Facebook: when education meets privacy

Steven Bruneel, K. Wit, Jef C. Verhoeven, J. Elen
{"title":"Facebook: when education meets privacy","authors":"Steven Bruneel, K. Wit, Jef C. Verhoeven, J. Elen","doi":"10.28945/1868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In 1997, SixDegrees.com was launched, a website now believed to be a precursor of more current social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Hyves. Today the use of social networking sites (hence SNSs) has become commonplace amongst youngsters and young adults. Tufekci (2008) found that between 80% and 90% of college students are a member of at least one SNS. The first SNS that gained worldwide popularity was MySpace. Barely four years after its launch in 2003, it had become by far the most adopted SNS amongst youngsters, with 100 million users and attracting 230,000 new users each day at some point in time (Lenhart & Madden, 2007; Sellers, 2006). According to Hinduja and Patchin (2008), this popularity is \"due in large part not because of innovative functionality and utility, but because it centralized many attractive functions that were already a part of other social networking sites in a user-friendly way\" (p. 130). Not surprisingly, MySpace is not the only SNS available (for an overview, see Boyd & Ellison, 2007); Facebook seems to be the most popular for people of all ages (Doughtery, 2010; see also Judd & Kennedy, 2010). In a follow-up study in September 2009 by Lenhart, Purcell, Smith, and Zickuhr (2010), 71% of a sample of American young adults (between 18 and 29 years old) owned a Facebook account, 66% a MySpace account, and 7% a LinkedIn account. In July 2010, Facebook reached over 500 million active users (Facebook, 2010). In Belgium alone, more than 4.6 million active users (of the 7 million who surf the Internet) have a profile on Facebook (Socialbakers, 2012). In this contribution, the focus is upon Facebook. Taking into account Facebook's current popularity amongst college students, much research has been established to explore the possibility of using Facebook as an educational tool. Such interest is, of course, not new. Ever since the introduction of television into schools and the increasing popularity of computers and video games, scholars have been paying attention to education that is in some way technologically facilitated (Cuban, 1986). So is the case with regard to SNSs: a lot of research concerning the SNSeducation relationship has been conducted over the last years (e.g. Anderson, 2007; Anderson & Dron, 2011; Bugeja, 2006; Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010; Mason & Rennie, 2008; Mazman & Usluel, 2010; Roblyer, McDaniel, Webb, Herman, & Witty, 2010; Sandars & Schroter, 2007; Selwyn, 2009) and resulted in some systematic reviews (e.g. Manca & Ranieri, 2013). Moreover, some of them argue that SNSs entail a lot of educational possibilities (e.g. Greenhow, 2011; Halverson, 2011; Lee & McLoughlin, 2008; Selwyn, 2007). For instance, Lee and McLoughlin (2008) claim that SNSs are pedagogical tools, because one can use them for content creation, collaborative information discovery and sharing, and knowledge and information aggregation and modification. Despite high expectancies with respect to the potential of Facebook, current research on the relationship between Facebook use and academic achievement shows no--or even a negative--relationship (e.g., Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010; Pasek, More, & Hargittai, 2009). Yet, what seems for the most part to be ignored in the research literature regarding SNSs, in our view, is the willingness of students to accept Facebook as an educational tool, a tool that is used in an instructional context to foster their learning processes (Roblyer et al., 2010). Therefore, we delve into students' own, self-reported perspectives regarding the use of Facebook in education, as further insight into students' opinions, to add value within this currently popular research domain. In case students do not appreciate the use of Facebook as a tool for educational purposes, it can be expected that the added value of Facebook will be rather limited (cf. Perkins & Turpen, 2009). After this short introduction on the popularity of Facebook, this article briefly presents role theory and reference group theory, as we will use them as an interpretive framework. …","PeriodicalId":104467,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/1868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Introduction In 1997, SixDegrees.com was launched, a website now believed to be a precursor of more current social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Hyves. Today the use of social networking sites (hence SNSs) has become commonplace amongst youngsters and young adults. Tufekci (2008) found that between 80% and 90% of college students are a member of at least one SNS. The first SNS that gained worldwide popularity was MySpace. Barely four years after its launch in 2003, it had become by far the most adopted SNS amongst youngsters, with 100 million users and attracting 230,000 new users each day at some point in time (Lenhart & Madden, 2007; Sellers, 2006). According to Hinduja and Patchin (2008), this popularity is "due in large part not because of innovative functionality and utility, but because it centralized many attractive functions that were already a part of other social networking sites in a user-friendly way" (p. 130). Not surprisingly, MySpace is not the