Complex Thinking for Kansei Studies - For an epistemological shift of the field

P. Lévy
{"title":"Complex Thinking for Kansei Studies - For an epistemological shift of the field","authors":"P. Lévy","doi":"10.5821/conference-9788419184849.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This position paper questions the current situation of kansei studies as a multidisciplinary field of research. The observations on the structure of the research community and on the way papers address the notion of kansei point out the pluridisciplinary nature of the field, centred on the ill-defined notion of kansei. This situation is thought to be an epistemological issue, rather than a structural one. To address this epistemological challenge, we argue to shift towards complex thinking as a paradigm to rethink the field of kansei studies and the notion of kansei. Positioning kansei studies as a complex unit rich of multiple disciplines and of multiple perspectives on kansei lead to a richer dynamic within the research community, and open new ways of collaboration within the community and outside with related disciplines. Therefore, we call for this shift that may impulse a new dynamic in the community actually rich of a great variety of disciplines and practices.","PeriodicalId":433529,"journal":{"name":"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788419184849.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This position paper questions the current situation of kansei studies as a multidisciplinary field of research. The observations on the structure of the research community and on the way papers address the notion of kansei point out the pluridisciplinary nature of the field, centred on the ill-defined notion of kansei. This situation is thought to be an epistemological issue, rather than a structural one. To address this epistemological challenge, we argue to shift towards complex thinking as a paradigm to rethink the field of kansei studies and the notion of kansei. Positioning kansei studies as a complex unit rich of multiple disciplines and of multiple perspectives on kansei lead to a richer dynamic within the research community, and open new ways of collaboration within the community and outside with related disciplines. Therefore, we call for this shift that may impulse a new dynamic in the community actually rich of a great variety of disciplines and practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感性研究的复杂思考——为了领域的认识论转变
本文对感性研究作为一个多学科研究领域的现状提出了质疑。对研究界结构的观察和对论文处理感性概念的方式指出了该领域的多学科性质,集中在感性概念的不明确定义上。这种情况被认为是一个认识论问题,而不是结构问题。为了解决这一认识论上的挑战,我们主张将复杂思维作为一种范式来重新思考感性研究领域和感性概念。将感性研究定位为一个复杂的单元,丰富了多学科和对感性的多种观点,可以在研究社区内产生更丰富的动态,并为社区内外与相关学科的合作开辟新的途径。因此,我们呼吁这种转变,这可能会推动社区的新动力,实际上是丰富的各种学科和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teamwork in context of diversity A Study on the Relationship Between Decision-making Speed and Kansei Through Data Visualization Visualization of affective information in music using chironomie The relationship between leisure activities and subjective wellbeing among middle-aged chinese people Relationship between behaviors for purchasing OTC medicines and literacy of consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1