Experimental Comparison of Local and Shared Coin Randomized Consensus Protocols

Henrique Moniz, N. Neves, M. Correia, P. Veríssimo
{"title":"Experimental Comparison of Local and Shared Coin Randomized Consensus Protocols","authors":"Henrique Moniz, N. Neves, M. Correia, P. Veríssimo","doi":"10.1109/SRDS.2006.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a comparative performance study of the two main classes of randomized binary consensus protocols: a local coin protocol, with an expected high communication complexity and cheap symmetric cryptography, and a shared coin protocol, with an expected low communication complexity and expensive asymmetric cryptography. The experimental evaluation was conducted on a LAN environment, by varying several system parameters, such as the fault types and number of processes. The analysis shows that there is a significant gap between the theoretical and the practical performance results of these protocols, and provides an important insight into what actually happens during their execution","PeriodicalId":164765,"journal":{"name":"2006 25th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS'06)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 25th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2006.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative performance study of the two main classes of randomized binary consensus protocols: a local coin protocol, with an expected high communication complexity and cheap symmetric cryptography, and a shared coin protocol, with an expected low communication complexity and expensive asymmetric cryptography. The experimental evaluation was conducted on a LAN environment, by varying several system parameters, such as the fault types and number of processes. The analysis shows that there is a significant gap between the theoretical and the practical performance results of these protocols, and provides an important insight into what actually happens during their execution
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本地和共享币随机共识协议的实验比较
本文对两类主要的随机化二元共识协议进行了性能比较研究:具有高通信复杂度和廉价对称密码的本地币协议和具有低通信复杂度和昂贵非对称密码的共享币协议。实验评估是在局域网环境下进行的,通过改变几个系统参数,如故障类型和进程数量。分析表明,这些协议的理论和实际性能结果之间存在很大差距,并提供了一个重要的见解,了解在执行过程中实际发生了什么
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of a fair fault-tolerant mutual exclusion algorithm Fault-tolerant and scalable TCP splice and web server architecture Improvements and Reconsideration of Distributed Snapshot Protocols Improving DBMS Performance through Diverse Redundancy AVCast : New Approaches For Implementing Availability-Dependent Reliability for Multicast Receivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1