THE HYBRID RHETORICAL ETHOS

Samuel Mateus
{"title":"THE HYBRID RHETORICAL ETHOS","authors":"Samuel Mateus","doi":"10.1590/1982-4017-210203-11119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There are three main schools for the study of the ethos: the pragmatic-discursive; the symbolic interactionist, and the rhetorical one. This paper aims to give an encompassing and fuller perspective on the rhetorical ethos that can be useful to the contemporary uses of the persuasive communication, including media communication such as advertising or marketing communication. Primarily, it outlines the conceptual employments ethos has suffered by through different subjects. Subsequently, it briefly enumerates the major rhetorical traditions; lastly, it postulates the rhetoric ethos as a hybrid notion that includes both a projected and an intended dimension. We hope this distinction allows us to better will envisage the persuasive communication further than the forum/agora and its several digital uses in the 21th century.","PeriodicalId":378704,"journal":{"name":"Linguagem em (Dis)curso","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguagem em (Dis)curso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-210203-11119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract There are three main schools for the study of the ethos: the pragmatic-discursive; the symbolic interactionist, and the rhetorical one. This paper aims to give an encompassing and fuller perspective on the rhetorical ethos that can be useful to the contemporary uses of the persuasive communication, including media communication such as advertising or marketing communication. Primarily, it outlines the conceptual employments ethos has suffered by through different subjects. Subsequently, it briefly enumerates the major rhetorical traditions; lastly, it postulates the rhetoric ethos as a hybrid notion that includes both a projected and an intended dimension. We hope this distinction allows us to better will envisage the persuasive communication further than the forum/agora and its several digital uses in the 21th century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合修辞精神
关于民族精神的研究主要有三种流派:语用论;象征互动主义者和修辞互动主义者。本文的目的是给出一个全面和更全面的观点,修辞精神,可以帮助有说服力的沟通,包括媒体传播,如广告或营销传播的当代使用。首先,它概述了概念就业精神已经通过不同的学科遭受。随后,简要列举了主要的修辞传统;最后,它将修辞精神假设为一种混合概念,包括预期维度和预期维度。我们希望这种区别能让我们更好地设想有说服力的沟通,而不是论坛/集市及其在21世纪的几种数字用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LÍNGUA, MATERIALIDADE DISCURSIVA E COSMOGONIA ESCOLHAS LINGUÍSTICAS E VALORES CULTURAIS NA CONSTRUÇÃO INTERACIONAL DE PEDIDOS DE BRASILEIROS E ITALIANOS POLITENESS, RELEVANCE, AND GOAL-CONCILIATION: AN ANALYSIS OF “CAN YOU PASS THE SALT?” ESTUDOS PRAGMÁTICOS CONTEMPORÂNEOS: DESENVOLVIMENTOS NO SUL DO BRASIL TEORIA DA RELEVÂNCIA E TEORIA DA LITERATURA: AS TEORIAS CIENTÍFICAS E AS TEORIAS CRÍTICAS DEVEM SER (RE)CONCILIADAS?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1