Retaining U.S. stem women faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic: the important role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors to lower work-to-life conflict

K. Lawson, Soomi Lee, Claire E. Smith, Kelsey C. Thiem
{"title":"Retaining U.S. stem women faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic: the important role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors to lower work-to-life conflict","authors":"K. Lawson, Soomi Lee, Claire E. Smith, Kelsey C. Thiem","doi":"10.1108/gm-10-2022-0326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe COVID-19 pandemic may negatively impact the careers of U.S. women faculty in computer science (CS) – a field with few women and high attrition rates among women – due to difficulties balancing increased work and family demands (author citation). Thus, it is important to understand whether supervisors may help to decrease this work-to-life conflict and increase the odds of retaining women faculty. This study examined whether family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB) were associated with better retention-related job outcomes (e.g., lower turnover intentions) among women faculty in CS, and whether this association was mediated by lower work-to-life conflict.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 379 CS faculty across the U.S. (54% women, 52% with children at home) were surveyed during the COVID-19 pandemic (Fall 2020-Spring 2021).\n\n\nFindings\nCompared to men, women CS faculty reported significantly higher work-to-life conflict, and that higher work-to-life conflict predicted poorer retention-related work outcomes for all faculty. However, for women only, FSSB predicted lower levels of work-to-life conflict, and in turn, better retention-related work outcomes.\n\n\nPractical implications\nResults suggest that emotionally-supportive supervisor behaviors may lower work-to-life conflict during the pandemic, which has important implications for retention-related work outcomes among women faculty in CS.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nResearch has yet to disentangle how managers can help to retain women CS faculty in light of the increasing and changing work and home demands due to the pandemic. The present study focused on whether FSSB – particularly emotional support – may benefit women CS faculty.\n","PeriodicalId":237118,"journal":{"name":"Gender in Management: An International Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender in Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-10-2022-0326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic may negatively impact the careers of U.S. women faculty in computer science (CS) – a field with few women and high attrition rates among women – due to difficulties balancing increased work and family demands (author citation). Thus, it is important to understand whether supervisors may help to decrease this work-to-life conflict and increase the odds of retaining women faculty. This study examined whether family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB) were associated with better retention-related job outcomes (e.g., lower turnover intentions) among women faculty in CS, and whether this association was mediated by lower work-to-life conflict. Design/methodology/approach A total of 379 CS faculty across the U.S. (54% women, 52% with children at home) were surveyed during the COVID-19 pandemic (Fall 2020-Spring 2021). Findings Compared to men, women CS faculty reported significantly higher work-to-life conflict, and that higher work-to-life conflict predicted poorer retention-related work outcomes for all faculty. However, for women only, FSSB predicted lower levels of work-to-life conflict, and in turn, better retention-related work outcomes. Practical implications Results suggest that emotionally-supportive supervisor behaviors may lower work-to-life conflict during the pandemic, which has important implications for retention-related work outcomes among women faculty in CS. Originality/value Research has yet to disentangle how managers can help to retain women CS faculty in light of the increasing and changing work and home demands due to the pandemic. The present study focused on whether FSSB – particularly emotional support – may benefit women CS faculty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间保留美国stem女性教师:支持家庭的主管行为在减少工作与生活冲突中的重要作用
目的2019冠状病毒病大流行可能会对美国计算机科学(CS)女教师的职业生涯产生负面影响,因为难以平衡日益增加的工作和家庭需求(作者引用)。计算机科学(CS)是一个女性很少、女性流失率很高的领域。因此,重要的是要了解主管是否有助于减少这种工作与生活的冲突,并增加保留女教员的几率。本研究考察了家庭支持型主管行为(FSSB)是否与计算机科学女教师更好的留任相关工作结果(如较低的离职意向)相关,以及这种关联是否被较低的工作-生活冲突所中介。设计/方法/方法在COVID-19大流行期间(2020年秋季至2021年春季),美国共有379名CS教师(54%为女性,52%家中有孩子)接受了调查。研究结果:与男性相比,女性计算机科学教师报告的工作与生活冲突明显更高,而更高的工作与生活冲突预示着所有教师的留任相关工作成果会更差。然而,仅对女性而言,FSSB预示着较低水平的工作与生活冲突,反过来,更好的保留相关的工作成果。研究结果表明,在疫情期间,情感支持的主管行为可能会降低工作与生活的冲突,这对CS女教师的留任相关工作成果具有重要意义。鉴于疫情导致的工作和家庭需求不断增加和变化,研究人员尚未理清管理者如何帮助留住女性计算机科学教师。目前的研究集中在FSSB——特别是情感支持——是否对女性计算机教师有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doing business against gendered stigma: skilled female migrants in Hong Kong’s cross-border insurance business Crafting gender into meaningful work: experiences of women engaging in social entrepreneurship in China The influence mechanism of women’s entrepreneurial self-identity on entrepreneurial well-being: evidence from China Achieving sustainable development goals for mental health and gender equality through work-life balance and emotional intelligence National culture favouring gender equality, supervisor gender and supportive behaviours towards employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1