RENDAHNYA TINGKAT OBJEKTIVITAS PEMBERITAAN SEPUTAR AGAMA DAN UMAT KRISTEN PADA ERAMUSLIM.COM

Suliana Khusnulkhatimah
{"title":"RENDAHNYA TINGKAT OBJEKTIVITAS PEMBERITAAN SEPUTAR AGAMA DAN UMAT KRISTEN PADA ERAMUSLIM.COM","authors":"Suliana Khusnulkhatimah","doi":"10.31506/jrk.v13i1.15516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a news, the facts presented by the media are second-hand reality and can be vulnerable to media agenda intervention. In the end, agenda media capable to separates the fact reconstruction process from journalistic procedures: the principle of objectivity. As a mass media with an Islamic supremacy viewpoint, Eramuslim.com often discusses religious sentiments through its news coverage, especially towards Christianity and its people. Eramuslim.com was even blocked by the Kementrian Komunikasi dan Informatika (Kominfo) twice, in March 2015 and January 2016, because it was considered as a site that supports radicalism or radicalism sympathizers. This research is based on agenda setting theory, and the concept of media objectivity. The research is based on a quantitative approach, with content analysis methods. The results shows, the level of objectivity of news related to Christianity published by Eramuslim.com during January 28, 2016 to May 24, 2021 was low. Only 3 news or 1.8% news of the 169 news researched, met the principle of objectivity.","PeriodicalId":344242,"journal":{"name":"JRK (Jurnal Riset Komunikasi)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRK (Jurnal Riset Komunikasi)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31506/jrk.v13i1.15516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a news, the facts presented by the media are second-hand reality and can be vulnerable to media agenda intervention. In the end, agenda media capable to separates the fact reconstruction process from journalistic procedures: the principle of objectivity. As a mass media with an Islamic supremacy viewpoint, Eramuslim.com often discusses religious sentiments through its news coverage, especially towards Christianity and its people. Eramuslim.com was even blocked by the Kementrian Komunikasi dan Informatika (Kominfo) twice, in March 2015 and January 2016, because it was considered as a site that supports radicalism or radicalism sympathizers. This research is based on agenda setting theory, and the concept of media objectivity. The research is based on a quantitative approach, with content analysis methods. The results shows, the level of objectivity of news related to Christianity published by Eramuslim.com during January 28, 2016 to May 24, 2021 was low. Only 3 news or 1.8% news of the 169 news researched, met the principle of objectivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于穆斯林网站上关于宗教和基督徒的新闻客观性较低
在新闻中,媒体呈现的事实是二手事实,容易受到媒体议程干预。最后,议程媒体能够将事实重构过程从新闻程序中分离出来:客观性原则。作为一个持伊斯兰至上观点的大众媒体,Eramuslim.com经常通过其新闻报道讨论宗教情绪,特别是对基督教及其人民。Eramuslim.com甚至在2015年3月和2016年1月两次被komentrian Komunikasi dan Informatika (Kominfo)封锁,因为它被认为是支持激进主义或激进主义同情者的网站。本研究以议程设定理论和媒介客观性概念为基础。本研究采用定量方法,采用内容分析方法。结果表明,Eramuslim.com在2016年1月28日至2021年5月24日期间发布的基督教相关新闻客观性水平较低。在被调查的169条新闻中,只有3条新闻(1.8%)符合客观性原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TRANSFORMASI BISNIS UMKM OMAH ECOPRINT BANTUL MELALUI KOMUNIKASI PEMASARAN BERBASIS MEDIA DIGITAL KOMODIFIKASI MISTIK PADA KANAL YOUTUBE JURNAL RISA PEMODELAN KEPUTUSAN PEMANFAATAN CYBER EXTENSION SEBAGAI SUMBER INFORMASI DI TINGKAT PENYULUH PERTANIAN (KASUS KABUPATEN SERANG) MENGUKUR DAN MEMAHAMI SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS BNPT DALAM MENGKONTER NARASI TERORISME ONLINE KOMUNIKASI CORPORATE BRANDING LICIN.LOVE MELALUI PROGRAM “LIMBAH JELANTAH”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1