Sustainability Assessment of Flywheel Energy Storage for Grid Applications

S. Cellura, A. Mazza, E. Bompard, S. Corgnati
{"title":"Sustainability Assessment of Flywheel Energy Storage for Grid Applications","authors":"S. Cellura, A. Mazza, E. Bompard, S. Corgnati","doi":"10.1109/UPEC55022.2022.9917658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flywheel Energy Storage (FES) Systems could be exploited to support energy transition maintaining, at the same time, secure conditions in electricity grids. Among the current remunerated services, they can be deployed for Frequency Containment Reserve (FCR) and automatic Frequency Restoration Reserve (aFRR). However, several aspects have to be addressed, such as environmental impacts of these systems, and the costs. Additionally, since the exploitation of scarce raw materials for the assembling, also risk on supply disruption for these materials has to be taking into account. Main indicators exploited to evaluate Flywheels are the Global Warming Potential, the Cumulative Energy Demand, the Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) and the Supply Risk Indicator for Raw Materials. Most impacting components for Cumulative Energy Demand and Global Warming Potential are represented by the steel-based Vacuum Chamber and the Power Conversion System. Investment costs and charging costs are instead major contributors in LCOS, whereas replacement costs have a small contribution on it. The Supply Risk, assessed first for raw materials and then aggregated for the entire FES, is influenced mostly by Natural Graphite and Aluminium. Results on risk are almost not affected by considering the elements contained within the FES instead of raw materials. Finally, the comparison between greenhouse gases emitted during the manufacturing stage of alternative Storage Technologies shows that FES is the highest emitter, due to a low Energy on Power ratio.","PeriodicalId":371561,"journal":{"name":"2022 57th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 57th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC55022.2022.9917658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flywheel Energy Storage (FES) Systems could be exploited to support energy transition maintaining, at the same time, secure conditions in electricity grids. Among the current remunerated services, they can be deployed for Frequency Containment Reserve (FCR) and automatic Frequency Restoration Reserve (aFRR). However, several aspects have to be addressed, such as environmental impacts of these systems, and the costs. Additionally, since the exploitation of scarce raw materials for the assembling, also risk on supply disruption for these materials has to be taking into account. Main indicators exploited to evaluate Flywheels are the Global Warming Potential, the Cumulative Energy Demand, the Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) and the Supply Risk Indicator for Raw Materials. Most impacting components for Cumulative Energy Demand and Global Warming Potential are represented by the steel-based Vacuum Chamber and the Power Conversion System. Investment costs and charging costs are instead major contributors in LCOS, whereas replacement costs have a small contribution on it. The Supply Risk, assessed first for raw materials and then aggregated for the entire FES, is influenced mostly by Natural Graphite and Aluminium. Results on risk are almost not affected by considering the elements contained within the FES instead of raw materials. Finally, the comparison between greenhouse gases emitted during the manufacturing stage of alternative Storage Technologies shows that FES is the highest emitter, due to a low Energy on Power ratio.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电网应用飞轮储能的可持续性评估
飞轮储能(FES)系统可以用于支持能源转换,同时维护电网的安全条件。在目前的有偿服务中,它们可用于频率遏制储备(FCR)和自动频率恢复储备(aFRR)。然而,有几个方面必须加以解决,例如这些系统的环境影响和成本。此外,由于开采稀缺的原材料进行组装,还必须考虑到这些材料供应中断的风险。评估飞轮的主要指标是全球变暖潜势、累积能源需求、平准化储能成本(LCOS)和原材料供应风险指标。对累积能源需求和全球变暖潜势影响最大的是钢基真空室和功率转换系统。投资成本和收费成本是LCOS的主要贡献者,而重置成本对LCOS的贡献较小。供应风险首先对原材料进行评估,然后对整个FES进行汇总,主要受天然石墨和铝的影响。考虑FES中所含的元素而不是原材料,对风险结果几乎没有影响。最后,在替代存储技术制造阶段排放的温室气体之间的比较表明,由于能量功率比低,FES是最大的排放者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of Extending an Existing Substation Automation System using IEC 61850 Time Characteristic Curve Based Earth Fault Relay Selectivity Assessment for Optimal Overcurrent Relay Coordination in Distribution Networks Impact of the Photovoltaic Array Configuration on its Performance under Partial Shading Conditions The Impacts of The Temperature-Humidity Fluctuations in Substations and Practical Experimental Applications Synthesis and Characterization of Multi-level Pseudo-Random Sequences as Excitation Signals for System Identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1