Some Elements About the Classical Employment Theory and the Keynesian Perspective

Primera Argoti, George Samuleson
{"title":"Some Elements About the Classical Employment Theory and the Keynesian Perspective","authors":"Primera Argoti, George Samuleson","doi":"10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i2.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental aim of this paper is to lay out essential elements concerning classical economic theory about employment, and compare them with the Keynesian approach. In other words, this document shows a comparative-contrasting study of the classical and more modern theoretical claims, concerning employment. Since employment is a crucial variable related to economic growth and development, this paper is focused on a revision of conceptual issues concerning such a critical indicator. The approach presented here is important not only for professional economists but also for other social scientists. One of the major conclusions of this study is referred to the evidence that the Keynesian “General Theory” is not precisely the most completed and updated theoretical approach to solve problems of employment, but it has a particular richness in its contents that is important to rescue; in fact that theory was extremely useful to undertake unemployment and economic growth problems during the Great Recession in the United States.","PeriodicalId":142050,"journal":{"name":"ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i2.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fundamental aim of this paper is to lay out essential elements concerning classical economic theory about employment, and compare them with the Keynesian approach. In other words, this document shows a comparative-contrasting study of the classical and more modern theoretical claims, concerning employment. Since employment is a crucial variable related to economic growth and development, this paper is focused on a revision of conceptual issues concerning such a critical indicator. The approach presented here is important not only for professional economists but also for other social scientists. One of the major conclusions of this study is referred to the evidence that the Keynesian “General Theory” is not precisely the most completed and updated theoretical approach to solve problems of employment, but it has a particular richness in its contents that is important to rescue; in fact that theory was extremely useful to undertake unemployment and economic growth problems during the Great Recession in the United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古典就业理论的若干要素与凯恩斯主义视角
本文的基本目的是阐述经典经济就业理论的基本要素,并将其与凯恩斯方法进行比较。换句话说,这份文件展示了一个关于就业的古典和现代理论主张的比较对比研究。由于就业是与经济增长和发展有关的一个关键变量,本文的重点是修订有关这一关键指标的概念问题。这里提出的方法不仅对专业经济学家很重要,对其他社会科学家也很重要。本研究的一个主要结论是,有证据表明,凯恩斯主义的“通论”并不是解决就业问题最完整和最新的理论方法,但它的内容特别丰富,对拯救就业问题很重要;事实上,这一理论对于研究美国大衰退期间的失业和经济增长问题极为有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Bride Wealth of the Ambai Serui Tribe Marriage: A Christian Faith View Hidayatullah.com and Liputanislam.com Editorial Policies in Middle East Conflict Reporting The Right Man in the Right Job: Evaluation of Employee Placement Policy in South Tangerang City Improving Public Services in Realizing Good Governance in Indonesia Analysis of Bandung City Muzaki Satisfaction with the Services of the National Amil Zakat Agency (BAZNAS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1