The Legal Comparison of Transfer of Object Fiduciary by Debtor to Third Party without Creditor's Approval

Widhi Handoko, Bahtiyar Efendi
{"title":"The Legal Comparison of Transfer of Object Fiduciary by Debtor to Third Party without Creditor's Approval","authors":"Widhi Handoko, Bahtiyar Efendi","doi":"10.30659/akta.v9i3.26672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to find out about the Fiduciary provider in the Consumer Financing agreement with the Fiduciary Guarantee contained in the Fiduciary Guarantee Deed, it is forbidden to transfer the Fiduciary guarantee object to another party without the approval of the Fiduciary Recipient. This is because in Act No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees there are provisions regarding the prohibition to transfer objects of Fiduciary guarantees without the approval of Fiduciary Recipients to provide legal protection to Fiduciary Recipients. The research in this paper is a normative law research. In the debtor's relationship with a third party, there is no legal relationship because the transfer of the fiduciary object is not valid as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the conditions for the validity of the agreement. Articles 35 and 36 of the UUJF also regulate criminal sanctions that reaffirm the prohibition of transferring, mortgaging, or leasing fiduciary guarantees as objects. In connection with the principle of providing legal certainty, UUJF adopts the principle of registration of fiduciary guarantees. The benefit of a fiduciary agreement made in writing is that the creditor holding the fiduciary guarantee in his interest will demand the easiest way to prove the delivery of the guarantee to the debtor.","PeriodicalId":190203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akta","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i3.26672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out about the Fiduciary provider in the Consumer Financing agreement with the Fiduciary Guarantee contained in the Fiduciary Guarantee Deed, it is forbidden to transfer the Fiduciary guarantee object to another party without the approval of the Fiduciary Recipient. This is because in Act No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees there are provisions regarding the prohibition to transfer objects of Fiduciary guarantees without the approval of Fiduciary Recipients to provide legal protection to Fiduciary Recipients. The research in this paper is a normative law research. In the debtor's relationship with a third party, there is no legal relationship because the transfer of the fiduciary object is not valid as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the conditions for the validity of the agreement. Articles 35 and 36 of the UUJF also regulate criminal sanctions that reaffirm the prohibition of transferring, mortgaging, or leasing fiduciary guarantees as objects. In connection with the principle of providing legal certainty, UUJF adopts the principle of registration of fiduciary guarantees. The benefit of a fiduciary agreement made in writing is that the creditor holding the fiduciary guarantee in his interest will demand the easiest way to prove the delivery of the guarantee to the debtor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
债务人未经债权人同意向第三人转让信托标的的法律比较
本研究的目的是了解在消费者融资协议中的信义提供人,在信义担保书中包含信义担保,未经信义接收人同意,不得将信义担保对象转让给另一方。这是因为在1999年关于信义保函的第42号法令中有关于禁止在未经信义接收者批准的情况下转让信义保函标的的规定,以便为信义接收者提供法律保护。本文的研究是一项规范性的法律研究。在债务人与第三人的关系中,根据《民法典》第1320条关于协议生效条件的规定,因信义标的的转让无效而不存在法律关系。联合基金第35条和第36条还规定了刑事制裁,重申禁止转让、抵押或租赁信托担保作为对象。在提供法律确定性的原则方面,联合基金采用信义担保登记原则。以书面形式订立的信义协议的好处是,为其利益持有信义保函的债权人将要求以最简单的方式证明保函已交付给债务人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Re-Narrate the Relevance of Justice in Debtor Protection Related to the Parate Execution Carried Out by Separatist Creditors The Predatory Pricing Practice: The Challenges of Business Competition Law on Ride-Hailing Tariff’s War The Legal Implications of Forgery Sale & Purchase Binding Agreement by Notary Public The Implementation of Legal Position Regulation of Head of Services/Agency in Local Government The Implementation of a Complete Systematic Land Registration Program to Realize Legal Protection and Public Welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1