. If both cannot be obtained, problems in valuing retirement and other fringe benefit funds arise. In some cases, the union member may work for several different employers during any given year, thus receiving many W-2s, but all hours worked would be recorded through the union. To value employer contributions to annuity and vacation funds a determination needs to be made if the contributions take into account premium pay union workers may receive. To value lost medical insurance, the replacement cost of a comparable medical insurance policy should be used. For lost pension benefits, it is important to establish the typical number of hours per annum that would most likely have been worked but for the injury. In addition, if the history of that union's pension benefit reveals increases over time, then that pattern may need to be considered as a basis for determining the future value of the pension benefit. Valuation of each private sector union benefit, therefore, is not simply a matter of referring to the value of the hourly contribution by the employer but requires its own method appropriate to the nature of the benefit as specified in the union's collective bargaining agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估建筑业私营部门工会工人的非工资补偿
本文介绍了计算建筑业私营部门工会成员的非工资补偿价值的程序,并引用了使用各种集体谈判协议的例子。附加福利主要分为福利、年金、休假、年金等4种。在计算私营部门工会工人的损失时,不仅需要获得相关的集体谈判协议,还需要获得有关实际收入和工作时间的信息。如果两者都不能获得,就会出现计算退休基金和其他附带福利基金价值的问题。在某些情况下,工会成员可能在任何一年中为几个不同的雇主工作,因此收到许多w -2,但所有的工作时间将通过工会记录。为了评估雇主对年金和假期基金的贡献,需要确定这些贡献是否考虑到工会工人可能收到的溢价工资。要对损失的医疗保险进行估值,应使用可比医疗保险单的重置成本。对于失去的养老金福利,重要的是要确定如果没有受伤,每年最有可能工作的典型小时数。此外,如果该工会的养老金福利的历史显示随着时间的推移而增加,那么可能需要考虑将该模式作为确定养老金福利未来价值的基础。因此,对每一项私营部门工会福利的评估不仅仅是指雇主每小时贡献的价值,而是需要有适合工会集体谈判协议中规定的福利性质的自己的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forecasting Prices for Components of the Medical Cost Index Two-Step Medical Inflation Forecasts: Econometric Performance and Related Issues Worklife Expectancies Two Plus Years after the Start of the Covid-19 Pandemic Corrigendum to “Use of Healthy Life Expectancy to Estimate Future Provision of Household and Personal Services” Estimating Personal Consumption Rates for Husbands and Wives: A Comparison of Income-Strata and Microdata Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1