Parental Involvement Among Collegiate Student-Athletes: An Analysis Across NCAA Divisions

Katie Lowe, T. Dorsch, M. Kaye, J. Arnett, Logan K. Lyons, Amanda N. Faherty, Lindsey H. Menendez
{"title":"Parental Involvement Among Collegiate Student-Athletes: An Analysis Across NCAA Divisions","authors":"Katie Lowe, T. Dorsch, M. Kaye, J. Arnett, Logan K. Lyons, Amanda N. Faherty, Lindsey H. Menendez","doi":"10.1123/JIS.2018-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite emerging evidence of a link between parental involvement and student-athletes’ (SA) experiences, and the desire for educational programming for parents of these SAs, previous research has been limited to the Division I level. This has prevented the ability to inform, develop, and deliver parent programming across the NCAA’s diverse membership. The present study was designed to descriptively assess SA reports of parental involvement (i.e., support, contact, academic engagement, athletic engagement) across NCAA Division I, II, and III member institutions and examine the potential impact of this involvement on SAs’ experiences (i.e., academic self-efficacy, athletic satisfaction, well-being, individuation). Participants were 455 SAs (53% female; 81% Caucasian; Mage = 19.81, SD = 1.65) from DI (30%), DII (37%), and DIII (33%) institutions, who completed an online survey with items assessing parental involvement and SA experiences. Regarding academic classification, 32% were freshmen, 24% sophomores, 22% juniors, and 22% seniors. Results provide novel evidence for an absence of division-wide differences in average levels of involvement and no variability in links between involvement and SA experiences across divisions. Results complement and extend previous research by offering a clearer understanding of differential associations between involvement and SAs’ experiences regardless of division, notably that involvement bolstered well-being but also strongly detracted from individuation. Findings highlight the importance of developing programs to promote positive and developmentally-appropriate parental involvement across the spectrum of intercollegiate athletics, especially given the absence of evidence-based resources presently offered by the NCAA.","PeriodicalId":354349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercollegiate Sport","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercollegiate Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/JIS.2018-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Despite emerging evidence of a link between parental involvement and student-athletes’ (SA) experiences, and the desire for educational programming for parents of these SAs, previous research has been limited to the Division I level. This has prevented the ability to inform, develop, and deliver parent programming across the NCAA’s diverse membership. The present study was designed to descriptively assess SA reports of parental involvement (i.e., support, contact, academic engagement, athletic engagement) across NCAA Division I, II, and III member institutions and examine the potential impact of this involvement on SAs’ experiences (i.e., academic self-efficacy, athletic satisfaction, well-being, individuation). Participants were 455 SAs (53% female; 81% Caucasian; Mage = 19.81, SD = 1.65) from DI (30%), DII (37%), and DIII (33%) institutions, who completed an online survey with items assessing parental involvement and SA experiences. Regarding academic classification, 32% were freshmen, 24% sophomores, 22% juniors, and 22% seniors. Results provide novel evidence for an absence of division-wide differences in average levels of involvement and no variability in links between involvement and SA experiences across divisions. Results complement and extend previous research by offering a clearer understanding of differential associations between involvement and SAs’ experiences regardless of division, notably that involvement bolstered well-being but also strongly detracted from individuation. Findings highlight the importance of developing programs to promote positive and developmentally-appropriate parental involvement across the spectrum of intercollegiate athletics, especially given the absence of evidence-based resources presently offered by the NCAA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生运动员的父母参与:横跨NCAA分部的分析
尽管越来越多的证据表明父母参与与学生运动员(SA)经历之间存在联系,并且这些学生运动员的父母渴望教育计划,但以前的研究仅限于一级水平。这阻碍了在NCAA的不同成员中通知、开发和交付家长节目的能力。本研究旨在描述性地评估全美大学生体育协会(NCAA) I、II和III分部成员机构的学生家长参与(即支持、接触、学术参与、运动参与)的报告,并研究这种参与对学生体验(即学术自我效能感、运动满意度、幸福感、个性化)的潜在影响。参与者为455名SAs(53%为女性;81%的白人;Mage = 19.81, SD = 1.65)来自DI (30%), DII(37%)和DIII(33%)机构,他们完成了一项在线调查,其中包括评估父母参与和SA经历的项目。在专业分类方面,新生占32%,二年级占24%,三年级占22%,大四占22%。结果提供了新的证据,证明在平均投入水平上没有全部门的差异,在投入和跨部门的SA经验之间的联系没有可变性。研究结果补充并扩展了先前的研究,提供了更清晰的理解,即参与与情景教师经历之间的差异关联,而不考虑分工,特别是参与促进了幸福感,但也严重损害了个性化。研究结果强调了开发项目的重要性,以促进积极和发展适当的家长参与校际体育活动,特别是考虑到目前NCAA提供的缺乏循证资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coaching Transition and Nature of Change: An Examination of NCAA DI Team Sports “Is it Hard Out Here for a Player?”: Understanding the Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Athletic Identity Among College Student Athletes "From Sweats to Suits": Administrators' Recommendations For Student-Athlete Career Development Services. Understanding The Lived Experiences of Black Female College Athletes and Factors that Influence their Anxiety. Examining classroom learning behaviors academic and athletic motivation in collegiate athletes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1