only SNS available (for an overview, see Boyd & Ellison, 2007); Facebook seems to be the most popular for people of all ages (Doughtery, 2010; see also Judd & Kennedy, 2010). In a follow-up study in September 2009 by Lenhart, Purcell, Smith, and Zickuhr (2010), 71% of a sample of American young adults (between 18 and 29 years old) owned a Facebook account, 66% a MySpace account, and 7% a LinkedIn account. In July 2010, Facebook reached over 500 million active users (Facebook, 2010). In Belgium alone, more than 4.6 million active users (of the 7 million who surf the Internet) have a profile on Facebook (Socialbakers, 2012). In this contribution, the focus is upon Facebook. Taking into account Facebook's current popularity amongst college students, much research has been established to explore the possibility of using Facebook as an educational tool. Such interest is, of course, not new. Ever since the introduction of television into schools and the increasing popularity of computers and video games, scholars have been paying attention to education that is in some way technologically facilitated (Cuban, 1986). So is the case with regard to SNSs: a lot of research concerning the SNSeducation relationship has been conducted over the last years (e.g. Anderson, 2007; Anderson & Dron, 2011; Bugeja, 2006; Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010; Mason & Rennie, 2008; Mazman & Usluel, 2010; Roblyer, McDaniel, Webb, Herman, & Witty, 2010; Sandars & Schroter, 2007; Selwyn, 2009) and resulted in some systematic reviews (e.g. Manca & Ranieri, 2013). Moreover, some of them argue that SNSs entail a lot of educational possibilities (e.g. Greenhow, 2011; Halverson, 2011; Lee & McLoughlin, 2008; Selwyn, 2007). For instance, Lee and McLoughlin (2008) claim that SNSs are pedagogical tools, because one can use them for content creation, collaborative information discovery and sharing, and knowledge and information aggregation and modification. Despite high expectancies with respect to the potential of Facebook, current research on the relationship between Facebook use and academic achievement shows no--or even a negative--relationship (e.g., Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010; Pasek, More, & Hargittai, 2009). Yet, what seems for the most part to be ignored in the research literature regarding SNSs, in our view, is the willingness of students to accept Facebook as an educational tool, a tool that is used in an instructional context to foster their learning processes (Roblyer et al., 2010). Therefore, we delve into students' own, self-reported perspectives regarding the use of Facebook in education, as further insight into students' opinions, to add value within this currently popular research domain. In case students do not appreciate the use of Facebook as a tool for educational purposes, it can be expected that the added value of Facebook will be rather limited (cf. Perkins & Turpen, 2009). After this short introduction on the popularity of Facebook, this article briefly presents role theory and reference group theory, as we will use them as an interpretive framework. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facebook:当教育与隐私相遇
1997年,SixDegrees.com成立,这个网站现在被认为是Facebook、MySpace、LinkedIn、Twitter和Hyves等更流行的社交网站的先驱。如今,社交网站(即sns)的使用在年轻人和年轻人中已经变得司空见惯。Tufekci(2008)发现80% - 90%的大学生是至少一个社交网站的会员。第一个获得全球知名度的社交网站是MySpace。在2003年发布仅仅4年之后,它便成为了最受年轻人欢迎的社交网络,拥有1亿用户,并且每天都会吸引23万新用户。卖家,2006)。根据Hinduja和Patchin(2008)的说法,这种流行“在很大程度上不是由于创新的功能和实用性,而是因为它以一种用户友好的方式集中了许多已经成为其他社交网站一部分的有吸引力的功能”(第130页)。毫无疑问,MySpace并不是唯一可用的社交网络(关于概述,请参阅Boyd & Ellison, 2007);Facebook似乎最受各个年龄段的人欢迎(Doughtery, 2010;另见Judd & Kennedy, 2010)。在2009年9月Lenhart, Purcell, Smith和Zickuhr(2010)的一项后续研究中,71%的美国年轻人(18 - 29岁)拥有Facebook账户,66%拥有MySpace账户,7%拥有LinkedIn账户。2010年7月,Facebook活跃用户超过5亿(Facebook, 2010)。仅在比利时,就有超过460万活跃用户(700万上网用户)在Facebook上拥有个人资料(Socialbakers, 2012)。在这篇文章中,重点是Facebook。考虑到Facebook目前在大学生中的受欢迎程度,已经建立了许多研究来探索将Facebook用作教育工具的可能性。当然,这种兴趣并不新鲜。自从电视进入学校,电脑和电子游戏日益普及以来,学者们就开始关注在某种程度上由技术促进的教育(Cuban, 1986)。社交媒体也是如此:在过去的几年里,人们进行了大量关于社交媒体诱惑关系的研究(例如Anderson, 2007;Anderson & Dron, 2011;Bugeja, 2006;Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010;Mason & Rennie, 2008;Mazman & Usluel, 2010;Roblyer, McDaniel, Webb, Herman, & Witty, 2010;Sandars & Schroter, 2007;Selwyn, 2009),并导致了一些系统的评论(例如Manca & Ranieri, 2013)。此外,他们中的一些人认为社交网络带来了许多教育可能性(例如Greenhow, 2011;霍尔沃森,2011;Lee & McLoughlin, 2008;塞尔温,2007)。例如,Lee和McLoughlin(2008)声称社交网站是一种教学工具,因为人们可以使用它们来进行内容创作,协作信息发现和共享,以及知识和信息的聚合和修改。尽管人们对Facebook的潜力抱有很高的期望,但目前关于Facebook使用与学业成就之间关系的研究表明,两者之间没有关系,甚至是负相关关系(例如,Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010;Pasek, More, & Hargittai, 2009)。然而,在我们看来,在大多数关于社交媒体的研究文献中,似乎被忽视的是,学生愿意接受Facebook作为一种教育工具,一种在教学环境中用于促进他们学习过程的工具(Roblyer et al., 2010)。因此,我们深入研究学生自己的、自我报告的关于在教育中使用Facebook的观点,作为对学生观点的进一步洞察,在这个当前流行的研究领域增加价值。如果学生不欣赏使用Facebook作为教育目的的工具,可以预期,Facebook的附加值将是相当有限的(cf. Perkins & Turpen, 2009)。在简要介绍Facebook的流行之后,本文将简要介绍角色理论和参考群体理论,因为我们将使用它们作为解释框架。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a Conceptual Framework for Evaluation of E-Content of Virtual Courses: E-Learning Center of an Iranian University Case Study. Beyond Adoption: Barriers to an Online Assignment Submission System Continued Use Student Perceptions of Various E-Learning Components Open the Windows of Communication: Promoting Interpersonal and Group Interactions Using Blogs in Higher Education An Agent-based Federated Learning Object Search Service
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1