Determination of Predictors of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Revascularized with the Two-Stent Strategy

A. Demir, Gokhan Demirci, S. Aslan, B. Uygur, Y. Avcı, A. Kalkan, M. Ertürk
{"title":"Determination of Predictors of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Revascularized with the Two-Stent Strategy","authors":"A. Demir, Gokhan Demirci, S. Aslan, B. Uygur, Y. Avcı, A. Kalkan, M. Ertürk","doi":"10.51645/KHJ.2021.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important complication that increases mortality, morbidity, hospitalization and costs after the invasive cardiac procedures. The incidence of AKI and the factors affecting the development of AKI after the revascularization of coronary bifurcation lesions with the two-stent strategy remain unclear. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 230 consecutive non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients who underwent revascularization with the two-stent strategy for the true coronary artery bifurcation lesions between January 2015 and September 2020, and did not meet the exclusion criteria. AKI was defined as meeting Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) group criteria with the development of creatinine changes within the first 48 hours after the procedure. ACEF (age, serum creatinine, left ventricular ejection fraction) score was calculated for all patients. Results: AKI developed in 28 (12.2%) patients after the procedure. As a result of the multivariable analysis, hypertension, ACEF score ≥ 1.14 and contrast agent volume ≥ 252 mL were determined as independent predictors for AKI. The coronary anatomical factors and technique related factors had no effect on AKI development. ACEF score ≥ 1.14 had sensitivity of 82.1%, specificity of 60.9% and negative predictive value of 96.1% for detecting AKI development. Moreover, the rate of AKI in the group with high ACEF score was significantly higher than the group with low ACEF score (22.5% vs. 3.9%, p< 0.001). Conclusion: The simple and extremely user-friendly ACEF score can accurately describe the risk of AKI development after the revascularization of coronary bifurcation lesions with the two-stent strategy.","PeriodicalId":239985,"journal":{"name":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51645/KHJ.2021.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important complication that increases mortality, morbidity, hospitalization and costs after the invasive cardiac procedures. The incidence of AKI and the factors affecting the development of AKI after the revascularization of coronary bifurcation lesions with the two-stent strategy remain unclear. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 230 consecutive non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients who underwent revascularization with the two-stent strategy for the true coronary artery bifurcation lesions between January 2015 and September 2020, and did not meet the exclusion criteria. AKI was defined as meeting Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) group criteria with the development of creatinine changes within the first 48 hours after the procedure. ACEF (age, serum creatinine, left ventricular ejection fraction) score was calculated for all patients. Results: AKI developed in 28 (12.2%) patients after the procedure. As a result of the multivariable analysis, hypertension, ACEF score ≥ 1.14 and contrast agent volume ≥ 252 mL were determined as independent predictors for AKI. The coronary anatomical factors and technique related factors had no effect on AKI development. ACEF score ≥ 1.14 had sensitivity of 82.1%, specificity of 60.9% and negative predictive value of 96.1% for detecting AKI development. Moreover, the rate of AKI in the group with high ACEF score was significantly higher than the group with low ACEF score (22.5% vs. 3.9%, p< 0.001). Conclusion: The simple and extremely user-friendly ACEF score can accurately describe the risk of AKI development after the revascularization of coronary bifurcation lesions with the two-stent strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉分叉病变双支架重建患者急性肾损伤预测因素的测定
急性肾损伤(AKI)是有创心脏手术后死亡率、发病率、住院率和费用增加的重要并发症。冠状动脉分叉病变双支架重建术后AKI的发生率及影响AKI发展的因素尚不清楚。患者和方法:我们回顾性评估了230例连续非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者,这些患者在2015年1月至2020年9月期间接受了双支架策略的真冠状动脉分叉病变的血运重建术,不符合排除标准。AKI定义为符合急性肾损伤网络(AKIN)组标准,并在手术后48小时内出现肌酐变化。计算所有患者的ACEF(年龄、血清肌酐、左心室射血分数)评分。结果:28例(12.2%)患者术后发生AKI。通过多变量分析,高血压、ACEF评分≥1.14和造影剂体积≥252 mL被确定为AKI的独立预测因素。冠状动脉解剖因素和技术相关因素对AKI的发展无影响。ACEF评分≥1.14时检测AKI的敏感性为82.1%,特异性为60.9%,阴性预测值为96.1%。ACEF评分高组AKI发生率显著高于ACEF评分低组(22.5% vs. 3.9%, p< 0.001)。结论:简单易用的ACEF评分能准确描述冠脉分叉病变双支架重建术后AKI发生的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive Value of Post-operative Cardiac Troponin I and Lactate Levels After Ventricular Septal Defect Closure Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Following TEVAR with or without Revascularization of the Left Subclavian Artery Distal Versus Proximal Radial Intervention; Is It Really Worth of It? What Did the Latest Updated Pulmonary Hypertension Guide Bring? Current Position and Future Perspectives of Melatonin and Its Supplements in Pulmonary Hypertension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1