Decrease Product Rating Uncertainty Through Focused Reviews Solicitation

Nhat X. T. Le, Ryan Rivas, James M. Flegal, Vagelis Hristidis
{"title":"Decrease Product Rating Uncertainty Through Focused Reviews Solicitation","authors":"Nhat X. T. Le, Ryan Rivas, James M. Flegal, Vagelis Hristidis","doi":"10.1142/s1793351x19400208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Customer reviews are an essential resource to reduce an online product’s uncertainty, which has been shown to be a critical factor for its purchase decision. Existing e-commerce platforms typically ask users to write free-form text reviews, which are sometimes augmented by a small set of predefined questions, e.g. “rate the product description’s accuracy from 1 to 5.” In this paper, we argue that this “passive” style of review solicitation is suboptimal in achieving low-uncertainty “review profiles” for products. Its key drawback is that some product aspects receive a very large number of reviews while other aspects do not have enough reviews to draw confident conclusions. Therefore, we hypothesize that we can achieve lower-uncertainty review profiles by carefully selecting which aspects users are asked to rate. To test this hypothesis, we propose various techniques to dynamically select which aspects to ask users to rate given the current review profile of a product. We use Bayesian inference principles to define reasonable review profile uncertainty measures; specifically, via an aspect’s rating variance. We compare our proposed aspect selection techniques to several baselines on several review profile uncertainty measures. Experimental results on two real-world datasets show that our methods lead to better review profile uncertainty compared to aspect selection baselines and traditional passive review solicitations. Moreover, we present and evaluate a hybrid solicitation method that combines the advantages of both active and passive review solicitations.","PeriodicalId":217956,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Semantic Comput.","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Semantic Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793351x19400208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Customer reviews are an essential resource to reduce an online product’s uncertainty, which has been shown to be a critical factor for its purchase decision. Existing e-commerce platforms typically ask users to write free-form text reviews, which are sometimes augmented by a small set of predefined questions, e.g. “rate the product description’s accuracy from 1 to 5.” In this paper, we argue that this “passive” style of review solicitation is suboptimal in achieving low-uncertainty “review profiles” for products. Its key drawback is that some product aspects receive a very large number of reviews while other aspects do not have enough reviews to draw confident conclusions. Therefore, we hypothesize that we can achieve lower-uncertainty review profiles by carefully selecting which aspects users are asked to rate. To test this hypothesis, we propose various techniques to dynamically select which aspects to ask users to rate given the current review profile of a product. We use Bayesian inference principles to define reasonable review profile uncertainty measures; specifically, via an aspect’s rating variance. We compare our proposed aspect selection techniques to several baselines on several review profile uncertainty measures. Experimental results on two real-world datasets show that our methods lead to better review profile uncertainty compared to aspect selection baselines and traditional passive review solicitations. Moreover, we present and evaluate a hybrid solicitation method that combines the advantages of both active and passive review solicitations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过集中评论征集减少产品评级的不确定性
顾客评论是减少在线产品不确定性的重要资源,这已被证明是其购买决策的关键因素。现有的电子商务平台通常要求用户撰写自由格式的文本评论,有时还会增加一组预定义的问题,例如“将产品描述的准确性从1到5打分”。在本文中,我们认为这种“被动”的评论请求风格在实现产品的低不确定性“评论概要”方面是次优的。它的主要缺点是某些产品方面收到了大量的评论,而其他方面没有足够的评论来得出自信的结论。因此,我们假设我们可以通过仔细选择用户被要求评价的方面来实现低不确定性的审查概要。为了验证这一假设,我们提出了各种技术来动态选择要求用户对给定产品的当前评论配置文件进行评分的方面。利用贝叶斯推理原理定义合理的评审剖面不确定度度量;具体来说,通过一个方面的评级差异。我们将我们提出的方面选择技术与几个审查概要不确定性度量的几个基线进行比较。在两个真实数据集上的实验结果表明,与方面选择基线和传统的被动评论请求相比,我们的方法具有更好的评论轮廓不确定性。此外,我们提出并评估了一种混合征集方法,结合了主动和被动评审征集的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guest Editorial - Special Issue on IEEE AIKE 2022 TemporalDedup: Domain-Independent Deduplication of Redundant and Errant Temporal Data Knowledge Graph-Based Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Business Process Analysis Knowledge Graph-Based Integration of Autonomous Driving Datasets Confidence-Based Cheat Detection Through Constrained Order Inference of Temporal Sequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1