Off the Human Track:

H. Melehy
{"title":"Off the Human Track:","authors":"H. Melehy","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv10kmcfq.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Responding to long-standing criticisms that theoretical readings of early modern literary texts are anachronistic, Melehy argues that past and present phenomena may be understood alongside one another, while still respecting both of them. He brings together Gilles Deleuze and Michel de Montaigne through their shared interest in Lucretius. Melehy demonstrates a Lucretian-inflected materialism in Montaigne’s Essais that implicitly criticizes Platonic conceptions of the primacy of thought over matter, and concomitant human claims to dominate the physical and natural world. Melehy signals intersections between Montaigne’s dissident philosophy and Deleuze’s materialist re-conception of the history of philosophy in order to point out ways that the essayist’s work speaks to questions that are also pertinent to present-day meditations on the environment.","PeriodicalId":180042,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern Écologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern Écologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10kmcfq.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Responding to long-standing criticisms that theoretical readings of early modern literary texts are anachronistic, Melehy argues that past and present phenomena may be understood alongside one another, while still respecting both of them. He brings together Gilles Deleuze and Michel de Montaigne through their shared interest in Lucretius. Melehy demonstrates a Lucretian-inflected materialism in Montaigne’s Essais that implicitly criticizes Platonic conceptions of the primacy of thought over matter, and concomitant human claims to dominate the physical and natural world. Melehy signals intersections between Montaigne’s dissident philosophy and Deleuze’s materialist re-conception of the history of philosophy in order to point out ways that the essayist’s work speaks to questions that are also pertinent to present-day meditations on the environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脱离人的轨道:
对于长期以来对早期现代文学文本的理论解读是不合时宜的批评,Melehy认为过去和现在的现象可以相互理解,同时仍然尊重两者。他将吉尔·德勒兹和米歇尔·德·蒙田通过他们对卢克莱修的共同兴趣联系在一起。梅利希在蒙田的《论文集》中展示了卢克莱安式的唯物主义,含蓄地批评了柏拉图式的思想高于物质的观念,以及随之而来的人类对物质和自然世界的统治主张。Melehy指出了蒙田的异见哲学和德勒兹对哲学史的唯物主义重新概念之间的交叉点,以便指出散文家的作品讲述的问题也与当今对环境的思考有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
10. Reading Olivier de Serres circa 1600: Between Economy and Ecology Index 1. Off the Human Track : Montaigne, Deleuze, and the Materialization of Philosophy Frontmatter 4. Equipment for Living with Hyperobjects : Proverbs in Ronsard’s Franciade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1