Traditional versus Social Media News Coverage: An Analysis of the Topic Selection Priorities

Sadaf Asif, NoorUl Ain, A. Siddiqua
{"title":"Traditional versus Social Media News Coverage: An Analysis of the Topic Selection Priorities","authors":"Sadaf Asif, NoorUl Ain, A. Siddiqua","doi":"10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-i).14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study was carried out on framing the ongoing debate on the inter-relationship which exists between social media and traditional media news coverages. Its particular focus is to analyze how both mediums focus on their topic selection when it comes to prioritizing an issue to be presented at the top. By employing the content analysis technique of the Facebook posts and newspaper articles the study tried to sort out to what extent differences exist in traditional media and social media coverage with respect to the selection of the topic in Pakistan. The researchers used Chi-square tests to weigh up the use of alternative media and the frame selection of social media in the selected timeline. The study concluded that social media and traditional media react differently when covering social issues. Social media showed better interaction patterns on grass root issues whereas traditional media focused more on covering political issues.","PeriodicalId":235368,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Sciences Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-i).14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study was carried out on framing the ongoing debate on the inter-relationship which exists between social media and traditional media news coverages. Its particular focus is to analyze how both mediums focus on their topic selection when it comes to prioritizing an issue to be presented at the top. By employing the content analysis technique of the Facebook posts and newspaper articles the study tried to sort out to what extent differences exist in traditional media and social media coverage with respect to the selection of the topic in Pakistan. The researchers used Chi-square tests to weigh up the use of alternative media and the frame selection of social media in the selected timeline. The study concluded that social media and traditional media react differently when covering social issues. Social media showed better interaction patterns on grass root issues whereas traditional media focused more on covering political issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统媒体与社交媒体新闻报道:选题优先级分析
目前的研究是在构建关于社交媒体和传统媒体新闻报道之间存在的相互关系的持续辩论上进行的。它的特别重点是分析两种媒体在优先考虑要在顶部呈现的问题时如何关注他们的主题选择。通过使用Facebook帖子和报纸文章的内容分析技术,本研究试图梳理巴基斯坦传统媒体和社交媒体报道在主题选择方面存在多大程度的差异。研究人员使用卡方检验来衡量替代媒体的使用和在选定的时间轴上对社交媒体的框架选择。该研究得出结论,社交媒体和传统媒体在报道社会问题时的反应不同。社交媒体在基层问题上表现出更好的互动模式,而传统媒体则更多地关注政治问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Influencing Motorists' Injury Severities: An Empirical Assessment of Crashes in District Peshawar, Pakistan The Indecisive Role of English and Urdu in Multilingual Pakistan New Trends in the Historiography of Pakistan: A Case Study of Writings by Prof. Muhammad Iqbal Chawla Insights into Significant Contribution by Local Government toward Community Development in the Bahawalpur Division An Instance of Corruption during the Hajj and Pakistan's Far-Superior Judiciary System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1