Comparative Analysis of Empirical Mode Decomposition and Discrete Wavelet Transform as Denoising Methods for Auditory Brainstem Response

Allen Lois Lanuza, Roxanne De Leon, C. R. Lucas
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Empirical Mode Decomposition and Discrete Wavelet Transform as Denoising Methods for Auditory Brainstem Response","authors":"Allen Lois Lanuza, Roxanne De Leon, C. R. Lucas","doi":"10.1109/ICCSCE54767.2022.9935643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peak latency measurement of the patient's Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) essential wave components (Waves I-V) is the usual method in hearing screening to determine the likelihood of hearing impairment. To visualize the peaks of Waves I-V, averaging about 2000 ABR sweeps is necessary for reducing the background noise caused by power line interference and myogenic activity; however, this method is time-consuming and inconvenient for patients and healthcare workers. The study aims to use signal denoising methods to denoise ABRs averaged with fewer sweeps without affecting their functionality. Two deterministic signal denoising approaches, Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), were evaluated and compared to determine which could produce functional denoised ABRs using fewer sweeps. For the 1 kHz stimulus frequency, DWT produced functional ABRs with fewer sweeps than EMD for stimulus intensities of 75, 65, 55 and 50 dB peSPL. For the 4 kHz stimulus frequency, only the DWT method could produce functional ABRs with fewer sweeps. DWT method performs better than EMD in producing clinically relevant denoised ABR for most stimulus descriptions. The findings can help audiologists use the DWT denoising approach when averaging noisy ABRs with fewer sweeps to address the problems caused by the time-consuming conventional averaging method.","PeriodicalId":346014,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)","volume":"272 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 12th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSCE54767.2022.9935643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peak latency measurement of the patient's Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) essential wave components (Waves I-V) is the usual method in hearing screening to determine the likelihood of hearing impairment. To visualize the peaks of Waves I-V, averaging about 2000 ABR sweeps is necessary for reducing the background noise caused by power line interference and myogenic activity; however, this method is time-consuming and inconvenient for patients and healthcare workers. The study aims to use signal denoising methods to denoise ABRs averaged with fewer sweeps without affecting their functionality. Two deterministic signal denoising approaches, Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), were evaluated and compared to determine which could produce functional denoised ABRs using fewer sweeps. For the 1 kHz stimulus frequency, DWT produced functional ABRs with fewer sweeps than EMD for stimulus intensities of 75, 65, 55 and 50 dB peSPL. For the 4 kHz stimulus frequency, only the DWT method could produce functional ABRs with fewer sweeps. DWT method performs better than EMD in producing clinically relevant denoised ABR for most stimulus descriptions. The findings can help audiologists use the DWT denoising approach when averaging noisy ABRs with fewer sweeps to address the problems caused by the time-consuming conventional averaging method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经验模态分解与离散小波变换作为听觉脑干响应去噪方法的比较分析
听觉脑干反应(ABR)基本波分量(波I-V)的峰值潜伏期测量是听力筛查中确定听力障碍可能性的常用方法。为了可视化波I-V的峰值,平均约2000 ABR扫描是必要的,以减少由电力线干扰和肌生成活动引起的背景噪声;然而,这种方法耗时长,对患者和医护人员不方便。本研究旨在利用信号去噪方法,在不影响abr功能的情况下,对扫描次数较少的平均abr进行去噪。对两种确定性信号去噪方法——经验模态分解(EMD)和离散小波变换(DWT)进行了评估和比较,以确定哪种方法可以使用更少的扫描产生功能去噪的abr。对于1 kHz的刺激频率,在75、65、55和50 dB peSPL的刺激强度下,DWT产生的功能性abr比EMD产生的扫描次数少。对于4 kHz的刺激频率,只有DWT方法可以产生较少扫描次数的功能性abr。对于大多数刺激描述,DWT方法在产生与临床相关的去噪ABR方面优于EMD方法。该研究结果可以帮助听力学家使用DWT去噪方法,以较少的扫描次数平均有噪声的abr,以解决耗时的传统平均方法所带来的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and Enforcements of Wireless Based Matrix LED Message Moving Display by HD-W60 Microcontroller Multilayer Perceptron Optimization of ECG Peaks for Cardiac Abnormality Detection Domestic Trash Classification with Transfer Learning Using VGG16 Telemetry System for Highland Tomato Plants Using Ubidots Platform Systematic Literature Review of Security Control Assessment Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1