Knowledge is Power, Understanding is Impact: Utility and Beyond Goals, Explanation Quality, and Fairness in Path Reasoning Recommendation

Giacomo Balloccu, Ludovico Boratto, Christian Cancedda, G. Fenu, M. Marras
{"title":"Knowledge is Power, Understanding is Impact: Utility and Beyond Goals, Explanation Quality, and Fairness in Path Reasoning Recommendation","authors":"Giacomo Balloccu, Ludovico Boratto, Christian Cancedda, G. Fenu, M. Marras","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2301.05944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Path reasoning is a notable recommendation approach that models high-order user-product relations, based on a Knowledge Graph (KG). This approach can extract reasoning paths between recommended products and already experienced products and, then, turn such paths into textual explanations for the user. Unfortunately, evaluation protocols in this field appear heterogeneous and limited, making it hard to contextualize the impact of the existing methods. In this paper, we replicated three state-of-the-art relevant path reasoning recommendation methods proposed in top-tier conferences. Under a common evaluation protocol, based on two public data sets and in comparison with other knowledge-aware methods, we then studied the extent to which they meet recommendation utility and beyond objectives, explanation quality, and consumer and provider fairness. Our study provides a picture of the progress in this field, highlighting open issues and future directions. Source code: \\url{https://github.com/giacoballoccu/rep-path-reasoning-recsys}.","PeriodicalId":126309,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Information Retrieval","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.05944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Path reasoning is a notable recommendation approach that models high-order user-product relations, based on a Knowledge Graph (KG). This approach can extract reasoning paths between recommended products and already experienced products and, then, turn such paths into textual explanations for the user. Unfortunately, evaluation protocols in this field appear heterogeneous and limited, making it hard to contextualize the impact of the existing methods. In this paper, we replicated three state-of-the-art relevant path reasoning recommendation methods proposed in top-tier conferences. Under a common evaluation protocol, based on two public data sets and in comparison with other knowledge-aware methods, we then studied the extent to which they meet recommendation utility and beyond objectives, explanation quality, and consumer and provider fairness. Our study provides a picture of the progress in this field, highlighting open issues and future directions. Source code: \url{https://github.com/giacoballoccu/rep-path-reasoning-recsys}.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识就是力量,理解就是影响:路径推理推荐中的效用与超越目标、解释质量与公平性
路径推理是一种值得注意的推荐方法,它基于知识图(Knowledge Graph, KG)建模高阶用户-产品关系。这种方法可以提取推荐产品和已经体验过的产品之间的推理路径,然后将这些路径转换为用户的文本解释。不幸的是,该领域的评估协议表现出异质性和局限性,使得很难将现有方法的影响置于环境中。在本文中,我们复制了在顶级会议上提出的三种最先进的相关路径推理推荐方法。在一个通用的评估协议下,基于两个公共数据集,并与其他知识感知方法进行比较,我们然后研究了它们满足推荐效用和超越目标、解释质量以及消费者和提供者公平性的程度。我们的研究提供了这一领域的进展情况,突出了开放的问题和未来的方向。源代码:\url{https://github.com/giacoballoccu/rep-path-reasoning-recsys}。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiments in News Bias Detection with Pre-trained Neural Transformers Is Interpretable Machine Learning Effective at Feature Selection for Neural Learning-to-Rank? Two-Step SPLADE: Simple, Efficient and Effective Approximation of SPLADE Exploring the Nexus Between Retrievability and Query Generation Strategies Countering Mainstream Bias via End-to-End Adaptive Local Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1