Investigation of Bandwidth Reservation for Segment Routing

Amin Qassoud, Chung-Horng Lung
{"title":"Investigation of Bandwidth Reservation for Segment Routing","authors":"Amin Qassoud, Chung-Horng Lung","doi":"10.1109/iemcon53756.2021.9623246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traffic Engineering (TE) is a critical topic in network routing and switching. The topic has been intensively investigated. New network architecture has also been proposed to improve TE, e.g., Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) architecture. MPLS has been widely used to in the past 15 years or so. However, the overhead associated with MPLS architecture is high, particularly the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)-TE protocol used for signaling and path creation/maintenance. Segment Routing (SR) is a relatively new network solution to mitigate the high overhead issue of MPLS/RSVP- TE and it has gained increasing attention. SR for IPv6 (SRv6) has drawn a great deal of attention recently for efficient and flexible TE features. However, more research is still needed for SRv6-based bandwidth reservation for TE, as RSVP- TE used for bandwidth reservation is no longer part of SR. The objective of this paper is to develop bandwidth reservation algorithms for SR-based solutions and investigate the performance of those algorithms. The current focus is on depth-first search (DFS) and breath first search (BFS) bandwidth reservation algorithms. The preliminary outcomes show that BFS results in higher bandwidth usage, whereas DFS is more time efficient in path computations.","PeriodicalId":272590,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iemcon53756.2021.9623246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Traffic Engineering (TE) is a critical topic in network routing and switching. The topic has been intensively investigated. New network architecture has also been proposed to improve TE, e.g., Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) architecture. MPLS has been widely used to in the past 15 years or so. However, the overhead associated with MPLS architecture is high, particularly the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)-TE protocol used for signaling and path creation/maintenance. Segment Routing (SR) is a relatively new network solution to mitigate the high overhead issue of MPLS/RSVP- TE and it has gained increasing attention. SR for IPv6 (SRv6) has drawn a great deal of attention recently for efficient and flexible TE features. However, more research is still needed for SRv6-based bandwidth reservation for TE, as RSVP- TE used for bandwidth reservation is no longer part of SR. The objective of this paper is to develop bandwidth reservation algorithms for SR-based solutions and investigate the performance of those algorithms. The current focus is on depth-first search (DFS) and breath first search (BFS) bandwidth reservation algorithms. The preliminary outcomes show that BFS results in higher bandwidth usage, whereas DFS is more time efficient in path computations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
段路由中带宽预留的研究
流量工程(TE)是网络路由与交换中的一个重要课题。这个话题已被深入研究。新的网络架构也被提出来改进TE,例如多协议标签交换(MPLS)架构。MPLS在过去的15年里得到了广泛的应用。但是,与MPLS体系结构相关的开销很高,特别是用于信令和路径创建/维护的资源保留协议(RSVP)-TE协议。SR (Segment Routing,分段路由)是一种较新的解决MPLS/RSVP- TE高开销问题的网络解决方案,越来越受到人们的关注。SR for IPv6 (SRv6)最近因其高效和灵活的TE特性而引起了极大的关注。然而,由于用于带宽预留的RSVP- TE不再是sr的一部分,因此基于srv6的TE带宽预留还需要更多的研究。本文的目的是为基于sr的解决方案开发带宽预留算法并研究这些算法的性能。目前的研究重点是深度优先搜索(DFS)和呼吸优先搜索(BFS)带宽预留算法。初步结果表明,BFS具有更高的带宽利用率,而DFS在路径计算方面具有更高的时间效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maximization of the User Association of a Low-Power Tier Deploying Biased User Association Scheme in 5G Multi-Tier Heterogeneous Network A Deep Reinforcement Learning: Location-based Resource Allocation for Congested C-V2X Scenario A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Chronic Kidney Disease in Human Evaluation of a bio-socially inspired secure DSA scheme using testbed-calibrated hybrid simulations Siamese Network based Pulse and Signal Attribute Identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1