The impact of audit committee effectiveness on firms’ outcomes in China: a systematic review

Bushra Komal, Bilal, Chengang Ye, R. Salem
{"title":"The impact of audit committee effectiveness on firms’ outcomes in China: a systematic review","authors":"Bushra Komal, Bilal, Chengang Ye, R. Salem","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-05-2022-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to discuss the academic literature on the impact of audit committee effectiveness on different outcomes (accounting, auditing, governance and economics) in China.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors have conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines.\n\n\nFindings\nThe key finding is that the regulatory organisations in China, such as the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC), need to play the active role that is expected of them to enhance the transparency and independence of an audit committee. Also, Chinese listed companies are facing institutional barriers (CEO power, concentrated ownership and government influence) to effectively implement the imported concept within China. Research relating to the audit committee's effectiveness has focused mainly on agency and resource dependence perspectives.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nChina’s regulatory bodies (CSRC and SASAC) should make necessary reforms to enhance the audit committee’s effectiveness. This study also provides implications for the other settings that have imported the audit committee concept from the Anglo-American countries.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the literature by synthesising the prior mixed findings on audit committee literature in China and providing suggestions to the regulators and future research.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-05-2022-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to discuss the academic literature on the impact of audit committee effectiveness on different outcomes (accounting, auditing, governance and economics) in China. Design/methodology/approach The authors have conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines. Findings The key finding is that the regulatory organisations in China, such as the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC), need to play the active role that is expected of them to enhance the transparency and independence of an audit committee. Also, Chinese listed companies are facing institutional barriers (CEO power, concentrated ownership and government influence) to effectively implement the imported concept within China. Research relating to the audit committee's effectiveness has focused mainly on agency and resource dependence perspectives. Research limitations/implications China’s regulatory bodies (CSRC and SASAC) should make necessary reforms to enhance the audit committee’s effectiveness. This study also provides implications for the other settings that have imported the audit committee concept from the Anglo-American countries. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by synthesising the prior mixed findings on audit committee literature in China and providing suggestions to the regulators and future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国审计委员会有效性对公司绩效的影响:系统回顾
本文旨在探讨中国审计委员会有效性对不同结果(会计、审计、治理和经济)影响的学术文献。设计/方法/方法作者使用PRISMA指南进行了系统的综述。主要发现是,中国的监管机构,如中国证券监督管理委员会(CSRC)和国有资产监督管理委员会(SASAC),需要发挥人们期望它们发挥的积极作用,以提高审计委员会的透明度和独立性。此外,中国上市公司还面临着制度性障碍(CEO权力、股权集中和政府影响),难以在中国有效实施引进的理念。有关审计委员会有效性的研究主要集中在机构和资源依赖的观点上。中国的监管机构(中国证监会和国资委)应该进行必要的改革,以提高审计委员会的有效性。本研究也为其他从英美国家引进审计委员会概念的国家提供了启示。原创性/价值本研究通过综合以往关于中国审计委员会文献的混合发现,并为监管者和未来的研究提供建议,从而为文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Financial innovation and gender dynamics: a comparative study of male and female FinTech adoption in emerging economies Board gender diversity, audit quality, and the moderating role of political connections: evidence from the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC) Manager sentiment, policy uncertainty, ESG disclosure and firm performance: a large language model in corporate landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1