A Qualitative Study Of Emergency Nurses’ Basic Life Support Practices In A Ghanaian University Hospital

Alex Darteh Afrifa, M. Abdulai, J. Prah
{"title":"A Qualitative Study Of Emergency Nurses’ Basic Life Support Practices In A Ghanaian University Hospital","authors":"Alex Darteh Afrifa, M. Abdulai, J. Prah","doi":"10.37341/JKG.V0I0.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nBackground: Medical emergencies are common but Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) incidences are rare; yet when they occur could be life threatening leading either to disability or death. During SCA incidents, health care professionals will be required to act skilfully and swiftly to restart the heart and stabilise the patient until advanced care can be accessed or provided. There is evidence that victims of cardio and/or respiratory arrest whilst in the hospital will have improved outcomes if Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is initiated within three to five minutes. The objectives of this study were to find if emergency nurses were adequately resourced to practice Basic Life Support (BLS), and the ease or difficulties with which they practice BLS. \nMethods: This Qualitative Descriptive (QD) study was conducted at the University of Cape Coast Hospital (UCCH) between June and September 2019. Six nurses were purposively recruited for the study. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcription was done with Microsoft Word and transferred to Microsoft Excel for thematic analysis using an inductive descriptive approach. Data analysis took a conventional qualitative content analysis approach. \nResults: Four of the participants were females whilst two were males. During data aggregation and analysis, 17 first-level codes were extracted from which two themes, five categories and six subcategories were obtained for discussion. The major themes were: (1) Basic Life Support (BLS) equipment and material resources, and (2) working environment and human resource. \nConclusion: The study found that nurses working at emergency ward at UCCH were adequately resourced and well prepared to practice BLS. They however had challenges as their work seem to be hindered by patients who present to the ward without emergency needs and unavailability of emergency drugs.","PeriodicalId":235873,"journal":{"name":"JKG (Jurnal Keperawatan Global)","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JKG (Jurnal Keperawatan Global)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37341/JKG.V0I0.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Medical emergencies are common but Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) incidences are rare; yet when they occur could be life threatening leading either to disability or death. During SCA incidents, health care professionals will be required to act skilfully and swiftly to restart the heart and stabilise the patient until advanced care can be accessed or provided. There is evidence that victims of cardio and/or respiratory arrest whilst in the hospital will have improved outcomes if Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is initiated within three to five minutes. The objectives of this study were to find if emergency nurses were adequately resourced to practice Basic Life Support (BLS), and the ease or difficulties with which they practice BLS. Methods: This Qualitative Descriptive (QD) study was conducted at the University of Cape Coast Hospital (UCCH) between June and September 2019. Six nurses were purposively recruited for the study. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcription was done with Microsoft Word and transferred to Microsoft Excel for thematic analysis using an inductive descriptive approach. Data analysis took a conventional qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Four of the participants were females whilst two were males. During data aggregation and analysis, 17 first-level codes were extracted from which two themes, five categories and six subcategories were obtained for discussion. The major themes were: (1) Basic Life Support (BLS) equipment and material resources, and (2) working environment and human resource. Conclusion: The study found that nurses working at emergency ward at UCCH were adequately resourced and well prepared to practice BLS. They however had challenges as their work seem to be hindered by patients who present to the ward without emergency needs and unavailability of emergency drugs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳某大学医院急诊护士基本生命支持实践的定性研究
背景:医疗紧急情况是常见的,但心脏骤停(SCA)的发生率是罕见的;然而,当它们发生时,可能会危及生命,导致残疾或死亡。在SCA事件中,医疗保健专业人员将被要求熟练而迅速地采取行动,重新启动心脏并稳定患者,直到可以获得或提供高级护理。有证据表明,如果在三到五分钟内开始心肺复苏(CPR),住院期间心脏和/或呼吸骤停的受害者将有更好的结果。本研究的目的是发现急诊护士是否有足够的资源来实践基本生命支持(BLS),以及他们实践BLS的难易程度。方法:本定性描述性(QD)研究于2019年6月至9月在海岸角大学医院(UCCH)进行。有目的地招募了六名护士参加这项研究。所有采访都有录音记录,并逐字抄写。转录是用Microsoft Word完成的,并转移到Microsoft Excel中使用归纳描述方法进行主题分析。数据分析采用传统的定性内容分析方法。结果:四名参与者是女性,两名是男性。在数据汇总分析过程中,抽取17个一级代码,从中得到2个主题、5个类目和6个小类目供讨论。主要主题是:(1)基本生命支持(BLS)设备和物质资源;(2)工作环境和人力资源。结论:本研究发现,在UCCH急诊科工作的护士有充足的资源和充分的准备来实践BLS。然而,他们遇到了挑战,因为他们的工作似乎受到了没有紧急需要和无法获得紧急药物的病人的阻碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of Role Play on Knowledge and Skills of Spinal Injury Indications Evacuation Improvement The Effect of Therapeutic Communication on the Anxiety Level of Children Undergoing the COVID-19 Vaccination The Phenomenon of Sleeping in Sand Based On Culture In Elderly With Osteoarthritis Study of Diabetes Mellitus Management Policies Using a Systems Approach in Surge Capacity Standardized Nursing Language (SNL) Application in Diverse Nursing Practice and Documentation Settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1