The American and the European social dream: the competition of welfare regimes

Josef Weidenholzer, C. Aspalter
{"title":"The American and the European social dream: the competition of welfare regimes","authors":"Josef Weidenholzer, C. Aspalter","doi":"10.1080/17486830701848662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article sets out to unravel the overall picture of the dominant social models in the Western world – that of the European Union and that of the United States. The American model, or “American (social) dream,” is put into direct comparison with its European counterpart, the “European social dream,” using the method of juxtaposition to analyze, in a strictly normative (i.e. evaluative) manner, the current status, trends, and future applicability of each model under scrutiny. The authors conclude that the costs for non-social policy are staggering. That is, the implementation of a comprehensive and, more importantly, effective welfare state system is essential for the survival of societies and the continuation of their particular path of social development. The absence thereof leads to more costly side-effects. The juxtaposition of both the American and the European social dreams leads to the conclusion that the former is built on unsustainable notions of penal policy, while the latter offers a real win–win solution, in terms of investment in sustainable, and hence efficient and effective, social welfare systems.","PeriodicalId":270572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Social Welfare","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486830701848662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article sets out to unravel the overall picture of the dominant social models in the Western world – that of the European Union and that of the United States. The American model, or “American (social) dream,” is put into direct comparison with its European counterpart, the “European social dream,” using the method of juxtaposition to analyze, in a strictly normative (i.e. evaluative) manner, the current status, trends, and future applicability of each model under scrutiny. The authors conclude that the costs for non-social policy are staggering. That is, the implementation of a comprehensive and, more importantly, effective welfare state system is essential for the survival of societies and the continuation of their particular path of social development. The absence thereof leads to more costly side-effects. The juxtaposition of both the American and the European social dreams leads to the conclusion that the former is built on unsustainable notions of penal policy, while the latter offers a real win–win solution, in terms of investment in sustainable, and hence efficient and effective, social welfare systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国和欧洲的社会梦:福利制度的竞争
本文旨在揭示西方世界主要的社会模式——欧盟和美国的社会模式——的全貌。本文将美国模式或“美国(社会)梦”与其欧洲对应的“欧洲社会梦”进行了直接比较,采用并置的方法,以严格规范(即评估)的方式,分析了所审查的每种模式的现状、趋势和未来适用性。作者得出结论,非社会政策的成本是惊人的。也就是说,实施一个全面的、更重要的是有效的福利国家制度,对于社会的生存和社会发展的特定道路的继续是必不可少的。缺乏这种药物会导致更昂贵的副作用。把美国和欧洲的社会梦想放在一起,可以得出这样的结论:美国的社会梦想建立在不可持续的刑罚政策观念之上,而欧洲的社会梦想则提供了一个真正的双赢解决方案,即投资于可持续的、因而也是高效的社会福利制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the financial crisis on happiness in affluent European countries Active ageing and pensions in the European Union Time and punishment: a comparison of UK and US time bank use in criminal justice systems Historical perspectives on North Korea: a brief introduction and bibliography Income inequality and its driving forces in transitional countries: evidence from Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1