An investigator-initiated study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in Indian patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer

Sudhir Palsaniya, S. Saini, A. Samar, S. Patni, A. Bapna
{"title":"An investigator-initiated study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in Indian patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer","authors":"Sudhir Palsaniya, S. Saini, A. Samar, S. Patni, A. Bapna","doi":"10.4103/oji.oji_8_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) has a high incidence rate in the Indo-Gangetic belt and is usually presented in the unresectable advanced or metastatic stage. In this study, we evaluated the response rate and toxicities of the gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP)-based combination chemotherapy in unresectable or metastatic GBC patients. Subjects and Methods: This was an investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective study conducted on unresectable or metastatic GBC patients at Jaipur, India, for 1 year. All the patients received a GEM-CAP combination chemotherapy regimen which consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 min on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine at 800 mg/m2 orally twice a day for 14 days, administered every 21 days. The response was evaluated in terms of overall response rate (ORR), tumor control rate (TCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Both quantitative and qualitative toxicities were assessed. Results: A total of 35 patients were enrolled, of which 3 patients were excluded due to treatment interruption. The mean age of patients was 55 (32–80) years, with the majority being female (77.14%), having an ECOG score of 1 (71.43%), and with Stage IVB disease (77.14%). The ORR was 25%, TCR was 50%, and median PFS was 4 months. Major toxicities noted were Grade I and II hematological and nonhematological toxicities, which were managed adequately. Conclusion: The combination therapy of gemcitabine and capecitabine is reasonable, feasible, and well-tolerated approach for the treatment of unresectable advanced and metastatic GBC patients, a disease that had limited treatment options.","PeriodicalId":431823,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Journal of India","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/oji.oji_8_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) has a high incidence rate in the Indo-Gangetic belt and is usually presented in the unresectable advanced or metastatic stage. In this study, we evaluated the response rate and toxicities of the gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP)-based combination chemotherapy in unresectable or metastatic GBC patients. Subjects and Methods: This was an investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective study conducted on unresectable or metastatic GBC patients at Jaipur, India, for 1 year. All the patients received a GEM-CAP combination chemotherapy regimen which consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 min on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine at 800 mg/m2 orally twice a day for 14 days, administered every 21 days. The response was evaluated in terms of overall response rate (ORR), tumor control rate (TCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Both quantitative and qualitative toxicities were assessed. Results: A total of 35 patients were enrolled, of which 3 patients were excluded due to treatment interruption. The mean age of patients was 55 (32–80) years, with the majority being female (77.14%), having an ECOG score of 1 (71.43%), and with Stage IVB disease (77.14%). The ORR was 25%, TCR was 50%, and median PFS was 4 months. Major toxicities noted were Grade I and II hematological and nonhematological toxicities, which were managed adequately. Conclusion: The combination therapy of gemcitabine and capecitabine is reasonable, feasible, and well-tolerated approach for the treatment of unresectable advanced and metastatic GBC patients, a disease that had limited treatment options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项由研究者发起的吉西他滨和卡培他滨在印度不可切除或转移性胆囊癌患者中的研究
背景:胆囊癌(GBC)在印度恒河带的发病率很高,通常表现为不可切除的晚期或转移期。在这项研究中,我们评估了吉西他滨加卡培他滨(GEM-CAP)联合化疗在不可切除或转移性GBC患者中的反应率和毒性。受试者和方法:这是一项研究者发起的单臂前瞻性研究,在印度斋浦尔对不可切除或转移性GBC患者进行了为期1年的研究。所有患者均接受GEM-CAP联合化疗方案,其中吉西他滨1000mg /m2静脉注射,第1天和第8天30分钟;卡培他滨800mg /m2口服,每天2次,连续14天,每21天给药一次。根据总缓解率(ORR)、肿瘤控制率(TCR)和无进展生存期(PFS)来评估疗效。定量和定性毒性评估。结果:共纳入35例患者,其中3例因治疗中断而被排除。患者平均年龄55岁(32 ~ 80岁),女性居多(77.14%),ECOG评分为1分(71.43%),IVB期(77.14%)。ORR为25%,TCR为50%,中位PFS为4个月。注意到的主要毒性是I级和II级血液和非血液毒性,这些毒性得到了充分的管理。结论:吉西他滨和卡培他滨联合治疗不可切除的晚期和转移性GBC患者是一种合理、可行、耐受性良好的治疗方法,这种疾病的治疗选择有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma of the thyroid: A rare case Burned-out testicular tumor presenting as cervical and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy Nasal sebaceous carcinoma: A case treated at a tertiary care center Xanthogranulomatous hypophysitis masquerading as pituitary macroadenoma Cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab with or without prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy: A prospective study from a tertiary cancer institute at Guwahati, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1