A Study of Hybridized Smell Agent Symbiotic Organism Search in Congress on Evolutionary Computation Functions

S. Mohammed
{"title":"A Study of Hybridized Smell Agent Symbiotic Organism Search in Congress on Evolutionary Computation Functions","authors":"S. Mohammed","doi":"10.56471/slujst.v6i.350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a study of the Smell Agent Symbiotic Organism Search (SASOS) hybrid algorithm. SASOS is developed from bioinspired Smell Agent-Based Optimization(SAO) and Symbiosis Organism Search (SOS) algorithms. Bioinspired algorithms often lack a balance between speed and accuracy to achieve optimal performance efficiency and a global search for the best solution. To address these challenges, the algorithm reduces the imbalance between diversification and intensification in bioinspired algorithms to improve the search for global optima. SASOS performance was evaluated in sixteen selected Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) functions using Aggregative Best Counts (ABC) compared to the regular SAO and SOS algorithms. For an advanced performance comparison, the convergence study was carried out on each CEC function to assess the fitness of the algorithms based on the Desirable Convergence Goal (DCG). Evaluation results using 50 iterations have shown that SASOS performed better withABCof56.25%than the SAO and SOS algorithms with ABC of 28.12% and 15.63%, respectively, in standard benchmark functions. Furthermore, in the convergence study, 1000 iterations were superimposed for each algorithm on the CEC functions. The convergence results showed that SASOS obtained the best DCG of 58.83%compared to SOS and SAO with DCG of 25.00% and 16.67%, respectively. These results made the performance of the hybrid SASOS uniquely different from other similar approaches.This is because the hybrid SASOS satisfactorily balanced the diversification and intensification phases in the bioinspired SAO and SOS algorithms. The eligible characteristics of the hybrid SASOS with respect to ABC and DCG showed its compatibilityand significance forvarious engineering optimizationapplications","PeriodicalId":299818,"journal":{"name":"SLU Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLU Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56471/slujst.v6i.350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the Smell Agent Symbiotic Organism Search (SASOS) hybrid algorithm. SASOS is developed from bioinspired Smell Agent-Based Optimization(SAO) and Symbiosis Organism Search (SOS) algorithms. Bioinspired algorithms often lack a balance between speed and accuracy to achieve optimal performance efficiency and a global search for the best solution. To address these challenges, the algorithm reduces the imbalance between diversification and intensification in bioinspired algorithms to improve the search for global optima. SASOS performance was evaluated in sixteen selected Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) functions using Aggregative Best Counts (ABC) compared to the regular SAO and SOS algorithms. For an advanced performance comparison, the convergence study was carried out on each CEC function to assess the fitness of the algorithms based on the Desirable Convergence Goal (DCG). Evaluation results using 50 iterations have shown that SASOS performed better withABCof56.25%than the SAO and SOS algorithms with ABC of 28.12% and 15.63%, respectively, in standard benchmark functions. Furthermore, in the convergence study, 1000 iterations were superimposed for each algorithm on the CEC functions. The convergence results showed that SASOS obtained the best DCG of 58.83%compared to SOS and SAO with DCG of 25.00% and 16.67%, respectively. These results made the performance of the hybrid SASOS uniquely different from other similar approaches.This is because the hybrid SASOS satisfactorily balanced the diversification and intensification phases in the bioinspired SAO and SOS algorithms. The eligible characteristics of the hybrid SASOS with respect to ABC and DCG showed its compatibilityand significance forvarious engineering optimizationapplications
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于进化计算函数的杂交嗅觉剂共生生物搜索研究
本文研究了气味剂共生生物搜索(SASOS)混合算法。SASOS是由基于生物的气味代理优化(SAO)和共生生物搜索(SOS)算法发展而来的。生物启发算法通常缺乏速度和准确性之间的平衡,以实现最佳性能效率和全局搜索最佳解决方案。为了解决这些挑战,该算法减少了生物启发算法中多样化和集约化之间的不平衡,以改善对全局最优的搜索。与常规SAO和SOS算法相比,SASOS的性能在16个选定的进化计算大会(CEC)函数中使用聚合最佳计数(ABC)进行评估。为了进行高级性能比较,对每个CEC函数进行收敛性研究,以评估基于理想收敛目标(DCG)的算法的适应度。50次迭代的评价结果表明,SASOS算法的abcof56.25%优于SAO算法和SOS算法,ABC分别为28.12%和15.63%。此外,在收敛性研究中,每种算法在CEC函数上叠加1000次迭代。收敛结果表明,SASOS的DCG为58.83%,而SOS和SAO的DCG分别为25.00%和16.67%。这些结果使得混合SASOS的性能与其他类似方法截然不同。这是因为混合SASOS令人满意地平衡了生物启发SAO和SOS算法中的多样化和强化阶段。混合SASOS在ABC和DCG方面的合格特性显示了其在各种工程优化应用中的兼容性和意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling of Post-COVID-19 Food Production Index in Nigeria using Box-Jenkins Methodology Sum-Rate Systematic Intercell Interference Coordination Techniques for5GHeterogeneous Networks Towards the Choice of Better Social Media Platform for Knowledge Delivery: Exploratory Study in University of Ilorin Schemes for Extending the Network Lifetime of Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks Design and Analysis of 1x4 and 1x8 Circular Patch Microstrip Antenna Array for IWSN Application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1